RE: Is Obama Worse Than Hitler?

RE: Is Obama Worse Than Hitler? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Moonhead -> RE: Is Obama Worse Than Hitler? (5/30/2010 1:01:43 PM)
It's a pretty solid piece of evidence that somebody doesn't have any real reasons to have a go at somebody else and is just getting desperate whoever's doing it, poppy.

DCWoody -> RE: Is Obama Worse Than Hitler? (5/30/2010 1:01:43 PM)
You don't know what Eugenics is do you?

Moonhead -> RE: Is Obama Worse Than Hitler? (5/30/2010 1:03:28 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DCWoody You don't know what Eugenics is do you? Doesn't look like it. WTS: Eugenics is usually defined (and I'm hoping that there aren't any variant definitions on here, as there are for "liberal" and "socialist") as crude form of genetic manipulation. Typically, it focusses on improving a genome by eliminating undesirable characteristics through selective breeding. This is how, say, fancy dogs were twisted into bizarre inbred freaks of nature. When applied to our own race, the thrust is more normally on doing away with inferior ethnic groups who might interbreed with the ubermensch and drag them down into the shit with the rest of the scum. This is why the term can be applied to Hitler's attempts to wipe out every jew in mainland Europe, but not really to abortion, particularly in your country where the people most see as racially undesirable tend not to use it half as much as the WASPs.

WantingToServe11 -> RE: Is Obama Worse Than Hitler? (5/30/2010 1:06:45 PM)
There is more than one philosophy of eugenics where trying to get rid of a genetic or negative defects is centered. For instance, there are those who believe in population control of the entire world. There are also individuals who believe a particular race of people are too primitive, worthless, or simply not worthy of life thus they should be weeded out of existence. Condoms and abortion are used to help control population growth thus they are tools used and manufactured in the eugenics industry.

Musicmystery -> RE: Is Obama Worse Than Hitler? (5/30/2010 1:10:08 PM)
quote: Is Obama Worse Than Hitler? No. Are you dumber than shit? Yes. I hope this helps you understand the matter. Glad to help.

Moonhead -> RE: Is Obama Worse Than Hitler? (5/30/2010 1:13:11 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WantingToServe11 For instance, there are those who believe in population control of the entire world. That's more to do with Malthus' ideas about a sustainable population level (popularised by the Club Of Rome during the '70s) than genetics or eugenics, I'm afraid. Given your last point, I don't see why you couldn't get what I was saying.

DCWoody -> RE: Is Obama Worse Than Hitler? (5/30/2010 1:14:33 PM)
"(in reply to Musicmystery)" DAMMIT.

rulemylife -> RE: Is Obama Worse Than Hitler? (5/30/2010 1:16:16 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: popeye1250 quote: ORIGINAL: Moonhead Comparing somebody to Hitler is a standard tactic for the internet tough guy, isn't it? Strange that cucky should be doing that. He's normally such a charming, classy gent, after all. Shh, Moon, you're criticising one of the left's favorite tactics. Practicing more of that moderate Independent philosophy Popeye? Show me when you have seen a thread asking if Bush was worse than Hitler.

SL4V3M4YB3 -> RE: Is Obama Worse Than Hitler? (5/30/2010 1:17:55 PM)
This is why dog breeding is pure evil, all those dead dogs.

rulemylife -> RE: Is Obama Worse Than Hitler? (5/30/2010 1:27:45 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WantingToServe11 Eugenics doesn't always have to deal with ethnic or racial population deduction. It can also revolves around population control such as condoms or abortion for instance. So what you are saying is men who use condoms and women who have abortions are practicing eugenics. How does that fit in with the definition of eugenics? eu·gen·ics –noun ( used with a singular verb [image]http://sp.dictionary.com/dictstatic/dictionary/graphics/luna/thinsp.png[/image]) the study of or belief in the possibility of improving the qualities of the human species or a human population, esp. by such means as discouraging reproduction by persons having genetic defects or presumed to have inheritable undesirable traits (negative eugenics) or encouraging reproduction by persons presumed to have inheritable desirable traits (positive eugenics). (Dictionary.com)

SL4V3M4YB3 -> RE: Is Obama Worse Than Hitler? (5/30/2010 1:32:31 PM)
Good job you edited that because I don't understand Shakespearian xml.

Moonhead -> RE: Is Obama Worse Than Hitler? (5/30/2010 1:35:47 PM)
It's probably a clearer explanation than mine was, anyway.

rulemylife -> RE: Is Obama Worse Than Hitler? (5/30/2010 1:47:53 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SL4V3M4YB3 Good job you edited that because I don't understand Shakespearian xml. [:D] Yeah,that's the problem with Dictionary.com, when you preview it looks normal. You can't edit it until you post. I usually try to do it quicker but I lost the connection.

MC4Misfit -> RE: Is Obama Worse Than Hitler? (5/30/2010 7:21:14 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: cuckoldmepls Well think about this. Within one week of taking office, Obama reversed the Bush policy, and began funding overseas organizations who pay for abortions. He also tried to make taxpayers pay for abortion in the original health care bill. Therefore, he is a mass murderer. Worse yet, he goes after defenseless unborn children. You may claim that he didn't succeed in the health care plan, but the fact is, he keeps appointing supreme court justices who support abortion. Therefore, he is a mass murderer since he does nothing to stop it. And what have you done to stop it? Have you become president and set up a Supreme Court to stop it. Have to gotten elected to Congress and got legislation passed to ban it? If you haven't done anything to stop it, you're a mass murder and worse than Hitler! Okay, seriously, I don't mean that. I'm just trying to make a point here. Political discussion has become too much about hyperbole. When it doubt either compare your enemy to Hitler or call him the Antichrist. I don't remember if Jimmy Carter was the Antichrist, but I've heard that EVERY US president since then was. Here's a fresh new concept. If you don't like how the government is going, rather than just bitch about it on the internet, why not try to do something positive about it. Everyone complains that special interest groups control our government, so join one! Find one that suits you goal and work with them. Do something positive. Even if it doesn't pay off, then at least you know that you tried.

Silence8 -> RE: Is Obama Worse Than Hitler? (5/30/2010 7:27:51 PM)
[spots 'Is Obama Worse Than Hitler' thread... is that a sigh? a chuckle?] [drawn to thread... no, don't open it, it's going to be REALLY stupid...] [...still, though...] [must... open... stupid... thread.......] [Oh no!.... there aren't even any snarky jokes... noooooooooooooo....]

Arpig -> RE: Is Obama Worse Than Hitler? (5/30/2010 7:29:39 PM)
~FR to OP~ So you are equating abortion with mass murder/genocide....well then wouldn't Bush be worse than Obama because Bush allowed abortion to continue for 8 years without making any attempt to stop it.

cuckoldmepls -> RE: Is Obama Worse Than Hitler? (5/30/2010 7:44:48 PM)
Although I can't stand Bush either, at least he opposed Abortion, and his policy was not to fund overseas agencies who paid for abortions. He also tried to appoint conservative supreme court justices, but the problem was that his first choice was usually too conservative for liberals and RINO's in Congress to be approved. The bottom line is that abortion is not a valid method of birth control. That's what vasectomies and birth control are for.

cuckoldmepls -> RE: Is Obama Worse Than Hitler? (5/30/2010 7:49:00 PM)
Another thing that makes him so dangerous to America is that he's doing all of this under the guise of political correctness. Unlike Hitler, his intentions were obvious to anyone who listened to his speeches. With Obama, most people won't know what his true agenda is until it's too late.

cuckoldmepls -> RE: Is Obama Worse Than Hitler? (5/30/2010 7:56:42 PM)
There is hope though. Obama has almost destroyed the democratic party in less than 9 months. It took Bush 8 years to almost destroy the republican party, and that was only because the insurgents in Iraq can't stand the thought of freedom in the middle east, and the housing bubble burst, which could have happened during either administration. It was in fact the fault of both parties who encouraged and perhaps required financial institutions to loan money at the drop of a hat to low income people. As one black politician said on John Stossel. In reality, it was too much government interference that caused it. http://babelishere.webs.com/aware.html

Arpig -> RE: Is Obama Worse Than Hitler? (5/30/2010 8:01:08 PM)
quote: With Obama, most people won't know what his true agenda is until it's too late. And yet an moron like you has managed to figure out this twue hidden agenda...I guess his cover isn't actually fool-proof is it [image]local://upfiles/218457/BED6A8B5B646489FA65F0C8A163E0F43.jpg[/image]

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875