RE: Pelosi: Pursues Public Policy "in keeping with the values" of Jesus Christ, "The Word made Flesh (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


thompsonx -> RE: Pelosi: Pursues Public Policy "in keeping with the values" of Jesus Christ, "The Word made Flesh (6/2/2010 5:56:51 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydawg

http://www.google.com/search?q=Female+kings&sourceid=ie7&rls=com.microsoft:en-us:IE-SearchBox&ie=&oe=



As usuall Thompson has no clue about what he is saying.

There have been Biologically Female kings for thousands of years.

15 seconds on Google.....




From the cite you posted:

June 27, 2007—Egypt's most famous female pharaoh—known for depictions showing her with a false beard—has been identified, Egyptian archaeologists announced today.

The body of Hatshepsut, who ruled ancient Egypt from 1473 to 1458 B.C., had been feared lost. But a mummy found decades ago in a rough tomb in the Valley of the Kings now appears to be the gender-bending queen.

Perhaps you should read before you snark




thompsonx -> RE: Pelosi: Pursues Public Policy "in keeping with the values" of Jesus Christ, "The Word made Flesh (6/2/2010 6:09:20 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydawg

Thompson, nice to see you are still obsessing on me and my words. Glad to see they have such a profound effect on you.

Now despite the fact that you are a lying coward,

Name calling is your usual alternative to answering questions.


I will give you an answer (even though you are scared to answer my questions, and are such a dolt you can't comprehend what you read, whats the life span of Pygmies??).

Please try to stay on topic.
That thread is still open and you are free to respond to it at any time.



I reject the Nicine creed and special divinity of Christ (who is also known as the Krishna of the west). Christ was the Son of God, but so am I and you.

As I was brought up in a christian household, when I imagine the divine, It gets a face and some characteristics of Jesus. Its a residual cultural effect.


I think durring the missing 30 years of Jesus' life,

There are only 18 missing years not 30.
Jesus stays in the temple about age 12 chatting up the priest. His folks come back for him and he chides his mother with the admonition "I must be about my father's business"


he travelled to see the wise men of the east (Bhuddists and Hindus) and actually was a bhudist. The sermon on the mount seems (to me) to be teachign bhudism.

I asked you what the difference was between a zen christian and a christian. So far you have left the question unanswered.






thompsonx -> RE: Pelosi: Pursues Public Policy "in keeping with the values" of Jesus Christ, "The Word made Flesh (6/2/2010 6:13:35 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: FatDomDaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: FatDomDaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: FatDomDaddy

Why... History is full of examples of female Kings.


Would you be so kind as to list them for the erudition of us all?



What is this... an attempt to show me up or are you seriously doubting that women have the capicty to rule as a king? Rather sexist of you is it not?


When females rule they are called queen or empress not king nor emperor...it is called rules of grammar.

I mean clearly you have already looked it up on the internet so you know female kings, existed and ruled so I must ask what is the point of your post?

The point is that they are not kings...I was under the impression that you spoke english.





This is so sexist I have no idea where to begin.

Again...

History is full examples female Kings, especially in Africa.

But I am sure you know that by now too.


So far you have not produced one.
A gentleman is called Mr. a lady is called Mrs. Miss or Ms.
It is simple grammar not sexism...I find it difficult to believe that you are really this dense.
But you are pressing a compelling arguement




MrRodgers -> RE: Pelosi: Pursues Public Policy "in keeping with the values" of Jesus Christ, "The Word made Flesh (6/2/2010 7:42:28 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

She hasn't?

What about healthcare reform with the death panels?

And her attempts for a fake carbon tax?

You should re-think your reply.


Still coming with that tired shit ? Just think the right would rather have 'free market' 'God committees' something that really did exist rather then something from their partisan, political imagination...called death panels.

Your death panels now are called boards of directors at your hallowed for-profit health care insurance providers. If they don't approve your claim, well you can just go ahead and die. Better yet, we'll get our profits while in true capitalist form...somebody else pays for it.




FatDomDaddy -> RE: Pelosi: Pursues Public Policy "in keeping with the values" of Jesus Christ, "The Word made Flesh (6/2/2010 9:14:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

So far you have not produced one.
A gentleman is called Mr. a lady is called Mrs. Miss or Ms.
It is simple grammar not sexism...I find it difficult to believe that you are really this dense.
But you are pressing a compelling arguement



Ancients... try looking up the female kings in Ur or in Canaan, Medieval... Jadwiga of Poland or Christina of Sweden, Want modern ones.... Ahebi Ugbabe of the Enugu-Ezike in colonial Nigeria or Peggielene Bartels of Ghana today.

