Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? - 7/14/2010 3:03:33 PM   
Vendaval


Posts: 10297
Joined: 1/15/2005
Status: offline
If you read the linked pdf it is very basic body parts and function information, see page 36.

IME, by this age youngsters are asking basic questions and need basic answers. In addition, parents and teachers are having to teach them about "safe touch" and not wandering off with strangers.



"Kindergarten"

Introduce basic reproductive body parts (penis, vagina, breast, nipples,
testicles, scrotum, uterus)

Understand that a baby grows in a woman’s uterus.

Concepts will be introduced by a school nurse, Health Instructional Coach
or physician prior to grade 4."

http://www.helena.k12.mt.us/images/documents/curriculum/HealthCurriculum/K12FinalHealth.pdf

*format edit



< Message edited by Vendaval -- 7/14/2010 3:05:40 PM >


_____________________________

"Beware, the woods at night, beware the lunar light.
So in this gray haze we'll be meating again, and on that
great day, I will tease you all the same."
"WOLF MOON", OCTOBER RUST, TYPE O NEGATIVE


http://KinkMeet.co.uk

(in reply to VirginPotty)
Profile   Post #: 101
RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? - 7/14/2010 3:04:45 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
In other words....and as usual....a tempest in a teapot!

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to Vendaval)
Profile   Post #: 102
RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? - 7/14/2010 3:06:59 PM   
Slavehandsome


Posts: 382
Joined: 9/19/2004
Status: offline
I believe the correct analogy is, a Wolf in Sheep's clothing.

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 103
RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? - 7/14/2010 3:07:32 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
at what age do boys find out they have a dink? (helpful hint: real early)
at what age do girls squat on a mirror to have a look? (helpful hint: real early)

understand that by this time you are  filling in blanks to what they already know and talk about amongst themselves.

you are not building grand palace kingdom doors here,  you are just making sure they get built square, plumb and flush.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Vendaval)
Profile   Post #: 104
RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? - 7/14/2010 3:07:55 PM   
angelikaJ


Posts: 8641
Joined: 6/22/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: AsmodaisSin

quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

quote:

ORIGINAL: AsmodaisSin

quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

Okay, let's look at this from a different angle. If a parent only wants to feed their child one meal a day.....who is responsible when that child has severe health issues or starves to death?

I mean, come on, it's their kid, their responsibility, they should be allowed to parent that kid ANY WAY THEY WANT right?!?!?



Neglecting your child and their health is a little different from having the option to opt out of a sex-ed program because you feel that it's your parental duty to do it on your own time.  I mean really.  Are we seriously trying to compare these things?



Ah yeah. Because I gotta tell ya, most people I know that were sexually abused or molested as a child would have preferred missing a meal now and then to what they did suffer.



Because jumping to these extreme concepts is the best way you can defend yourself.  That's brilliant.  Most people do not molest their children.  Most people would probably look at the sex ed program and sigh in relief because they don't have to go through the awkwardness of explaining. 

If ever I am a parent, I want the option to opt out.  Plain and simple.  The fact that the school might have the audacity to tell me, as a one day parent, that I have no right to opt out, I will remove my child from the school and go to another place or home school. 



You left out what to me was the most important part of LaT's quote:
"I don't see neglecting their mental well being via education as any less a crime than neglecting their nutritional health."

And you are right most parents don't molest their children... but some do.

So, a hypothetical parent who does molest can simply opt out of the lesson plan and you are ok with that? Because we are not just talking about your future children to be, we are also talking about that child... and the child whose parents never discuss sex because their child is too innocent for such things, only the neighbor down the street has already taken away that child's innocence.

I do understand where you are coming from, but your need for an individual choice does keep other children at risk of harm.




_____________________________

The original home of the caffeinated psychotic hair pixies.
(as deemed by He who owns me)

http://www.collarchat.com/m_3234821/tm.htm

30 fluffy points!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQjuCQd01sg

(in reply to AsmodaisSin)
Profile   Post #: 105
RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? - 7/14/2010 3:09:37 PM   
Vendaval


Posts: 10297
Joined: 1/15/2005
Status: offline
This sounds much like the method my parochial school used for 4th, 5th and 6th graders. Except the girls had a "tea" and slide show with their mothers. Afterwards I remember getting free sanitary napkin samples in the mail.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

The funny thing is, I remember when I was in grade school, having a sex ed class in gym. I don't remember how old, 5th or 6th grade.


I went to school outside Atlanta and for us it was 6th grade and I remember it because it was done in gender segregated classes and we only got stuff about our bodies and then a bunch of scare stuff about disease and pregnancy. It was pretty pathetic.




