Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Communism and Socialism.. the devil?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Communism and Socialism.. the devil? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Communism and Socialism.. the devil? - 7/30/2010 5:55:53 PM   
domiguy


Posts: 12952
Joined: 5/2/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: StrangerThan

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

RML, that's not even a non sequitur. It's just nothin, dude.


Seemed pretty clear to me.

Cheap food is higher in fat content and calories.

But do let me know if that still confuses you.







Cheap processed food is higher in fat and calories.

Locally grown vegetables during summer months are some of the most inexpensive foods you can buy and are fairly easy to store long term. If you're not into canning, some you can just toss in the freezer - like corn. Just bag it, husk, silk and all. Microwave 4-5 minutes when you take it out. Tastes like it just came from the garden.

Doesn't take 40 acres and a mule to make a difference either. I planted tomatoes along my fence line, cabbage and pepper are scattered through some of the flowerbeds, cucumbers and strawberries occupy another fence line planting that's smaller than most of the flowerbeds. Corn is running around 4-5 ears /dollar right now. Planted dwarf versions of pears and peaches. Already have an apple tree in the back yard. Two types of grape vines on the side.

Even if you don't grow it yourself, visits to the local farmers and a few days work during summer months can provide enough food to last most of the winter.

To the OP, if the ideal is unattainable, and if every form tried has ended as a bastardization, seems like being a communist is akin to living in fantasy land, maybe on a plot right next to Huxley.




You have no idea what you are talking about. More and more people are livingin large cities then ever before.

These people do not have the ability to plant a garden or get to the farm.

Have you ever been to a local fasrmers market that is held within ther confines of a major metropolitan area.....

Chicago has farmer's markets. They are a total rip off. Way over priced and I have my reservations as to what exactly constitutes a "Local farm." Seemed like a lot of crappy produce was being passed off as being provided and grown locally.

_____________________________



(in reply to StrangerThan)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Communism and Socialism.. the devil? - 7/30/2010 6:51:29 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: wittynamehere

Agreed with the above. I put in some decent work out back of my place, and still only get a few boxes of potatoes, tomatoes, and various herbs etc per year. It's not as easy as just going to a place with dirt, scattering some seeds, picking out weeds once about halfway through the season, and coming back several months later to pick up your boxes of groceries.

And even those who do it for years, and do it well, still have to trade for and buy other stuff. Try eating nothing but plain beans, or maybe a salad made of nothing but lettuce and tomatoes, and you'll realize just how much variety you eat (and require for nutrition) every day.



I suspect StrangerThan does not grow his garden in downtown Detroit or Newark. He might have a different pov if he tried.

_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to wittynamehere)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Communism and Socialism.. the devil? - 7/30/2010 7:09:41 PM   
AnimusRex


Posts: 2165
Joined: 5/13/2006
Status: offline
I don't hate either socialism or communism. I just regard socialism, and its mirror image libertarianism, as being artificial constructs based on an absurdly hypothetical premise.

The OP is correct, in that pure socialism (and libertarianism) has never been tried; which for me is one clue why it is so weak. The socialist/ libertarian utopias exist only in the fevered imaginations of people unwilling to recognize the diversity and complexity of the world.

Both are based on faith and dogma instead of reason and evidence.

(in reply to E3)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Communism and Socialism.. the devil? - 7/30/2010 7:15:44 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BitaTruble

FR

Freedom has been tasted and it is addictive. We are much to complex as a species to be molded into tiny shapes so as to fit into the boxes of pure communism and socialism. The Sun revolves around the Earth. The Earth is flat. People have less value because of the amount of melanin in their epidermis or because they love in an unconvential manner.

No. It's just not so.

Society has been too wrong for too long. Society has produced nothing, invented nothing, bred nothing. We have no books, art or music because of society. Society has cured no ills, nor cooked a meal, nor fed the masses. People do those things. Individuals and sometimes groups of individuals. Not society.

Society is undeserving of such a vast and complex leadership role. We need high standards, with high bars and rewards for excellence commensurate with ability and results.. not with need. Society just isn't good enough.

The guy with 10 children will consume far greater resources than the single guy with no children. They are not equal in need, but may be equal in ability.. and should be rewarded for the ability and what they do with it, not for the need. The ramifications are too significant, the cost to benefit ratio too high because it does come at the price of freedom and that's a price that should not be paid to benefit the nameless, faceless society that would set it aside for another blanket or cord of wood. I don't believe there are many things that are worth killing or dieing for, but I do believe that freedom is one of those things and I have instilled that into my children and pray that philosophy will remain in the bloodline of my family for untold generations.




Bita, your post is well written and well reasoned. However, the historical fallacy is that at no time has Capitalism extended "freedom" to everyone. There have always been slaves, indentured slaves, wage slaves and the unemployed. The fruits of Capitalism are not shared according to ability except in the ideal fantasy. There have always been successfully wealthy nonproducers, monopolists, and oligarchies as well as government subsidies and special advantages granted to Capital. Left to its own unfettered devices Capital has shown it will run amuck over Labor. Labor is just another capital investment and so will be short changed whenever possible. In the labor/management struggles that turned violent in the late 19th Century police were always marshalled to protect property not people.

Consider the contemporary world of haves and have-nots. The wealth accumulation is way to the favor of the Corporate Class who greedily clamor for more, more, more. We live in a world of economic injustice because Capital has pockets deep enough to buy off Govt. Those who bitch and moan about excessive regulation are grinning on the other side of their faces because they know full well their campaign contributions to both major parties will bear fruit for them.

What freedoms do the poor have? Security, health care, shelter, opportunity? Hardly. I am not advocating socialism. I don't know what socialism truly is. But surely it is not too much to ask for social justice for everyone who are living their one and only lives. Capitalism as we know it does not provide for human decency let alone freedom for all. The evidence speaks for itself.

< Message edited by vincentML -- 7/30/2010 7:17:53 PM >


_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to BitaTruble)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Communism and Socialism.. the devil? - 7/31/2010 12:21:53 AM   
NorthernGent


Posts: 8730
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: E3

Yep another case of mis-implimented Communism. 




Assuming you place value on what people do rather than what they say.......then there is no such thing as 'mis-implimented Communism'.

Left wing revolutionaries don't set out to become tyrants.....they really believe they are setting their countries on the road to liberty and the democratisation of power.

Problem being that they trick themselves into believing they are above the love of power that seems to be much sought after among human beings. Once in power....opposition groups surface (inevitably)....and they use coercion and violence to maintain power and order...all the time believing that coercion and violence is justified because they're setting their countries on the road to liberty....which of course is utterly deluded.

So....you have Lenin and Trotsky. Didn't start out as tyrants...genuinely believed they were setting Russia on a path away from absolutism and vested interests controlling government. As they believed they had the one true way to salvation though.....they soon began to smash anything that got in their way.....including Trotsky himself who ended up with an axe through his head.......but the pair of them were soon dictating to comrades: "there is no discipline without the use of a revolver"....."and waverers must be crushed"......(probably not quite the exact quotes - but the same point nevertheless).

Not the devil no.....and a nice idea with which I have a certain amount of sympathy.......but you can't force people to be free......you can't expect people who really don't care about grand political principles.....who just want a decent income to enjoy their version of life......to follow a group of intellectuals (always at the forefront of revolutions) and their grand designs......there's a disconnect there...which is why the well intentioned intellectuals resort to violence and coercion once in power.....they have to in order to maintain it.



_____________________________

I have the courage to be a coward - but not beyond my limits.

Sooner or later, the man who wins is the man who thinks he can.

(in reply to E3)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Communism and Socialism.. the devil? - 7/31/2010 3:28:17 AM   
BitaTruble


Posts: 9779
Joined: 1/12/2006
From: Texas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML



Bita, your post is well written and well reasoned. However, the historical fallacy is that at no time has Capitalism extended "freedom" to everyone. There have always been slaves, indentured slaves, wage slaves and the unemployed. The fruits of Capitalism are not shared according to ability except in the ideal fantasy. There have always been successfully wealthy nonproducers, monopolists, and oligarchies as well as government subsidies and special advantages granted to Capital. Left to its own unfettered devices Capital has shown it will run amuck over Labor. Labor is just another capital investment and so will be short changed whenever possible. In the labor/management struggles that turned violent in the late 19th Century police were always marshalled to protect property not people.

Consider the contemporary world of haves and have-nots. The wealth accumulation is way to the favor of the Corporate Class who greedily clamor for more, more, more. We live in a world of economic injustice because Capital has pockets deep enough to buy off Govt. Those who bitch and moan about excessive regulation are grinning on the other side of their faces because they know full well their campaign contributions to both major parties will bear fruit for them.

What freedoms do the poor have? Security, health care, shelter, opportunity? Hardly. I am not advocating socialism. I don't know what socialism truly is. But surely it is not too much to ask for social justice for everyone who are living their one and only lives. Capitalism as we know it does not provide for human decency let alone freedom for all. The evidence speaks for itself.


Thank you for the compliment, Vincent, but my post didn't address capitalism. This topic is about communism and socialism, so I'm not sure what, exactly, your post has to do with mine? Personally, I believe that balance is the answer and that we, as a people and as the complex species which we are, need to figure out exactly where the most favorable balance lies without stifiling individuality, motivation and creativity and, hey, if I had the answer to that question, I'd run for President myself. :)

< Message edited by BitaTruble -- 7/31/2010 3:29:46 AM >


_____________________________

"Oh, so it's just like
Rock, paper, scissors."

He laughed. "You are the wisest woman I know."


(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Communism and Socialism.. the devil? - 7/31/2010 4:04:36 AM   
StrangerThan


Posts: 1515
Joined: 4/25/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

Even if you don't grow it yourself, visits to the local farmers and a few days work during summer months can provide enough food to last most of the winter.


You do not seem to know much about farming.
I have been a subsistance farmer for the past 25 years and I still spend about $600 dollars a year in the grocery store. I do not grow chocolate, coffee or wheat. Consequently I need to purchase bread,coffee and chocolate(life without chocolate is barely existence) as well as salt and other spices.
It would be more than a bit presumptious to claim that 10,000 square feet of garden qualifies as a farm but it takes somewhat more than a few days a year to make it produce what I need.



I never said you could grow everything you eat, but if you're only spending 600 a year, you're making my point for me. And even if you don't grow it, this time of year you can put back enough to last a good portion of the winter by buying it at local farms and farmers markets. Go to the grocery store and spend $3 or so for 5 pounds of potatoes. You can buy a 50 pound bag for less than $10 if you spend a little time looking. Tomatoes go by the bushel. Corn as well. No, you won't find everything but you can cut your food bills by a rather large percentage with a few days work simply by buying it this time of year in the right places and preserving it.

Again, not everything, but a good portion.

$600 a year? Do you realize that the food bill for a family of 4 can easily top $1000 a month?


_____________________________


--'Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to reform' - Mark Twain

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Communism and Socialism.. the devil? - 7/31/2010 4:17:08 AM   
StrangerThan


Posts: 1515
Joined: 4/25/2008
Status: offline
Maria, maria, who named her sons Carl John and John Carl - I shit you not - was a sweet little lady from Brooklyn who lived next door to me in Boston. I grew up on a farm so I never even considered the tiny little back yards at the rental houses for growing food. She planted maybe an 8x8 square plot of summer vegetables, tomatoes, peppers, cucumbers, squash, basil I don't know what else. That little plot looked like a rain forest and bore enough so that she bought none of those during the summer months.

Agreed, many farmer's markets are anything but local. Food is shipped in from everywhere. It's little more than going to a grocery store with a bit of farm decor. But I've lived in Boston, LA, San Diego, Jacksonville, and Houston. I'll grant you it's easier to find vegetables where I live now at cheap prices than it was in those places, but they could still be found. Hell, weekends were often spent going outside the city for one thing or another, beach, mountains, something. We just picked it up along the way.

Buy in bulk, and preserve it. Corn has to be the easiest thing in the world to store. Just bag the crap and throw it in a freezer.


_____________________________


--'Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to reform' - Mark Twain

(in reply to domiguy)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Communism and Socialism.. the devil? - 7/31/2010 4:42:04 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: StrangerThan

Maria, maria, who named her sons Carl John and John Carl - I shit you not - was a sweet little lady from Brooklyn who lived next door to me in Boston. I grew up on a farm so I never even considered the tiny little back yards at the rental houses for growing food. She planted maybe an 8x8 square plot of summer vegetables, tomatoes, peppers, cucumbers, squash, basil I don't know what else. That little plot looked like a rain forest and bore enough so that she bought none of those during the summer months.

Agreed, many farmer's markets are anything but local. Food is shipped in from everywhere. It's little more than going to a grocery store with a bit of farm decor. But I've lived in Boston, LA, San Diego, Jacksonville, and Houston. I'll grant you it's easier to find vegetables where I live now at cheap prices than it was in those places, but they could still be found. Hell, weekends were often spent going outside the city for one thing or another, beach, mountains, something. We just picked it up along the way.

Buy in bulk, and preserve it. Corn has to be the easiest thing in the world to store. Just bag the crap and throw it in a freezer.




Yes, corn is easy to freeze and delicious to eat. Unfortunately it doesn't have much nutrition to it. Same with potatoes. I would imagine there are ways to preserve other veggies, like broccoli and carrots but do you seriously want to go back to living like that? And do you honestly think there is that much produce available in say the Detroit area to feed everyone in the city for the winter? And if you come up with the food, who is going to pay to supply everyone with the equipment to properly save the food? My sister moved to a farm a couple of years ago and is getting into preserving now. That stuff is not cheap. Then you have to train everyone how to use it, so they don't screw up and poison themselves.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to StrangerThan)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Communism and Socialism.. the devil? - 7/31/2010 4:59:56 AM   
StrangerThan


Posts: 1515
Joined: 4/25/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: StrangerThan

Maria, maria, who named her sons Carl John and John Carl - I shit you not - was a sweet little lady from Brooklyn who lived next door to me in Boston. I grew up on a farm so I never even considered the tiny little back yards at the rental houses for growing food. She planted maybe an 8x8 square plot of summer vegetables, tomatoes, peppers, cucumbers, squash, basil I don't know what else. That little plot looked like a rain forest and bore enough so that she bought none of those during the summer months.

Agreed, many farmer's markets are anything but local. Food is shipped in from everywhere. It's little more than going to a grocery store with a bit of farm decor. But I've lived in Boston, LA, San Diego, Jacksonville, and Houston. I'll grant you it's easier to find vegetables where I live now at cheap prices than it was in those places, but they could still be found. Hell, weekends were often spent going outside the city for one thing or another, beach, mountains, something. We just picked it up along the way.

Buy in bulk, and preserve it. Corn has to be the easiest thing in the world to store. Just bag the crap and throw it in a freezer.




Yes, corn is easy to freeze and delicious to eat. Unfortunately it doesn't have much nutrition to it. Same with potatoes. I would imagine there are ways to preserve other veggies, like broccoli and carrots but do you seriously want to go back to living like that? And do you honestly think there is that much produce available in say the Detroit area to feed everyone in the city for the winter? And if you come up with the food, who is going to pay to supply everyone with the equipment to properly save the food? My sister moved to a farm a couple of years ago and is getting into preserving now. That stuff is not cheap. Then you have to train everyone how to use it, so they don't screw up and poison themselves.


Honestly, I could give a shit less about the population of Detroit or those who complain that cheap food is full of fat and calories - which is where this started. It's full of fat and calories if you choose to eat it. What it boils down to is choices and who or what you're going to be beholden to. Most folks are too lazy to do much more than go to the grocer and complain about the prices. Fine. Got no problem with them or the choice they made. All I am saying is there are other options if you choose to pursue them.

The oddity of the entire discussion is that in many communist countries, people have historically had little to no choice except to stand in bread lines. A few years ago I lived in an area with a fairly large population of Russian immigrants. Know what? From that former communist state, every damned one of them grew gardens and put up food for the winter.

Shrug. As far as living like that, I grew up that way. There is a distinct part of me that enjoys it to a degree. I never want to go back to hoeing rows of potatoes and corn so long you can't see the ends of them, but hell, I don't have one problem in the world with stopping by farms that are selling their produce on the side of the road, buying a shitload of it and sticking it in a freezer or a jar.


_____________________________


--'Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to reform' - Mark Twain

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Communism and Socialism.. the devil? - 7/31/2010 5:53:07 AM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline
The whole post is rendered incorrect by it's supposition.

Kinkroids it is the OTHER way around. Socialism is a system of govt. and Communism IS an economic system.

Socialism is simply...SIMPLY, the govt. ownership of the means of production. This doesn't mean TOTAL ownership but controlling ownership. Meaning that there can still be stock corp. and a public market for 49% of the stock. It doesn't mean ALL of the means of production, only those segments that the voting public would allow the govt. to take over and could even be similar to what we did at GM & Chrysler except we (govt.) would have owned a majority of its only remaining stock...NOT only in loans.

Communism is a collective economic system.. Where govt. plans and owns ALL of everything. Then govt. decides (plans) production levels and compensation levels. There is NO private ownership in a communist system

To effect these changes communist govt. must install fascism or a police controlled state which is the basis of all failure in communism.

Communism HAS been tried and is unsuccessful for the above reasons.

However...Socialism has never been truly implemented and all what one hears or reads about it has been capitalist propaganda.

What HAS NOT been tried is a truly free market. If we had, 1/2 of wall street and a number of greedy investors around the world...would have failed. GM & Chrylser would have likely been liquidated in Chapter 7. But capitalists have such power over govt. they can be socialists to bail them out and continue their avarice in that HE...he not you...can become to big to fail and be entitled to bonuses for being so big, greedy and very successful.

What hasn't been truly implemented anywhere in the world...is a truly free market with avarice regulating law...certainly not the regime we've tried.

Try this one for size...and reason. European middle ages (dark ages) survival was almost entirely through a form of communism. It was villages living collectively to survive because it was absolutely necessary.

I've tried to give these forums perspective in that China calls itself communist but in name only to practice fascism to control their economy BUT in actuality...China is the new role model...capitalist fascism. That has been tried, without equivocation in Italy under Mussolini and in Nazi Germany when in fact nationalist socialism was a means to take power. Once there the Naxis were among the most thieving capitalists the world had ever created.

(in reply to StrangerThan)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Communism and Socialism.. the devil? - 7/31/2010 6:54:12 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

Try this one for size...and reason. European middle ages (dark ages) survival was almost entirely through a form of communism. It was villages living collectively to survive because it was absolutely necessary.


Excellent post, MR. The only quibble I would have is that Medieval villages were usually huddled around the Manor House and paid a share of grain and livestock for protection to the Lord of the Manor.... sort of an early Godfather arrangement.

Definately an excellent post. Kudos.

_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Communism and Socialism.. the devil? - 7/31/2010 6:57:46 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

Honestly, I could give a shit less about the population of Detroit or those who complain that cheap food is full of fat and calories - which is where this started. It's full of fat and calories if you choose to eat it. What it boils down to is choices and who or what you're going to be beholden to. Most folks are too lazy to do much more than go to the grocer and complain about the prices. Fine. Got no problem with them or the choice they made. All I am saying is there are other options if you choose to pursue them.


Too easily dismissed, ST. The issue is that inner cities lack grocery stores and nutritional food choices and the means of transportation to go out to the countryside for a day of shopping the farms.

< Message edited by vincentML -- 7/31/2010 7:00:14 AM >


_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to StrangerThan)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Communism and Socialism.. the devil? - 7/31/2010 7:06:05 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BitaTruble

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML



Bita, your post is well written and well reasoned. However, the historical fallacy is that at no time has Capitalism extended "freedom" to everyone. There have always been slaves, indentured slaves, wage slaves and the unemployed. The fruits of Capitalism are not shared according to ability except in the ideal fantasy. There have always been successfully wealthy nonproducers, monopolists, and oligarchies as well as government subsidies and special advantages granted to Capital. Left to its own unfettered devices Capital has shown it will run amuck over Labor. Labor is just another capital investment and so will be short changed whenever possible. In the labor/management struggles that turned violent in the late 19th Century police were always marshalled to protect property not people.

Consider the contemporary world of haves and have-nots. The wealth accumulation is way to the favor of the Corporate Class who greedily clamor for more, more, more. We live in a world of economic injustice because Capital has pockets deep enough to buy off Govt. Those who bitch and moan about excessive regulation are grinning on the other side of their faces because they know full well their campaign contributions to both major parties will bear fruit for them.

What freedoms do the poor have? Security, health care, shelter, opportunity? Hardly. I am not advocating socialism. I don't know what socialism truly is. But surely it is not too much to ask for social justice for everyone who are living their one and only lives. Capitalism as we know it does not provide for human decency let alone freedom for all. The evidence speaks for itself.


Thank you for the compliment, Vincent, but my post didn't address capitalism. This topic is about communism and socialism, so I'm not sure what, exactly, your post has to do with mine? Personally, I believe that balance is the answer and that we, as a people and as the complex species which we are, need to figure out exactly where the most favorable balance lies without stifiling individuality, motivation and creativity and, hey, if I had the answer to that question, I'd run for President myself. :)


Bita, you wrote that men should be rewarded for their abilities and not their needs and then you praised "freedom." I connected the dots between the two to capitalism since that is the usual message I hear in praise of Capitalism.

Apologies for misreading you.

_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to BitaTruble)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Communism and Socialism.. the devil? - 7/31/2010 7:55:01 AM   
StrangerThan


Posts: 1515
Joined: 4/25/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

Honestly, I could give a shit less about the population of Detroit or those who complain that cheap food is full of fat and calories - which is where this started. It's full of fat and calories if you choose to eat it. What it boils down to is choices and who or what you're going to be beholden to. Most folks are too lazy to do much more than go to the grocer and complain about the prices. Fine. Got no problem with them or the choice they made. All I am saying is there are other options if you choose to pursue them.


Too easily dismissed, ST. The issue is that inner cities lack grocery stores and nutritional food choices and the means of transportation to go out to the countryside for a day of shopping the farms.


The larger issue in the communist/capitalist debate is that we're not switching forms any time in the foreseeable future. If you want something easily dismissed, it's more the thought that someone else must provide it for me. It's the listless, I have no choice but to eat shitty foods, end up obese,  and spend my time explaining why that's someone elses fault concept that gets the eye roll. Get off your ass and do something if you want it to change. If that's not good enough, then sit around and whine and complain. Neither really makes a difference to me.

I know what big cities are like. I've lived in half a dozen of them. Nor am I positing anything for the benefit of society. I'm saying, you have choices. Choose what you will, but understand in the greater scheme of things the idea of ultimate responsibility. Eating at taco bell and McDonald's most of your life because someone didn't plop a farmers co-opt on your city block is, for many people, a choice.

And as I write this, my girl says, will you get some pop-tarts when you go out?

lol




_____________________________


--'Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to reform' - Mark Twain

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Communism and Socialism.. the devil? - 7/31/2010 8:14:56 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
Hello E3,

As you may have no doubt met, the 'left' and 'right' folks here on the forum. Your original post is curious to read through. As you may have suspected everyone, or mostly everyone, has injected their version of 'reality' on the concepts known as 'Communisim' and 'Socialism'. As expected, the conservatives take the most negative view point, without ever really explaining that Capitalism (the opposing concept of these two, according to them), is much better with arguements. The liberals seem to ponder the concept, and engage with either history, a modern 'philosophy' or a personal free thought.

The two goverment styles have never really been tried before. And you are correct. However, nor as The Republic, Democracy, Capitalism, Totalitarianism, or dare I even say, Despotism(sp?). Yes, if one looks back in history, at the defination of each of these words as a concept, one will fine, no goverment really display the concept in a pure method. While the USA people define the goverment in one of many versions:

A) A Democratic Republic - In that the citizenry of the country, vote people whom will represent them towards other member states, in one union. We commonly elect a president, but not a vice president. We elect two senators for each state, and a number of representatives based on population. And these people, handle the day-to-day affairs of our country.

B) A Republic - Similair to 'A', except removing the basic individual from the equation, as they are not considered 'relevant' to the decision making process.

C) A Constitutional Republic - The most well known document for the United States of America, stems from a piece of parchment know as 'The US Constitution'. That goverment follows the Constitution down to the letter, and understood only in the most strict of manners. And as such, if its not in the document, it doesnt really exist. This school of thought, generally has problems with reality, since, as the creation of said document, the United States, has expanded said document, with additional 17 Amendments.

D) The New World Order - Both political parties in the USA, Republican, and Democrat, are in fact, one. Not only are they one organzation, but both ruled by group of individuals, in some shadow organization. Tens of millions of US Citizens, are merely slaves and serfs, clueless to the real energy and control being exerted on them, and others. And that this organization, now has its claws in to all the industrial countries and many developing countries of the world, regardless of the 'base' goverment.

A 'few' years ago, Sid Meir produced a game, 'Alpha Centauri'. Within that game, one of the goverment types (since it was basically another Sid Meir game, 'Civilization' in space), was know as a 'virtual democracy'. The idea that, a citizen at any time, could 'plug in' to some device, and vote on a bill being voted on. That their vote, with others, would decide the issue. While the idea, takes the concept of 'Democracy' to a much more active level, the game (and limitations), could not take into account the reality of to accomplishing that feat in the 'real world'. I'm sure anyone who put five minutes towards the concept would find the most obvious hurdles first. Still, a 'Virtual Democracy' would be as close to the 'pure Democracy' often debated by educated types.

The real issue, with each goverment type, is that, none of them have worked, largely due to the concepts being 'perfect'. As it is known, us humans, rarily get simple stuff, like tying our shoes, balancing our check books, or even behaving in a sane manner at town hall meetings.....perfect. So, each goverment type, when in a perfect enviroment, would work perfectly for the citizens of that nation. Even Despotism (dictatorship), in a perfect enviroment would be good for the citizenry. Unfortunately, human habits, pettinesses, and hatreds get in the way. As the wisdom goes, it is much easier to destroy a potted plant, rather then help it grow and bear fruit for all.

But, E3, as you may have learned, most people on here, lack the ability to really express concepts. They can handle 1-4 lines of text, but anything beyond it, and their brains just shuts down. The ability to think in-depth on concepts, really is lost on most people. Yes, they will say, that indepth thought is good for the country and the soul, but rarily do such. Even though, that is the best way of dealing with many of the problems currently faced by the United States. As the component of 'patience' is often ingored, as a corner stone of every form of goverment. Another would be 'knowledge' in that, the igorant and foolish, believe they fully understand an issue to deal with it correctly. A third, and not any less important, would be 'responsiblity'; a concept often shouted for, but also being hard to accomplish. I'm sure, others could put forth an arguement on other 'corner' stones that would be equally valid for the United States.

