Moonhead -> RE: Are Men Becoming Irrelevant? (7/6/2010 12:53:42 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: vincentML quote:
ORIGINAL: xBullx quote:
ORIGINAL: vincentML It is kind of difficult to reduce this to one simple question other then to ask you what impact do you perceive if the trend continues full throttle into the future? In the alternative, what disagreement do you have with the premise and the propositions I have laid out? We, no matter who we are, are only made great or irrelevant at the efforts, or lack thereof, of our own hands. Life is cyclical and therefore when allowed to progress it seems to always restore natural balance. Each gender has it's place within the natural design, we can deny that, we can attempt to disprove it, we can try to fight it, we can even try and fool it, often accomplishing little more than fooling ourselves in the process. But nature cares little about our delusion of self importance; neither men nor women will ever be irrelevant to one another, that is nature's intent and if balance fails so then will the species. Just one man's opinion...... Interesting point, Bull. But suppose we are no longer in nature, we are socialized, and the "natural design" no longer means dick. That was the point of the article. Economic forces are rendering the natural design moot. The natural design has been flouted for a very long time now, in any case. Who thinks it's natural for any kind of animal to be sleeping eight hours a day and cooking its food? Anybody on here been crippled by a dose of polio or rickets? I have always found the spectacle of people who are quite happy to spend a fortune on having their teeth fixed or making sure that their kids get all of their shots having the brass neck to argue about the natural order of things in a few specific cases where it suits them pretty disgusting. The natural order of things extends a lot further than gender roles, I'm afraid.
|
|
|
|