Kana -> RE: Who punishes the dominant? (7/15/2010 5:21:02 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MagiksSlave quote:
ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW quote:
ORIGINAL: MagiksSlave quote:
ORIGINAL: Kana "Who punishes the dominant?" IDK about anyone else, but I have this pesky little thing called a conscience... And subs don't?? This is a "logic-wreck"... there was -never- any implication that individuals who yield authority do not have a conscience. However, those who choose to participate in relationships where punishment is part of the dynamic DO yield the "right of correction" to the individual to whom they yield authority.... so whether or not they have a conscience, they will still be required to answer to that authority. That being said, for most individuals who HOLD the authority, they are the sole "disciplinarian" for themselves, and THAT is the point Kana was making when he answered the OP by declaring that -his own conscience- was the "disciplinary factor" for his mistakes. Implying that stating such (which is accurate) is somehow a slam against submissive individuals and that it implies that he believes that submissive individuals don't have a conscience is a straw man argument and has no place in reasonable debate on the subject. Calla What I am getting at is, if having a conscience is good enough for the Dom, why isnt it for the sub, why does the sub have to be subjected to punishment other than that? It's my own thing, I know people like it, I just dont find it necessery. Hey. No one ever said slavery was fair. I'm gonna use the word consequences cuz I'm not so fond of punishment. Consequences may or may not be needed, but it's the way our dynamic works. It's the way I want it, it's how she wants it (Uhhhh-that's part of why she chose to surrender to me). She likes, wants, needs, craves to be held accountable, I like to hold people accountable (and I do this in pretty much all areas of my life-ask her-I can be an SOB when I wanna). She likes the structure, the discipline. I like control. Hence I would say that while we engage in BDSM, what our relationship is centered around is an extreme D/S dynamic with all the other activities being branches that stem from that main trunk. Now, a few side thoughts. I don't quite understand what the whole fucking focus is on punishment around here. If I have had a slave for an extended period of time and she's not behaving, it means either she is approaching things from a bad head space or attitude, which usually results in adios, or I am doing something wrong. Consequences aren't fun, for me or for her. I don't like to have to give em, and she most certainly doesn't like to get em and in sooth, I rarely have to resort to such measures. Why? Because she's a terrific slave. Finding fault with her performance is like finding flaws in Michelangelo's Pieta. And that's saying something because I am a persnickety bitch. In five years, I bet she's gotten less than fifty strokes as a consequence. I'd like to puff my chest out and say I had a whole lot to do with that (and I did in that I chose well but that's about it) but that would be so much BS. She's a great slave, in many ways less because of what she does, in and out of shackles, but more because of the attitude she has and her mentality. She likes to serve and frankly, most slaves I've met hate punishment. There is not a damn thing they like about it. It's awful, miserable and a horrendous experience. Not because of the physical consequences, but because of the emotive and internal costs and anyone who thinks otherwise is deluded.
|
|
|
|