|
luckyslaveboync -> RE: Feminization as humiliation? (4/17/2006 3:43:44 PM)
|
Feminization of males is only anti-woman if one wishes to see it that way. For lucky and lucky's Owner, it is simply one of many methods to indulge Her sense of control, since it is not something lucky enjoys particularly but does when She orders it. lucky experiences it as submissive but not humiliating as it has only been done in private thus far. With another of Her slaves who does enjoy sissification, it is a different form of control, part of what She and many Dommes like: developing the sub to be 'all that he can be." This slave does profess to experience it as humiliation even in private. If it increases the control of the woman, lucky does not see how it can be seen as anti-woman. If the particular woman did not enjoy these forms of control, then it would not be done, but allowing different women to enjoy different things is only common sense and should not be inconsistent with feminism, imho.
|
|
|
|