As to Ancient Egypt, have an actual, female king, Khentykaues I of the 4th Dynasty.

There is evidence for female kings in ancient European tribal cultures, Asian Cultures from Indian, China and Indo-China. Mesoamerica has evidence pointing to female kings as do Oceanic and Aboriginal Australian women who may have claimed the title king.


So, thompsonx... a person can change their gender and you will argue they are the sex they choose but you deny a female monarch her choice to claim the title of king? And your reason is not sexism but grammar?

How very Liberal of you.

(Pssst… thompsonx,… a teaching moment… that last sentence, that is irony, that how you use it.)






hlen5 -> RE: Pelosi: Pursues Public Policy "in keeping with the values" of Jesus Christ, "The Word made Flesh (6/2/2010 11:00:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: hlen5

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

E.

You miss the point.

Pelosi DOES push her views on the "I deem this passed" country.

The method of attribution is mute- as she thinks she is king.




Until she grows a cock and balls she is going to have to settle for being queen


Second (or third?) in line for the Presidency and she has to "settle" for being a queen? I'm sure she wakes up daily saying, "Oh woe is me!!"


No, I believe she will have to settle for "Madam President".


I'm not sure you got my sarcasm. I meant she is fourth in line for the leadership of this land and her poor penis-less self would be "settling". 




luckydawg -> RE: Pelosi: Pursues Public Policy "in keeping with the values" of Jesus Christ, "The Word made Flesh (6/3/2010 1:42:28 AM)

quote:

Obviously Jesus was a socialist. He did collect the food from those who had and divided it among those who had not.

Where on earth do you think he did that? Not at the Sermon on the mount. He instructed the people to begin passing thier food and miraculously, there was enough for all and leftovers.

He went on and on about not worrying about food or shelter, but to worry about the spirit and relationship with God. He certainly instructed people to share, but he never advocated empowering some to take under threat of Law in order to give to others. There ain't no Socialism there.


What do you think Socialism is? And am I to understand that, in your opinion, Obama and Pelosi are Socialists, and the dim ones on my side who call them that are correct?




thishereboi -> RE: Pelosi: Pursues Public Policy "in keeping with the values" of Jesus Christ, "The Word made Flesh (6/3/2010 8:20:00 AM)

quote:

Ah - would that be "socialism" by any chance? Or would it be "liberal"? I get so confused at these terms and few it seems are able to explain them except by reference to evil.


Well, I have no problems with the gov using part of my tax money to help others, in fact I think its a great idea, and I lean towards the right, so it must be conservative[:)]




thishereboi -> RE: Pelosi: Pursues Public Policy "in keeping with the values" of Jesus Christ, "The Word made Flesh (6/3/2010 8:29:42 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydawg

http://www.google.com/search?q=Female+kings&sourceid=ie7&rls=com.microsoft:en-us:IE-SearchBox&ie=&oe=



As usuall Thompson has no clue about what he is saying.

There have been Biologically Female kings for thousands of years.

15 seconds on Google.....




From the cite you posted:

June 27, 2007—Egypt's most famous female pharaoh—known for depictions showing her with a false beard—has been identified, Egyptian archaeologists announced today.

The body of Hatshepsut, who ruled ancient Egypt from 1473 to 1458 B.C., had been feared lost. But a mummy found decades ago in a rough tomb in the Valley of the Kings now appears to be the gender-bending queen.

Perhaps you should read before you snark


http://www.iupress.indiana.edu/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=406796

"An Igbo woman becomes king at a time of extraordinary change in Africa"

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2010/03/09/DI2010030903479.html

"Peggielene Bartels had been a Washington secretary for almost 30 years when the elders of an African village anointed her to be their king. "




thompsonx -> RE: Pelosi: Pursues Public Policy "in keeping with the values" of Jesus Christ, "The Word made Flesh (6/3/2010 9:08:17 AM)

quote:

I'm not sure you got my sarcasm. I meant she is fourth in line for the leadership of this land and her poor penis-less self would be "settling".


I was hoping that was the case.
Please accept my apology for not recognizing it sooner.




thompsonx -> RE: Pelosi: Pursues Public Policy "in keeping with the values" of Jesus Christ, "The Word made Flesh (6/3/2010 11:32:29 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: FatDomDaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

So far you have not produced one.
A gentleman is called Mr. a lady is called Mrs. Miss or Ms.
It is simple grammar not sexism...I find it difficult to believe that you are really this dense.
But you are pressing a compelling arguement



Ancients... try looking up the female kings in Ur or in Canaan, Medieval... Jadwiga of Poland or Christina of Sweden, Want modern ones.... Ahebi Ugbabe of the Enugu-Ezike in colonial Nigeria or Peggielene Bartels of Ghana today.

As to Ancient Egypt, have an actual, female king, Khentykaues I of the 4th Dynasty.

There is evidence for female kings in ancient European tribal cultures, Asian Cultures from Indian, China and Indo-China. Mesoamerica has evidence pointing to female kings as do Oceanic and Aboriginal Australian women who may have claimed the title king.


So, thompsonx... a person can change their gender and you will argue they are the sex they choose but you deny a female monarch her choice to claim the title of king? And your reason is not sexism but grammar?

How very Liberal of you.

(Pssst… thompsonx,… a teaching moment… that last sentence, that is irony, that how you use it.)






You have at last convinced me of your density.
You are clearly a master at picking flyshit out of pepper.
You do not post links because that might indicate that you had read and understood the link.
I have chased down your suggestions and found that they are essentially language related. Some because there was no feminine title that was the equivalant of king so the title of king was used. Others the actual title was "warrant chief" and not king.
I have never said that women cannot or should not rule.
Of all of the women who have reigned as soverigns the percentage that you have pulled up with garbled gramatical use of the word king amount to what fractional percentage of the total?
I have not said that there were no women who were called kings I asked you to produce evidence of such and so far you have been quite successful in demonstrating your jejune infatuation with finding fault with anything I might say but unsuccessful in actually producing evidence.
When you point out a transgender model you are denying that the woman has actually taken on the identy of a man in a sort of double speak that she is really a woman but acting like a man so she is a man but she is a woman who is a king. Jesus fucking christ, try to pull your head out of your ass. This is a forum for adults try to discuss like one instead of posting up this puerile tripe.




thompsonx -> RE: Pelosi: Pursues Public Policy "in keeping with the values" of Jesus Christ, "The Word made Flesh (6/3/2010 11:34:11 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydawg

http://www.google.com/search?q=Female+kings&sourceid=ie7&rls=com.microsoft:en-us:IE-SearchBox&ie=&oe=



As usuall Thompson has no clue about what he is saying.

There have been Biologically Female kings for thousands of years.

15 seconds on Google.....




From the cite you posted:

June 27, 2007—Egypt's most famous female pharaoh—known for depictions showing her with a false beard—has been identified, Egyptian archaeologists announced today.

The body of Hatshepsut, who ruled ancient Egypt from 1473 to 1458 B.C., had been feared lost. But a mummy found decades ago in a rough tomb in the Valley of the Kings now appears to be the gender-bending queen.

Perhaps you should read before you snark


http://www.iupress.indiana.edu/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=406796

"An Igbo woman becomes king at a time of extraordinary change in Africa"

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2010/03/09/DI2010030903479.html

"Peggielene Bartels had been a Washington secretary for almost 30 years when the elders of an African village anointed her to be their king. "




Rather than wasting time repeating myself just read my post to ftd as it applies to you equally.




pahunkboy -> RE: Pelosi: Pursues Public Policy "in keeping with the values" of Jesus Christ, "The Word made Flesh (6/3/2010 12:59:31 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

She hasn't?

What about healthcare reform with the death panels?

And her attempts for a fake carbon tax?

You should re-think your reply.


Still coming with that tired shit ? Just think the right would rather have 'free market' 'God committees' something that really did exist rather then something from their partisan, political imagination...called death panels.

Your death panels now are called boards of directors at your hallowed for-profit health care insurance providers. If they don't approve your claim, well you can just go ahead and die. Better yet, we'll get our profits while in true capitalist form...somebody else pays for it.



We could return to a hill-burton standard. 

How would that be?

Check it out.




FatDomDaddy -> RE: Pelosi: Pursues Public Policy "in keeping with the values" of Jesus Christ, "The Word made Flesh (6/3/2010 7:12:45 PM)

OH.... Warrant Chief...she can't be king because she really a Warrant Chief.




thishereboi -> RE: Pelosi: Pursues Public Policy "in keeping with the values" of Jesus Christ, "The Word made Flesh (6/4/2010 6:36:56 AM)

quote:

Rather than wasting time repeating myself just read my post to ftd as it applies to you equally.


