SocratesNot -> RE: D/s vs. M/s ? (6/9/2010 8:57:57 AM)
|
OK, I'll tell you my opinion. In 24/7 D/s the submissive is totally obedient to the dominant in areas of working for the dominant, all types of BDSM scenes, running errands, being controlled sexually, all that has to do with sexuality, doing household chores, etc. but he is still a person for himself who has right to know all about the relationship, all about the intentions of the dominant, and has the right to pursue all of his goals and aspirations. For example - he may be kept in chastity, he will cook for her, he will give her massages, she can tie him up and spank him whenever she wants, she can do all sorts of sadomasochistic play with him, he will cater to all her whims and desires, he will repair her car, he will drive her wherever she wants to go etc, he will run errands for her, but once he does all of this HE IS COMPLETELY FREE TO DO WHATEVER HE WANTS AND TO PURSUE ALL OF HIS ASPIRATIONS, DREAMS, CAREER AND HOBBIES. She will NOT try to forcefully change his religious and political beliefs. She will NOT tell him what books to read, what music to listen to and what intellectual pursuits to engage in. She can suggest it, she can even demand it temporary as a form of play, but in long term he will always be free to engage his mind with anything he wants. Complete freedom of information, religious and political beliefs, spirituality and philosophy. He is the one who determines his identity. So, this is D/s in my opinion. This is type of relationship that I could be in, as a sub, with the right Domme. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In M/s, on the other hand - in theory, slave must do anything Master demands, and must ask for permission to do anything he wants himself. The permission can be given or not. Also, the slave doesn't have any rights unless Master decides that he has, and Master can control all slave's intellectual, religious, and other pursuits. So, slave's only IDENTITY is the identity that Master gives him. This may be almost the same as his own, natural identity, or totally different - but this is up to Master. In some cases the slave would benefit from total change of identity (if he was pretty much fucked up in the beginning, so any change would be for the better, even if it is totally radical), in some other cases (if the slave has strong and established identity and is very productive and independent before even entering relationship), radical changes of slave's identity and life philosophy would be detrimental to him. In such relationship I wouldn't be able to be, because I have too strong opinions and beliefs, and life philosophy and I wouldn't allow someone to change them and mold them. I also have very strong aspirations to achieve certain things in my life, and I wouldn't like anyone to try to prevent me in doing so.
|
|
|
|