dbloomer -> RE: The Anti-Feminism Bias (7/29/2010 10:13:54 AM)
|
quote:
Out of curiosity - Which roles are "better suited for men" and which are "better suited for women"? And when you say "better suited" what do you mean exactly - do you mean, for example, that women shouldn't be allowed to perform those roles that are "better suited for men", or that when recruiting for these roles organisations should simply be allowed to disregard applications from women? I don't believe imposing limitations on anyone, at any time, for any reason. You can read through my posts and see that I say in no uncertain terms that I'm for equal rights for men and women. I've provided examples in my previous posts on jobs that are better suited for men. The point of all this isn't that "Men should have a set regimen of tasks, women should have THEIR set regimen of tasks, and that men and women should do what nature designed them to do and nothing else." The point, which is really very simple and supported by actual research which I've read, is that men are biologically geared to do certain things better, and women are biologically geared to do certain things better. Yes, we live in a day and age where ANYONE can fullfill almost ANY role, man or woman. However, your mind and body is still a machine built for a different era and a different reality. Don't let feminism, or any other belief structure, tell you that you need to be contrary to nature's design for you. If you're a 200 pound muscle-bound woman and feel strong and confident, fine, go ahead and assume masculine responsibilities, I have no problem with that. If you're a 90 pound girl looking for a strong guy to take care of you and love you, don't let feminism say you're wrong in doing so in it's misguided notion that men and women are identical and equal in every facet.
|
|
|
|