_____________________________

"Beware, the woods at night, beware the lunar light.
So in this gray haze we'll be meating again, and on that
great day, I will tease you all the same."
"WOLF MOON", OCTOBER RUST, TYPE O NEGATIVE


http://KinkMeet.co.uk

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 106
RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? - 7/14/2010 3:12:29 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
Oh god! I remember those too, only we got them at school, in pink bags, and had to deal with the horrible teasing from the boys. Some memories should just... not be memories.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Vendaval)
Profile   Post #: 107
RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? - 7/14/2010 3:12:46 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Slavehandsome

I believe the correct analogy is, a Wolf in Sheep's clothing.
I always thought  that even a broken clock was right twice a day.....you seem to be living proof that this is not so.

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to Slavehandsome)
Profile   Post #: 108
RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? - 7/14/2010 3:13:50 PM   
LaTigresse


Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: angelikaJ

You left out what to me was the most important part of LaT's quote:
"I don't see neglecting their mental well being via education as any less a crime than neglecting their nutritional health."

And you are right most parents don't molest their children... but some do.

So, a hypothetical parent who does molest can simply opt out of the lesson plan and you are ok with that? Because we are not just talking about your future children to be, we are also talking about that child... and the child whose parents never discuss sex because their child is too innocent for such things, only the neighbor down the street has already taken away that child's innocence.

I do understand where you are coming from, but your need for an individual choice does keep other children at risk of harm.



Not to mention, the neighbours kids might then take away your child's innocence because they didn't know that what was done to them was inappropriate therefor, when playing in the playhouse, did it to your, unaware child.


_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to angelikaJ)
Profile   Post #: 109
RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? - 7/14/2010 3:13:57 PM   
Slavehandsome


Posts: 382
Joined: 9/19/2004
Status: offline
Maybe we should call him for what he is "A Bush In Obama's Clothing".

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 110
RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? - 7/14/2010 3:16:33 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Slavehandsome

Maybe we should call him for what he is "A Bush In Obama's Clothing".
Or...and this is a radical thought,you could ask the young lady to take her foot off your throat....thereby allowing some much needed oxygen to rush to your,obviously in distress,brain.

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to Slavehandsome)
Profile   Post #: 111
RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? - 7/14/2010 3:19:29 PM   
Vendaval


Posts: 10297
Joined: 1/15/2005
Status: offline
I agree very much with this statement. The peer pressure and over-saturation with sexual images in the media guarantee that young people growing up now are exposed to a barrage of sexual behaviors and images long before puberty starts. Sending them out to face the world without basic information about their bodies and how to protect themselves is neglect.

quote:

ORIGINAL: calamitysandra

I would go so far as to say that not teaching kindergarteners at least the basics of body parts, sex, unwanted touches, and privacy violations is a form of child endangerment.

In a bid to keep kids innocent (why the hell takes knowledge about their body innocence away?), they are made/kept vulnerable. Knowledge is power.



_____________________________

"Beware, the woods at night, beware the lunar light.
So in this gray haze we'll be meating again, and on that
great day, I will tease you all the same."
"WOLF MOON", OCTOBER RUST, TYPE O NEGATIVE


http://KinkMeet.co.uk

(in reply to calamitysandra)
Profile   Post #: 112
RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? - 7/14/2010 3:28:55 PM   
angelikaJ


Posts: 8641
Joined: 6/22/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

quote:

ORIGINAL: angelikaJ

You left out what to me was the most important part of LaT's quote:
"I don't see neglecting their mental well being via education as any less a crime than neglecting their nutritional health."

And you are right most parents don't molest their children... but some do.

So, a hypothetical parent who does molest can simply opt out of the lesson plan and you are ok with that? Because we are not just talking about your future children to be, we are also talking about that child... and the child whose parents never discuss sex because their child is too innocent for such things, only the neighbor down the street has already taken away that child's innocence.

I do understand where you are coming from, but your need for an individual choice does keep other children at risk of harm.



Not to mention, the neighbours kids might then take away your child's innocence because they didn't know that what was done to them was inappropriate therefor, when playing in the playhouse, did it to your, unaware child.



That is also true.



_____________________________

The original home of the caffeinated psychotic hair pixies.
(as deemed by He who owns me)

http://www.collarchat.com/m_3234821/tm.htm

30 fluffy points!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQjuCQd01sg

(in reply to LaTigresse)
Profile   Post #: 113
RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? - 7/14/2010 3:32:06 PM   
CynthiaWVirginia


Posts: 1915
Joined: 2/28/2010
From: West Virginia, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

59,

you really have to consider how functional a 5 year old is. That is when you learn to count- ABCs, say please, take your turn, share

Sorry, pahunkboy, I needed to use your quote to kick off my point and stay focused on only this one micro issue and not type in a novel here.  I still might end up going for the epic post.  This isn't targeted at you, okay?
quote:

From Owner59:
Is a parent`s want to maintain a fantasy about childhood innocents worth keeping them ignorant to the dangers?

This is part of what's wrong with the world, selfdelusion.  If anyone for one blessed moment THINKS that a kindergartener knowing the words penis or vagina can prevent molestation...I have a bridge I wanna sell you in Brooklyn.  I spent YEARS in therapy, and besides encouraging me to talk about it until I was sick and tired of hearing myself talk about it...the best thing a shrink did for me was to make me study kids in elementary school and notice something.  That young kids cannot face off with a predator and win, unless the predator is supremely incompetent.  I had to forgive myself for not being fast enough, smart enough, etc. because somehow it was my responsibility at 5, then 6, then 7, etc. to know the signs and get the heck out in time.
 
Who taught me that this was MY responsibility?  SCHOOLS and the media, carping about "if someone touches you in your swimsuit zone" what to do about it. 
 
By the time someone does that, it's already fricking too late. 
 
Everyone who thinks it's wise for kindergarteners to take responsibility for preventing pedophile attacks can bite me.  Yes, I am very hostile about this retarded shiite people spew out.  Let the kids fingerpaint and use crayons and sing about Puff the Magic Dragon, for crying out loud, and stop trying to put responsibility on them that has no business being there.  The responsibility belongs to adults, not 5 year olds. 
 
Keep DNA caught, or caught red handed pedophiles in jail until they are dead...that's how to prevent them from amassing more victims.  These guys go through hundreds of kids in their lifetimes.  They're good at it, without conscience, and like a good predator, hang out where the kiddies are.
 
My ex-husband's people protect their daughters (and I've seen to it that he is also paranoid about protecting his infant son).  Outsiders do not watch their kids, the wife and he work on different shifts and one of them is at home at all times to watch the children.  When they are outside playing, they are watched by parents.  Yes, I told my ex about all my old babysitters in the past.  How they brought boyfriends over and kicked us outside, unsupervised, almost the entire time my mom was at work.  My father would have us outside all day long on the playground too, unsupervised, for sometimes over 6 hours.  We ran all over the neighborhood from the time I was 6 and the pedophiles almost fell to their knees in gratitude to have another available vulnerable child who knew how to blame herself properly and be ashamed. 
 
(Sarcasm font) <gives standing ovation to all those lovely programs that taught children how to deal with pedophiles and take appropriate action>
 
Without another adult witness, without it being caught on video tape, without very incriminating genetic evidence left behind in damning places...not much can ever be done after the fact.  Young children break in court rooms, break during doctor's exams (at 6 I had to answer all adult female questions like birth control use, frequency of sex, how many partners, etc.  I felt like trash, disposable and RUINED, DISGRACED, WORTHLESS, and a complete WHORE, need I go on?).  All this other stuff is often equally or more traumatic for the kid.  This is from the horse's mouth, people. 
 
I'm going to approach this from a different angle now:
quote:

Is a parent`s want to maintain a fantasy about childhood innocents worth keeping them ignorant to the dangers?

Let's answer that from both a parental standpoint and also substitute the word society.  "Is it society's want to maintain a fantasy about childhood innocence worth keeping them ignorant to the dangers?"  Innocence???  With all the stuff that's on our tvs?  You're kidding me, right?  Kids are in the room with mom and dad while they're watching R rated movies...gay stuff on tv is common and crops up everywhere in movies and tv shows...they are already getting their proper American, pardon the pun, programming of brain cells from all the media.  Often...just watching commercials will teach more than what they plan to teach kids in school about sex ed and learning tolerance, it's inexcapable.  Naming body parts used to be left to health class, and somehow knowing the name is entirely different from the reality I went though in first grade...I didn't have to see words, I saw pictures.  Some pedophile had cut pix from some man/child magazine and had managed to scatter the pix all over the playground.  I took some home with me because...I saw that I wasn't the only girl in the world who had done that.  Protecting innocents?  Protecting innocence?  Why wasn't there people watching the playground as we left?  Why had I been one of many to see these pix but no adult noticed and confiscated them?  WTF???
 
Why are parents and society not teaching tween boys that there are things that they better not do with 6 and 7 year old girls?  That if there is no equal power among children, there is no consent.  A 14 year old cannot have a 7 year old girlfriend.  While older kids are let loose to run wild, unsupervised all over the neighborhood, cuz they're safely old enough to protect themselves, guess what some are doing?
 
Childhood innocence only exists when there are adults around on guard duty teaching older ones the rules of behavior, and watching out for those too young to do anything to protect themselves.  Innocence exists when decent adults do their job, and not expect a 5 year old to pick up that dropped ball.
 
Another issue.  If someone thinks that teaching kindergarteners or even elementary kids about gay tolerance will will magically transform all kids into tolerant beings, think again.  We've already done the race thing in schools...but yanno, when my son was even in kindergarten, first grade, second grade, and third (before I yanked him for homeschool)...kids turned down birthday party invitations at McDonalds with presents given out for first through whatever place in birthday games like Pin the Tail on the Donkey...because as some said, their parents didn't let them go to birthday parties of "n*****s".  (My son is mixed.)  Later the kids were more discreet and merely said no thank you.  This education in school that was so important was not some magic bullet with races, and it is also NOT going to erase people's possible religious beliefs over accepting gays.  As far as religious beliefs and prejudices are concerned, as long as they're not insulting and don't act out hatefully on their beliefs...I stay out of it because it's their cross to bear not mine.  I think our media has a greater effect on slowly changing society than this failed theory of teaching about it in elementary school.  If education is so educational, how come girls graduate high school thinking that babies come out their pee holes?  Around here, some graduate without being able to do math or even to read properly. 
 
When I took my kid out of school, the town almost fell on my head calling me abusive for taking my kid away from all those peer group "friends" he absolutely must have.  I even had people argue with me that school work and learning wasn't as important as being in a properly age segregated setting, that school was necessary to be "socialized."  What a crock that was.  The ones who went through the public school system and had all that sex education still had unprotected sex...and got genital warts and all kinds of ugly STDs, as well as babies.  The racist ones still are racist. 
 
If someone thinks that school talks can change how the families of kindergarteners feel about gays and transgenders, etc., yeah right.  There's a time and a place for everything, and this isn't the time nor place. 
 
If someone wants to change the world...get subtle and make movies or write entertaining books and use that medium to make people feel the issue personally.  I bet almost everyone who watched the television series Buffy the Vampire Slayer and watched the love story between Willow and Tara would completely understand and have a very hard time calling it a sin when hets were merely boinking and they were in a committed loving relationship (that song they did on that episode, "Once More, With Feeling", called Under Your Spell gave me chills.  :)
 
By the time my father started up his racial hate training when I was in 5th grade, it was too late to hear anything he had to say...I already adored Bill Cosby because of watching Fat Albert cartoons and the Jello Pudding commercials.  I saw clearly that my father had issues that were not my own and could never poison my life.
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
About the first part of my posts...I'm sorry to have ranted but I tried not to attack anybody, just spell out clearly the points I was trying to make as to why I DETEST this idea.  I have very strong feelings on this subject and rarely try to educate others as doing so gets me very upset for weeks afterward. 

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 114
RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? - 7/14/2010 3:33:16 PM   
Vendaval


Posts: 10297
Joined: 1/15/2005
Status: offline
Unfortunately yes.

_____________________________

"Beware, the woods at night, beware the lunar light.
So in this gray haze we'll be meating again, and on that
great day, I will tease you all the same."
"WOLF MOON", OCTOBER RUST, TYPE O NEGATIVE


http://KinkMeet.co.uk

(in reply to angelikaJ)
Profile   Post #: 115
RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? - 7/14/2010 3:45:18 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

Everyone who thinks it's wise for kindergarteners to take responsibility for preventing pedophile attacks can bite me.


No one said they were to take responsibility, i said they were to be empowered.

No one said a child would win against a pedophile. An honest, open relationship between an adult and child gives the child a sense of self-worth, and its to that adult the child will turn too when the abuse begins.

Its about teaching the appropriate terms for organs so that if/when abuse begins, the child can speak of such terms and not feel the embarrassment you speak of.

Predators bank on the taboo subject of sex... take the taboo out and they have less to rely upon.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to CynthiaWVirginia)
Profile   Post #: 116
RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? - 7/14/2010 3:49:05 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline
If this thread that has already gone on too long is about Montana, parents can opt out. That isnt the real issue imo. We produced far better students when the curriculum was the 3 Rs, history, science and language. all of the rest is a collossal waste of time and resources.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 117
RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? - 7/14/2010 3:51:40 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
Its already past that point, willbe.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 118
RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? - 7/14/2010 3:56:00 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Its already past that point, willbe.


The thread or our education system? (or both!)

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 119
RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? - 7/14/2010 3:56:24 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
willbur would like to refight the whole "scopes-monkey" trial thing.....lol.

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Obama supports sex ed for kindergartners........wtf? Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109