ArtCatDom
Posts: 478
Joined: 1/20/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: caitlyn As usual, your points are very well thought out Mr. Warren. Part of the difficulty with this discussion is the way people instantly make militarists out of anyone simply speaking the cold hard facts. I think war is to be avoided if at all possible. I think this war in Iraq is very foolish. I think we should try to work with other nations towards the end of gaining peaceful solutions to our problems. That said, there is a concept that is hard to dispute, although many will try. When you read history, you can't help notice that militarily strong nations, can survive corruption, economic disaster, madman leadership, natural disasters, degenerate societies, poor political skill, and many other things. You also notice the militarily weak, not surviving very long. at all. The idea that corrupt businesses, poor political skill, etc, etc, etc ... will doom the United States, is very possible, but according to history, not probably, while we have such a strong military. What history books are you reading? Ever hear of a military junta? Howabout those military dictatorships? What about those dictatorships that were enforced by storng militaries (which is nearly all of them)? A weak military tends to lead towards being pushed around or conquered. This is not always true however it is by far the norm. A strong military tends to lead towards imperialistic behavior and consolidation of power. Again, not always true, but certainly the norm. I think the founding fathers of America had the right idea. Avoid the great authortarian dangers of a standing military by depending on a well-armed, well-guided and well-trained militia. (For reference, being well trained and directed is almost exactly the meaning of the Constitutional phrase "well-regulated", which means kept in good working order.) *meow*
|