daddysprop247
Posts: 1712
Joined: 6/24/2005
From: DC Metro area
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth
beth and I were playing around last night, having fun, and enjoying our usual good time being with each other when once again started to get silly and reopen our ongoing discussion about gender biased sexuality. The discussion is centered on the question; does knowing the gender of your partner affect your reaction to their sexual stimulation? Blindfolded or on one side of a curtain where you could not ascertain the gender of the person on the other side of it (which excludes participants with facial hair unfortunately) and not knowing who was touching you, could you enjoy the sensation and evaluate pragmatically which was better?
We refer to the experiment as 'The Pepsi Challenge'. Those with not enough laps around the sun - click on the link to appreciate the reference.
On one side of the curtain are self professed "experts" in manual and/or oral stimulation, some the same sex as you, some not. On the other side, blindfolded, is you. The expert is given 2 minutes to use their best moves. To keep the test 'honest', your regular partner is excluded from participating. You get 5 minutes of 'recuperation' time between sessions. At the end you rank the experiences in order from worst to best.
If the result was that more favorable sensations were produced by the same gender would you consider changing your confirmed orientation to include a same sex partner without being blindfolded?
Of course a corollary theory comes into play with this experiment. The theory being that the person best able, and with the most knowledge, of how to please you would be a same sex parter since he or she would know first hand (or first mouth) what feels best.
Theories which, unfortunately, I don't think I'll ever see tested because although we have a lot of 'open minded' friends, I don't think many would subject themselves to experiment on either side of the curtain.
We're having a little start of summer party at the end of the month with a few CM friends, who knows - this may be the appropriate opportunity to stage such an experiment. I know it will be more fun to watch than 5 pounds of wax melting in a crock pot which was the group game planned for the last party! A bit quicker too as to avoid the 10PM PVE outside fun curfew!
I think I'd be willing to put on the blindfold. beth would - but only because I ordered her too; but that's more a function of her not enjoying the act in the first place let alone the thought of someone serving her.
So, just for fun regardless of your gender or orientation, given the opportunity would you submit to the 'challenge'?
unless told to do so by my Master, no i would not wish to submit to such a challenge. first i disagree strongly with the theory that people sexually respond to physical stimulation independently of all other factors. but perhaps that is because i am someone who is not aroused by ANY physical stimulation outside of context. in fact i have never become physically aroused due to physical stimulation alone. nor does my arousal depend on anything superficial like vision. in order to be aroused i would need to know that i am with a man, that that man is enjoying being with me, that i am pleasing him and serving him well, that he is comfortable with me, etc. i need that purely masculine, primal and selfish male sexuality in order to have a chance in heck of being physically aroused...what is happening to me physically can only enhance what has already been created by this caveman-esque Man/woman atmosphere.
this is also temporarily laying outside the fact that someone trying to touch me or do anything to me with the intent of "stimulating" me is about as big a turn-off as it gets.
|
RE: Is Sexual Preference a Function of Vision? - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread