RE: Is Sexual Preference a Function of Vision?

RE: Is Sexual Preference a Function of Vision? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

AQuietSimpleMan -> RE: Is Sexual Preference a Function of Vision? (6/17/2010 12:30:17 AM)
Okay so how do we put this.... It has already been said but I think that too many words were used. So I am the Blinfolded one. I am blown by 3 guys and 2 girls. I vote in order of greatness and 1-4-5-3-2 And 1, 4, & 5 are the guys. Sure they were great BlowJobs but I'm just not attracted to guys. Best Sex in the world I ever had was in a Swinger Club on New Years Eve with the Ugliest woman I have ever met, I mean she made me cum in ways that they only describe in the Kama-Sutra but at the end of the night when she asked if I wanted to go to breakfast at her apartment I said the sex was great but I wasn't interested in anything more than what we did. Attraction is important, and if a member of the female persuasion who was simply majorly unattractive wasn't going to make the cut as a perspective partner, what chance does a member of the male persuasion have? I am sure Men are better at pleasing men than some women are..... I would rather teach the female than take a shortcut with a male. QSM

SimplyMichael -> RE: Is Sexual Preference a Function of Vision? (6/17/2010 12:58:20 AM)
I don't pick partners based on their sexual skills, I can teach all of that. There is a certain quality certain women have that inspires lust in me, very few have it, I can't even quite describe it but I know it isn't something I can teach. When in the presence of such a OMFG. I have topped men before but it is a technical exercise, about like playing with a woman who doesn't do it for me. With the woman I love lying there with her in my arms is hotter than getting a blowjob from chick I don't love.

splorff -> RE: Is Sexual Preference a Function of Vision? (6/17/2010 3:28:04 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: daddysprop247 quote: ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth you and beth have a LOT in common! For her direct clitoral stimulation is a form of torture and not pleasurable. wow! now i don't feel quite so strange. [:D] An ex of mine was this way too. As a child she took a spill on her push bike. She landed clitoris first on the handle bars. OUCHIES. She could not bear to be touched there by fingers, but tongues were ok

splorff -> RE: Is Sexual Preference a Function of Vision? (6/17/2010 3:50:00 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: IronBear a large sheet of heavy duty industrial black plastic and a couple of litres of good tasty oil and naked bodies on the plastic with only one red candle and some incense burning. You can set the parameters if you like such as no penetration it is all fine just lots of groping and grovelling and getting down and dirty.... Certainly makes for a good Meet & Greet or just a getting to know you guys. Now that sounds like my sort of party ! I didn't know banana benders had so much fun down there !

IronBear -> RE: Is Sexual Preference a Function of Vision? (6/17/2010 4:19:14 AM)
My second wife and I along with her bi girlfriend who lived you us used to have these parties when I was living in Perth Western Australia. haven't seen much of the swing or other adult play scene here in Queensland 'cause I was working most nights keeping the populace and police safe from bad guys.. These days age is dead against me finding folks who may want to get involved.

DomImus -> RE: Is Sexual Preference a Function of Vision? (6/17/2010 7:20:55 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Jeffff I am pretty sure Halle Berry would be pleasurable for me. For a few minutes last night I was wishing I was Billy Bob Thornton.

Page: << < prev 1 2 3 [4]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125