Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Presidential ranking: FDR the best, Obama #15, George W. among the worst


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Presidential ranking: FDR the best, Obama #15, George W. among the worst Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Presidential ranking: FDR the best, Obama #15, George W... - 7/1/2010 10:22:47 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

The 238 participating presidential scholars round out the top five in order with Theodore Roosevelt, Abraham Lincoln, George Washington and Thomas Jefferson. Teddy Roosevelt had, more than any other president the “right stuff”, and tops the collective ranking of a cluster of personal qualities including imagination, integrity, intelligence, luck, background, and being willing to take risks. Lincoln, according to the experts, demonstrated the greatest presidential abilities while FDR ranks first in overall accomplishments.


quote:

Over two hundred presidential scholars ranked the 43 U.S. Presidents on six personal attributes (background, imagination, integrity, intelligence, luck and willingness to take risks), five forms of ability (compromising, executive, leadership, communication and overall) and eight areas of accomplishment including economic, other domestic affairs, working with Congress and their party, appointing supreme court justices and members of the executive branch, avoiding mistakes and foreign policy.


Other notables...

The current president, Barack Obama, while highly rated on imagination (6th), communication ability (7th) and intelligence (8th) scores poorly on background (family, education and experience) and enters the survey in the 15th position.

George W. Bush, had entered the survey at 23rd when the study was last conducted one year into his first term. Today, just one year after leaving office, the former president has found himself in the bottom five at 39th rated especially poorly in handling the economy, communication, ability to compromise, foreign policy accomplishments and intelligence.

Rounding out the bottom five are four presidents that have held that dubious distinction each time the survey has been conducted: Andrew Johnson, James Buchanan, Warren G. Harding, and Franklin Pierce.

Andrew Johnson leads the ‘worst ever’ in both abilities and accomplishments finishing below both Buchanan and Harding, but Harding tops the worst in personal attributes including integrity where he finishes just slightly ahead of Richard M. Nixon.

“Aside from the newest entry in the “Bottom Five”, George W. Bush, the others have a firm hold on this ignominious distinction. Three, Pierce, Buchanan and Andrew Johnson wrap around one of our finest presidents, Abe Lincoln and those three perennial poorly ranked are held responsible for a failure to avert the Civil War in the case of Pierce and Buchanan, and perhaps even more shamefully in Johnson, prolonging the national disgrace with a prejudiced, Jim Crow, reconstruction,” according to Professor Tom Kelly, Professor of History and American Studies, emeritus Siena College and the study’s other director. “Harding, well, no one appreciates corruption nor accepts ineptitude as an excuse.”


Bill Clinton, now nearly ten years removed from the White House, moved upwards in the rankings from 18th overall in 2002 to 13th today. Clinton moved up the list based on improving ratings of his background and his executive appointments but continued to be haunted by his integrity and failure to avoid critical mistakes. G. H. Bush’s legacy held constant with the one term Bush fixed at 22nd.

Ronald Reagan dropped two places from 16th overall in 2002 to 18th today. Still, Reagan remains highly regarded for his luck, party leadership, communication ability, relationship with Congress and his leadership ability.

Jimmy Carter, despite continuing visibility and philanthropic efforts, dropped from 25th in 2002 to 32nd in 2010. Carter’s high suit is his enviable integrity rating (7th) but he draws low marks for his handling of the economy, relationship with Congress, party leadership, luck, executive and leadership abilities and his failure to avoid crucial mistakes.

Among other historically recent presidents, Gerald Ford held steady at 28th, Richard Nixon dropped four spots from 26th to 30th, Lyndon Johnson, rated number one for his relationship with Congress, fell one place from 15th to 16th, and John Kennedy climbed three spots from 14th to 11th. Kennedy continues to be highly regarded for his communication (4th), ability to compromise (6th), executive appointments (6th), imagination (7th) and his handling of the U.S. economy (7th).


http://uticadailynews.com/utica_daily_focus/15514-Presidential-ranking-FDR-the-best-Obama-George-among-the-worst.html

I ended up posting most if not all of the article. I found it interesting and wondered if anyone else agrees or disagrees and why.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Presidential ranking: FDR the best, Obama #15, Geor... - 7/1/2010 11:24:28 AM   
Fellow


Posts: 1486
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
Obama clearly should not be included: too early to make any assessments. 

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Presidential ranking: FDR the best, Obama #15, Geor... - 7/1/2010 11:28:45 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
On that i completely agree. Way too soon to evaluate his performance.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Fellow)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Presidential ranking: FDR the best, Obama #15, Geor... - 7/1/2010 11:35:15 AM   
LaTigresse


Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Fellow

Obama clearly should not be included: too early to make any assessments. 


Agreed.



_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to Fellow)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Presidential ranking: FDR the best, Obama #15, Geor... - 7/1/2010 1:22:42 PM   
AsmodaisSin


Posts: 320
Joined: 7/28/2009
From: NOVA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Fellow

Obama clearly should not be included: too early to make any assessments. 


That I can agree on. 


_____________________________

Something so symbolic seeps from silence.

(in reply to Fellow)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Presidential ranking: FDR the best, Obama #15, Geor... - 7/1/2010 2:08:05 PM   
Jeffff


Posts: 12600
Joined: 7/7/2007
Status: offline
Wow..... me too.

If folks are gonna agree, this thread will need to be moved.

I am thinking....humor?

_____________________________

"If you don't live it, it won't come out your horn." Charlie Parker

(in reply to AsmodaisSin)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Presidential ranking: FDR the best, Obama #15, Geor... - 7/1/2010 2:40:21 PM   
LaTigresse


Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline
Something..........although, maybe the  far right nutters just haven't found it yet. Still potential to be interesting there. 

_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to Jeffff)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Presidential ranking: FDR the best, Obama #15, Geor... - 7/1/2010 2:52:12 PM   
xBullx


Posts: 4206
Joined: 10/8/2005
Status: offline
My bet is, if the Wall Street Journal did this same survey, poll or editorial opinion their list would be rather different.

Sure would be neat to see something like this that had no political leanings.

_____________________________

Live well,

Bull



I'm not an asshole; I'm simply resolute...

"A Republic, If You Can Keep It."

Caution: My humor is a bit skewed.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Presidential ranking: FDR the best, Obama #15, Geor... - 7/1/2010 3:08:26 PM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
The primary problem, with ranking presidents, is, often not basing it on reality. Yes, we have quite the selection of evidence, to view Carter, Reagan, Bush (Sr), Clinton, Bush (Jr), and even Obama. There are people, whom are living today, that have met one or more of these gentleman, and can retell the issues. TV, radio, and newspaper publications on their daily struggles can be found in volumes. There are people that will push one or more presidents, as being 'the best', and those who are the 'worst'. This could be by the person's individual thoughts, or simply how they vote (i.e. a Democrats rates Democrat Presidents as better).

A person like President Washington, Adams, or Jackson, are only listed in history under limited knowledge. They were not interviewed on TV, cable, or the Internet (or even youttube.com). There was not even the scale of reporters, and pseudo-reporters (i.e. Fox News), hounding any of these men. Nor, is there anyone living today, that had met these men in person and could retell their impression of the person.

Yes, we as Americans, have our favorite American Presidents. For all sorts of reasons. But to try to rank/rate them in a fashion, without taking in to account the above thoughts, is simply silly. It becomes a popularity contest, not a contest based solely on merit (like each of these contests seeks to portray).


(in reply to xBullx)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Presidential ranking: FDR the best, Obama #15, Geor... - 7/2/2010 5:20:30 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

The primary problem, with ranking presidents, is, often not basing it on reality. Yes, we have quite the selection of evidence, to view Carter, Reagan, Bush (Sr), Clinton, Bush (Jr), and even Obama. There are people, whom are living today, that have met one or more of these gentleman, and can retell the issues. TV, radio, and newspaper publications on their daily struggles can be found in volumes. There are people that will push one or more presidents, as being 'the best', and those who are the 'worst'. This could be by the person's individual thoughts, or simply how they vote (i.e. a Democrats rates Democrat Presidents as better).

A person like President Washington, Adams, or Jackson, are only listed in history under limited knowledge. They were not interviewed on TV, cable, or the Internet (or even youttube.com). There was not even the scale of reporters, and pseudo-reporters (i.e. Fox News), hounding any of these men. Nor, is there anyone living today, that had met these men in person and could retell their impression of the person.

Yes, we as Americans, have our favorite American Presidents. For all sorts of reasons. But to try to rank/rate them in a fashion, without taking in to account the above thoughts, is simply silly. It becomes a popularity contest, not a contest based solely on merit (like each of these contests seeks to portray).





I think anyone still alive should not even be on the list.
History gives us a pretty good look at the dead ones.

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Presidential ranking: FDR the best, Obama #15, Geor... - 7/4/2010 9:46:56 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: xBullx

My bet is, if the Wall Street Journal did this same survey, poll or editorial opinion their list would be rather different.

Sure would be neat to see something like this that had no political leanings.
So it's your belief that were the WSJ to pose the same questions....and ask the same 238 Presidential historians,uasing the same criteria and guidelines as The Utican Daily News did...the answers would be different?
Or perhaps your asserting that the WSJ criteria and guidelines might be quite different ? Hell the WSJ might just go and find themselves 238 different Presidential Historians.......Do we actually have that many Presidential historians floating around?
How do all of these guys support themselves?

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to xBullx)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Presidential ranking: FDR the best, Obama #15, Geor... - 7/5/2010 7:31:51 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
Great post, Tazzy. My concern is that Harry Truman is not mentioned in the article. He was confronted with an enormous task when he entered office upon FDR's death. Was not even aware of the Manhatten Project and yet made the most controversial decision in hindsight to drop the Bomb on Hiroshima and again on Nagasaki. Harry was a tough little guy. I thought he should rank pretty high on the list.

_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 12
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Presidential ranking: FDR the best, Obama #15, George W. among the worst Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.063