Musicmystery
Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: NorthernGent quote:
ORIGINAL: Musicmystery Before I heard this argument (and granted, Panda, beyond an interesting take, nothing guarantees it would work as described), I'd have opposed mandatory voting too. Why herd the apathetic and ignorant to the polls? But his case for disenchanted voters has me reconsidering. Yes, it's a civic duty in my view, but as economist Buchanan pointed out, some people will weigh the benefits of doing other things vs. going to vote, especially if they see the process as holding little meaning. The problem with this is the coercion aspect.....which...as others have pointed out.....is anti-democratic. And really.....this is a more respectable version of the 'we must force the people to be free' line that middle class revolutionary leaders impose upon the wider population. You can't force people to exercise their stake in the nation.....they have to want to do it for themselves....whether disaffected....disinterested...or otherwise. The one thing we would all agree on is that political freedom is irretrievably bound up with the freedom to choose.....I'd take it on a step and say the freedom to make a choice with all of the information at hand.....but at the very least we'd agree on the freedom to choose. I understand the point, but characterizing it as coercion misrepresents the reality of democracy. We get to choose, and one of those choices could be the importance of participation in the elections. Just as we can't "choose" whether to be counted in the census (legally), as it's important to representation, so too is voting. If the group so decides, "coercion" becomes "complicance." As I mentioned earlier, I'd have been flatly against this before. But while granted, hardly conclusive, it's an interesting point that has me rethinking the merits. And at this point, polarization is so freezing up governance that some measure to address it will have to come about sooner or later, barring one group managing to finally seize one-party rule.
|