|
splorff -> RE: Is Sexual Preference a Function of Vision? (6/16/2010 12:23:07 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth
beth and I were playing around last night, having fun, and enjoying our usual good time being with each other when once again started to get silly and reopen our ongoing discussion about gender biased sexuality. The discussion is centered on the question; does knowing the gender of your partner affect your reaction to their sexual stimulation? Blindfolded or on one side of a curtain where you could not ascertain the gender of the person on the other side of it (which excludes participants with facial hair unfortunately) and not knowing who was touching you, could you enjoy the sensation and evaluate pragmatically which was better?
We refer to the experiment as 'The Pepsi Challenge'. Those with not enough laps around the sun - click on the link to appreciate the reference.
On one side of the curtain are self professed "experts" in manual and/or oral stimulation, some the same sex as you, some not. On the other side, blindfolded, is you. The expert is given 2 minutes to use their best moves. To keep the test 'honest', your regular partner is excluded from participating. You get 5 minutes of 'recuperation' time between sessions. At the end you rank the experiences in order from worst to best.
If the result was that more favorable sensations were produced by the same gender would you consider changing your confirmed orientation to include a same sex partner without being blindfolded?
Of course a corollary theory comes into play with this experiment. The theory being that the person best able, and with the most knowledge, of how to please you would be a same sex parter since he or she would know first hand (or first mouth) what feels best.
Theories which, unfortunately, I don't think I'll ever see tested because although we have a lot of 'open minded' friends, I don't think many would subject themselves to experiment on either side of the curtain.
We're having a little start of summer party at the end of the month with a few CM friends, who knows - this may be the appropriate opportunity to stage such an experiment. I know it will be more fun to watch than 5 pounds of wax melting in a crock pot which was the group game planned for the last party! A bit quicker too as to avoid the 10PM PVE outside fun curfew!
I think I'd be willing to put on the blindfold. beth would - but only because I ordered her too; but that's more a function of her not enjoying the act in the first place let alone the thought of someone serving her.
So, just for fun regardless of your gender or orientation, given the opportunity would you submit to the 'challenge'?
Not entirely.
Some academics did something in the UK that will interest you. Six men wore their clothes all day long. Next their underwear was taken from them. We call them pants, but you call trousers pants. Just in case you are still unsure, how about knickers, grundies, or smalls. I mean the things that keep your bum, sorry, - fanny warm. Don’t say that over here, it’s something rude this side of the pond.
We really should get a phrase book.
Anyway, the grundies wre placed into separate plastic bags. After a while, six women were asked to smell each grundy, and announce which one she like best, based only on aroma.
Next the women and men are introduced to each other and allowed to mingle for some time. Then each woman is asked which man she was attracted to/liked best.
Result: close correlation between choice of grundy, and choice of man.
They did the whole thing the other way around , with similar results.
So there you are, visual attraction we know is important, but strangely, for some anyway, the way someone smells is also important.
Its not news to me at all. Sometimes a womans body perfume is really nice to me, and sometimes not so. But with poor personal hygiene. I don’t like anyones !
|
|
|
|
