brainiacsub
Posts: 1209
Joined: 11/11/2007
From: San Antonio, TX
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Malkinius
Greetings brainiacsub....
quote:
ORIGINAL: brainiacsub
Malkinius,
I'm not trying to be argumentative or intentionally obtuse. Unlike Jeff, I did study Neural Science (actually, Molecular Biology with subspecialties in Neural Science and Genetics) and although I found your discussion interesting, it was also entirely irrelevant. One does not need to understand the biochemistry of learning to make a case for or discuss brainwashing or "mind control" techniques, any more than one needs to know biochem to understand love.
Your second post about cults and Stockholm Syndrome was much closer to the spirit of this thread, but as I already pointed out, again irrelevant. Subs dropping their panties for nice looking doms is much closer to the truth. No brainwashing required.
Outstanding. I really would like to talk to you about that but not among the garbage that most of this thread has become.
What I was talking about was irrelevant to what the OP may have been trying and failing to do. It is very relevant to what I do. It does also explain bits of his claims if there is basis to them. I agree that good looks, something I rather lack, will cause many dropped panties. <grins> However, what is the mechanism behind causing them to drop? That is the realm I have been dealing with so yes, it still come back to the topic and is connected.
We can discuss them with or without the underlying mechanisms of how they can occur. We can also talk about love and the oxytocin cascade in the same conversation. Actually, we can do all of that together. <grins> There are real connections. My point right now is without an understanding of the how the what can not be fully discussed. Yes, I know we do that all the time. Does that mean we should? No, CM forums are not the best place to do it. Do you have a better place?
Be well....
Malkinius
Malkinius, sorry I didn't respond earlier but I left this thread and didn't come back to it until now. As I have already stated, I don't believe one needs to understand the biochemistry behind brain activity in order to understand behavior and emotions and how to manipulate them. Unless you are an academic and doing pure research, I fail to see the point. You would be better served looking at this from a psychology or maybe even psychiatric perspective than purely biocemistry. That's kind of like saying one cannot master driving the automobile until one understands the engineering behind internal combustion engines. Few would take you seriously. I disagree with your statement that I bolded above. A deeply scientific discussion with you regarding neurotransmitters, synapses, receptors, etc., can be quite daunting and time consuming if you haven't had the requisite education. You can PM me and I'll listen to what you have to say and we'll take it from there.
If you are trying to understand why women swoon, then I disagree with you that these forums are not the correct vehicle to understand this. The opinions of many women and their collective experiences would be far more valuable to your research than my very limited adventures. You can respond here, or send me a cmail.
|
RE: The dangers of mind control. - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread