cassandria
Posts: 86
Joined: 6/6/2010 Status: offline
|
My father passed away many years ago, so there's no sharing of this name in present day, nor do I have any "father issues" to be worked out by using this type of medium. There are some men that I naturally feel more of a playfullness with, that I sense a benovelency given, that I willingly allow the child within to come forth...and she does, quite cheerfully and impishly There's nothing incestuous about it, at least not to me - and I'm pretty sure not to them either - certainly sex was involved as well, and I had to grin at whomever said something about having her ass raped while calling him "Daddy" - the pleading, the closeness, the forbiddenness of the act and the words used...yeah, that's hot. So maybe somewhere in there it may enter in...but I think it's more of an authoritative relationship, where I'm usually years younger, he's older, and the title fits because of the closeness...but it's very different from the kind of relationship I had with my father as a child. Different man, same title, different dynamic, both in authority, but one sexual, one not, one I'm an adult with (technically), consenting freely and openly.. one I was always his child. The word "Daddy" doesn't apply to every dominant, to every dynamic...not even close. But when I feel it...I'll cautiously use it...and see what the reaction is. I can usually read by my own responses whether it'll be appreciated...encouraged...or frowned upon. If I'm unsure, I won't go there. And I'm perfectly happy either way...it's not a "must have" for me. What I must have is a controlling man in my life. Some relationships are more strict, less 'available' and just don't lend themselves to the Daddy/babygirl dynamic. I have a deep appreciation for both.
< Message edited by cassandria -- 7/22/2010 1:51:42 PM >
|