willbeurdaddy
Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Musicmystery Not at all. This is just silly. Roll and point if it pleases you. First, "why didn't Obama do anything about BP," then comparing this to Nixon's criminal activity and overt admission that he thought himself above the law, legally? Not to mention you're cherry picking, and rather bizarrely, from my much wider, non-partisan observation about the thread--obstructionism. quote:
ORIGINAL: Musicmystery The wider point I'd make is that obstructionism is hurting the U.S. Deliberately holding up appointees, for example, as has happened over the past few administrations, over matters not even related to the appointee, is indefensible. Someone is going to have to step in to change the rules. But more generally, used to be, decades ago, people sat down with the opposition and worked out compromises. Now the feeling is that if an opposing view didn't win, the problem was we didn't oppose strictly enough. It has become about power at all costs. Even the justice system has become overtly politicized over the past decade. The only check is the American people (remember the permanent Republican majority?), but even here, the trend is toward not saner government, but toward opposition of government--essentially a desire for mob rule. Just look at the rhetoric in many threads here. Will it change? Not in November, however the elections go--that will only change the names on the same old patterns. 1. You raised Nixon being above the law. Nothing Nixon did came close to being as illegal and as potentially costly to the US as his strongarming of BP. 2. the Dems brought obstructionism to new heights during GWBs administration. To have a thread about Republican obstructionism is the height of absurdity.
|