UniqueRaven
Posts: 1237
Joined: 9/30/2009 From: Austin, TX Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: leadership527 quote:
ORIGINAL: Andalusite Jeff (leadership), I had to regretfully turn down a couple of potential partners, even though they seemed reasonably compatible in kink and vanilla aspects, because they needed a power exchange dynamic but had an incompatible philosophy/view of D/s. Someone who feels that masochism/bottoming or compliance/obedience is the same thing as submission would most likely not be a good fit for me. If I happened to react submissively toward him, then we might attempt to make it work, but if not, I would feel like I was founding our relationship on a lie by agreeing to be his submissive. And let me stand right up and applaud that. You, however are not speaking about what SUBMISSION is, you are speaking about what works for you.... which is what I was doing... and Raven. I flagged porcelaine because she used absolutes and because I respect her enough to actually call her on it. Most people who write such things I simply ignore. Thank you, and i'm very sunburned and tired right now so my posts are suffering as a result tonight. i've thought a few times about attempting to define "submission" as an exercise, and every time i simply stop - because i know, i know in my heart and mind that submission is an absolutely subjective state dependent upon the person, and the people, and the relationship, involved. i do know that there are times when i do simply comply - and it is simple action for me. i'm not sure if that's actually submission for me though. But, as i've mentioned on this thread, there are times when i simply don't overthink submission by choice, and simply do as i'm told - and let the submissive feelings sort themselves out. And it works for me. So is that compliance? Yes, but it doesn't exist in a vacuum. However, i will say that it is very, very easy for me to comply with any command, owned or not - one reason i don't attend play parties unowned is because really, if a random Dom wanted to play with me for the night, and approached me as such, i would comply - even though inside i would be totally upset with myself. It is that deep seated "need to please" that i have - and i comply because i want to please. So is that submission? i'm not sure. Bottom line for me though, is that i know that whatever i am feeling, or acting, or expressing - whether compliance, or submission - is that it comes from a deep, deep internal motivation that is strongly rooted in what i am. One of the reasons i refer to myself as an "unowned slave" vs. a submissive (a rule that some hold that you can't be a slave unless you're owned) is because i am a slave - it is my identity, and it is what i am - whether i'm owned or not. It's the difference between outward and inward discipline directed as an action towards a goal - i am not slave because of the consequences of failure, i am slave because it is what i am. Slave is simply not just an outward existence for me of simple action - it is action manifested by that deep inward state that i have. i hope this makes sense, and i'm appreciating the discussion. If this winds up in a new thread, i'll be happy to submit (lol) more.
< Message edited by UniqueRaven -- 6/1/2010 7:38:19 PM >
_____________________________
"My life has no purpose, no direction, no aim, no meaning, and yet I'm happy. I can't figure it out. What am I doing right?" ~Snoopy (Charles Schultz) My blog is at http://takinghishand.wordpress.com
|