Musicmystery -> RE: Imagine there's no stock market... (6/6/2010 11:35:58 AM)
|
quote:
The stock market to me is rich man's games, a casino for those that like to gamble. The chips are people's livelihoods and families, money made and lost at the expense of people who have no say beyond being employed and getting a wage to ensure their and their familys survival on this planet during their nature given lifetime It is also an example of centralisation, something which is proving to be bad for us, but hey, rich men are making money, what is good for them has to be good for us, even when it's not. Nonsense. Play to trade and get rich quick, yeah, you're taking a risk and will probably get burned. Invest for the long term and you'll likely be fine, even with the ups and downs. Let's take that 30 years again and, say, Grandma subtee tells Auntie subbie to invest. "I can't afford to invest!" says Auntie sub. "You can take a lousy $25 a week, can't you?" demands Granny. Auntie doesn't want to argue, so just does it. To simply, let's just take yearly Dow averages, still an up and down ride at times, and certainly down in 2010: 1980 891.41 1981 932.92 1982 884.36 1983 1190.34 1984 1178.48 1985 1328.23 1986 1792.76 1987 2275.99 1988 2060.82 1989 2508.91 1990 2678.94 1991 2929.33 1992 3284.29 1993 3522.06 1994 3793.77 1995 4493.76 1996 5742.89 1997 7441.15 1998 8625.52 1999 10464.88 2000 10734.9 2001 10189.13 2002 9226.43 2003 10453 2004 10783 2005 10717 2006 12463 2007 13264.82 2008 11,197.29 2009 8,904.60 2010 10,523.13 Nonetheless, Auntie subbie would now have invested $39,550 in shares worth $149,591.99--even with the market down--378% of her original bucks. That's not even counting dividends or stock splits, and if I actually calculated this week to week instead of yearly, she'd be much further ahead, because she'd have bought more shares at low prices and fewer shares at high prices. Rich man's game? No. Always listen to Granny subtee. Btw, Uncle pahbie, who put his weekly $25 in silver, would have had a rougher ride: 1980 20.63 1981 10.52 1982 7.95 1983 11.44 1984 8.14 1985 6.14 1986 5.47 1987 7.01 1988 6.53 1989 5.5 1990 4.82 1991 4.04 1992 3.94 1993 4.3 1994 5.29 1995 5.15 1996 5.19 1997 4.89 1998 5.1 1999 5.22 2000 4.95 2001 4.37 2002 4.6 2003 4.85 2004 6.65 2005 7.31 2006 11.55 2007 13.38 2008 14.97 2009 14.68 2010 17.34 Today, he'd have just $109,881.21, only 73% of Auntie subbie's return, even though silver is now way up and stocks are now way down--Auntie's stocks STILL win (and if/when Uncle pahbie's silver returns to its long term historical value of around $5, he'll have just $31684.32--a 20% loss on his 30 years of investment). But how about Uncle Ani? Not trusting to a "rich man's game," he plops his weekly $25 into a trusty savings account at 1.4%, and in 30 years, has accrued a grand total of...$48,432. Unfortunately, since inflation likely exceeded 1.4%, it is worth less than his original investment once adjusted for inflation. But damn, did he ever beat the rich man!
|
|
|
|