Yea, I read that. I liked the part where you said...
quote:

I have not said that there were no women who were called kings I asked you to produce evidence of such and so far you have been quite successful in demonstrating your jejune infatuation with finding fault with anything I might say but unsuccessful in actually producing evidence.


and yet just a few pages back, I found this...

quote:


When females rule they are called queen or empress not king nor emperor...it is called rules of grammar.


Now I realize it hasn't happened often, but it has happened. Changing your statement at this point won't change that.





thompsonx -> RE: Pelosi: Pursues Public Policy "in keeping with the values" of Jesus Christ, "The Word made Flesh (6/4/2010 8:14:10 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

Rather than wasting time repeating myself just read my post to ftd as it applies to you equally.


Yea, I read that. I liked the part where you said...
quote:

I have not said that there were no women who were called kings I asked you to produce evidence of such and so far you have been quite successful in demonstrating your jejune infatuation with finding fault with anything I might say but unsuccessful in actually producing evidence.


and yet just a few pages back, I found this...

quote:


When females rule they are called queen or empress not king nor emperor...it is called rules of grammar.


Now I realize it hasn't happened often, but it has happened. Changing your statement at this point won't change that.




Perhaps if you were to place that snippet back into the context of the discussion you would have a better understanding of this discussion.
If on the other hand you wish to pull out a single line and claim that is the totality of my position in this discussion then please, suit yourself.
Your intense desire to find anything to snark at me about offers a rather candid picture of your personality. That is, one who is more interested in picking fly shit out of pepper than discussion and the search for knowledge.




cuckoldmepls -> RE: Pelosi: Pursues Public Policy "in keeping with the values" of Jesus Christ, "The Word made Flesh (6/4/2010 8:27:16 AM)

The reason abortion crept into this thread is because your title implied that she was a leader based on Christian values. That couldn't be further from the truth. She 100% supports abortion under any circumstances, not just rape, incest or when the mother's life is in danger. Supporting mass genocide of helpless unborn children is about as far from supporting Christian values as you can get.

Her objective, like every liberal's objective, is to redistribute wealth, and reward people who are too lazy to work. Now she's on record telling musicians and artists that you will no longer have to work a regular job, since you will receive free health care.

These are not Christian values. Christian values are respecting biblical teachings whether you practice them 100% or not, recognizing the sanctity of life and that only God has the right to take life, and making an honest days wages. Not going out and buying a new car, while the rest of us pay for your health care.

www.apathetic-usa.com





rulemylife -> RE: Pelosi: Pursues Public Policy "in keeping with the values" of Jesus Christ, "The Word made Flesh (6/4/2010 8:32:39 AM)

I think she is a witch and a sorceress sent here by Satan himself to destroy our Christian country.

Let's burn her at the stake.






pahunkboy -> RE: Pelosi: Pursues Public Policy "in keeping with the values" of Jesus Christ, "The Word made Flesh (6/4/2010 8:34:33 AM)

I agree.




thompsonx -> RE: Pelosi: Pursues Public Policy "in keeping with the values" of Jesus Christ, "The Word made Flesh (6/4/2010 8:49:11 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: cuckoldmepls

The reason abortion crept into this thread is because your title implied that she was a leader based on Christian values. That couldn't be further from the truth. She 100% supports abortion under any circumstances, not just rape, incest or when the mother's life is in danger. Supporting mass genocide of helpless unborn children is about as far from supporting Christian values as you can get.


Are you completely comfortable with the gramatical consequences of this phrase?...mass genocide of helpless unborn children...
How is it possible to kill something that is unborn?

Her objective, like every liberal's objective, is to redistribute wealth, and reward people who are too lazy to work.

Do you mean like we do now by giving the wealth of the workers to the wealthy who are too lazy to work?

Now she's on record telling musicians and artists that you will no longer have to work a regular job, since you will receive free health care.

Free????I was under the impression that it would be taxpayer funded.

These are not Christian values. Christian values are respecting biblical teachings whether you practice them 100% or not, recognizing the sanctity of life and that only God has the right to take life,

So you are infavor of bringing the troops home and apologizing for murdering all of those arabs?


and making an honest days wages. Not going out and buying a new car, while the rest of us pay for your health care.

You are paying for mine so why not theirs?

www.apathetic-usa.com







Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625