BonesFromAsh
Posts: 1362
Joined: 6/17/2010 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: sunshinemiss The internet has created a whole new world of information - accurate and not. Ain't that the truth. We've become a group of Wikipedia experts. I take what I find on the internet, and CM in particular, with a grain of salt. There have been many threads, usually diet or health related ones, that will have inaccurate info. The most recent one was on the Ask a Master forum where a person told the OP, who wanted to bruise but couldn't, to take a regiment of baby asprin for a certain number of days to thin the blood. While baby asprin does thin the blood, it can cause other complications depending on the patient's medicial history. Incomplete information is just as dangerous as inaccurate. Where is the line for you as far as clearing up inaccurate information? There have been times I've posted correct information, along with the appropriate links, when the inaccuracy was blatant. Most of the time, though, I leave it to the reader to use their own brain power. Is there a line? My personal line depends on how involved I want to become with the online discussion (We're talking online, right?) I don't see it as a duty to correct people, even when it is blatant and I may have some expertise in that particular area. To be honest, in the past, I have tried that approach and it backfired in my face because people called into question my personal/professional experience. I don't feel the need to justify myself and my career choice/certification with online strangers. In order to maintain my privacy, which I value more than my need to post information, I have chosen to avoid certain discussions. Am I the only one who thinks about this stuff? No, you're not. Again, I guess it depends on how involved you want to be with the topic at hand.
|