truckinslave
Posts: 3897
Joined: 6/16/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
His wife keeping her client list secret means parties in front of the court can never be sure if Thomas does have an actual conflict Silliness. Justice Thomas owns a home, I suppose- should he have recused himself from the Ct eminent domain case? If he has a friend that owns shares in an insurance company, is he disqualified from hearing a case involving insurance reform? The point being that the public can never be sure. Which is why the primary responsibility, and often the only responsibility, for effecting the necessary recusal, lies with the judge himself. Besides, if the donors are truly secret- and we have no reason beyond paranoia to suspect they are not- then Justice Thomas is as blind as Lady Justice. You could always lead a movement to have him impeached. Good luck, Quixote.
|