thompsonx -> RE: Pelosi: Pursues Public Policy "in keeping with the values" of Jesus Christ, "The Word made Flesh (6/3/2010 11:32:29 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: FatDomDaddy quote:
ORIGINAL: thompsonx So far you have not produced one. A gentleman is called Mr. a lady is called Mrs. Miss or Ms. It is simple grammar not sexism...I find it difficult to believe that you are really this dense. But you are pressing a compelling arguement Ancients... try looking up the female kings in Ur or in Canaan, Medieval... Jadwiga of Poland or Christina of Sweden, Want modern ones.... Ahebi Ugbabe of the Enugu-Ezike in colonial Nigeria or Peggielene Bartels of Ghana today. As to Ancient Egypt, have an actual, female king, Khentykaues I of the 4th Dynasty. There is evidence for female kings in ancient European tribal cultures, Asian Cultures from Indian, China and Indo-China. Mesoamerica has evidence pointing to female kings as do Oceanic and Aboriginal Australian women who may have claimed the title king. So, thompsonx... a person can change their gender and you will argue they are the sex they choose but you deny a female monarch her choice to claim the title of king? And your reason is not sexism but grammar? How very Liberal of you. (Pssst… thompsonx,… a teaching moment… that last sentence, that is irony, that how you use it.) You have at last convinced me of your density. You are clearly a master at picking flyshit out of pepper. You do not post links because that might indicate that you had read and understood the link. I have chased down your suggestions and found that they are essentially language related. Some because there was no feminine title that was the equivalant of king so the title of king was used. Others the actual title was "warrant chief" and not king. I have never said that women cannot or should not rule. Of all of the women who have reigned as soverigns the percentage that you have pulled up with garbled gramatical use of the word king amount to what fractional percentage of the total? I have not said that there were no women who were called kings I asked you to produce evidence of such and so far you have been quite successful in demonstrating your jejune infatuation with finding fault with anything I might say but unsuccessful in actually producing evidence. When you point out a transgender model you are denying that the woman has actually taken on the identy of a man in a sort of double speak that she is really a woman but acting like a man so she is a man but she is a woman who is a king. Jesus fucking christ, try to pull your head out of your ass. This is a forum for adults try to discuss like one instead of posting up this puerile tripe.
|
|
|
|