Silence8
Posts: 833
Joined: 11/2/2009 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DarlingSavage I know this is kind of old news, but still, as far as I know, nothing has been done to prosecute those responsible for violating the terms of the Geneva Convention. However, I was watching a film on the prosecution of Adolph Eichmann and others and in his testimony, Eichmann states that the only thing he is guilty of is following orders. He states that the only ones responsible for the atrocities of Auschwitz and the other camps are solely those that were in political authority. This made me think of the controversy surrounding those that carried out orders to perform torture for the US in the pursuit of "intelligence". I recall people saying several times over that the men and women actually committing the torture shouldn't be prosecuted since they were merely being obedient and "following orders". This sickens me. Don't people know the difference between right and wrong? Especially on this level. I think that if it was wrong for people of the SS and the Gestapo on the lower rungs of hierarchy to commit these crimes, it is also equally wrong for our people to commit these same crimes. Will people be so blind as to just follow orders or does anyone follow the guidance of their own conscience, even to the point of persecution? The Army I was in told us to be kind to POWs because that way, we could befriend our enemies. That's what they showed to us privates new in basic, anyway. Anyway, torture doesn't really procure intelligence, all you get is people saying what you want them to say just to make you stop hurting them. Well, I'm curious to know what people think. Google search 'Little Eichmanns' (a bit of a controversy a while back, Ward Churchill, a Native American professor, loses his jobs by comparing the people inside the WTC to Adolf Eichmann). The thing is, though, that Noam Chomsky, truly one of the heroes of Hannah Arendt (who wrote the famous book on Eichmann), in an interview basically agreed with Churchill!
|