And given the complex nature of the United States of America, the building, to which these 'corner' stones rests on, is not rectangular, but many-sided. The White House, of today, is not just one box, but a collection of inter-connected buildings to form the whole.

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Communism and Socialism.. the devil? - 7/31/2010 9:04:45 AM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

Hello E3,

D) The New World Order - Both political parties in the USA, Republican, and Democrat, are in fact, one. Not only are they one organzation, but both ruled by group of individuals, in some shadow organization. Tens of millions of US Citizens, are merely slaves and serfs, clueless to the real energy and control being exerted on them, and others. And that this organization, now has its claws in to all the industrial countries and many developing countries of the world, regardless of the 'base' goverment.

The real issue, with each goverment type, is that, none of them have worked, largely due to the concepts being 'perfect'. As it is known, us humans, rarily get simple stuff, like tying our shoes, balancing our check books, or even behaving in a sane manner at town hall meetings.....perfect. So, each goverment type, when in a perfect enviroment, would work perfectly for the citizens of that nation. Even Despotism (dictatorship), in a perfect enviroment would be good for the citizenry. Unfortunately, human habits, pettinesses, and hatreds get in the way. As the wisdom goes, it is much easier to destroy a potted plant, rather then help it grow and bear fruit for all.

First You would be correct in my view that the NWO is a cabal as history has warned 'the power behind the thrown.' Political parties are just another institution to manipulate and the group about which Kennedy warned against and many say, was why he was killed and yes, by the CIA.

The second point I disagree with. There has never been a postulation that a free market and certainly not capitalism is going to be 'perfect.'

But the genius of John Locke (Enlightenment) and Thomas Paine in his paper called 'Common Sense' in that reason...yes, the human intellect's ability to reason gives him the power to form society in its own collective self-interest.

That reason formed the basis of 'liberal' (free) society and also reasoning within that philosophy that all other govts. suffer from the evil, avarice and greed of man. In comes the conservative implementation of liberal govt. Man was a venal being so...the formation of govt. becomes 'the evil necessity' formed to protect man from govt. and...from man himself.

Man can be shown throughout history...to be power-hungry, venal, greedy and thus in the seats of govt. are the seedlings of corrupt govt. The checks and balances were to effect a governing equality to prevent too much power in one branch of govt. or area of influence over society.

So it is Locke and Paine who inform us that any despotism or party (group) within government's and its direct control over society...breeds corruption and cannot last.

Our govt. in the US as currently instituted with the unbalanced power of the minority...cannot last.

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: Communism and Socialism.. the devil? - 7/31/2010 9:10:38 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: StrangerThan

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

Honestly, I could give a shit less about the population of Detroit or those who complain that cheap food is full of fat and calories - which is where this started. It's full of fat and calories if you choose to eat it. What it boils down to is choices and who or what you're going to be beholden to. Most folks are too lazy to do much more than go to the grocer and complain about the prices. Fine. Got no problem with them or the choice they made. All I am saying is there are other options if you choose to pursue them.


Too easily dismissed, ST. The issue is that inner cities lack grocery stores and nutritional food choices and the means of transportation to go out to the countryside for a day of shopping the farms.


The larger issue in the communist/capitalist debate is that we're not switching forms any time in the foreseeable future. If you want something easily dismissed, it's more the thought that someone else must provide it for me. It's the listless, I have no choice but to eat shitty foods, end up obese,  and spend my time explaining why that's someone elses fault concept that gets the eye roll. Get off your ass and do something if you want it to change. If that's not good enough, then sit around and whine and complain. Neither really makes a difference to me.

I know what big cities are like. I've lived in half a dozen of them. Nor am I positing anything for the benefit of society. I'm saying, you have choices. Choose what you will, but understand in the greater scheme of things the idea of ultimate responsibility. Eating at taco bell and McDonald's most of your life because someone didn't plop a farmers co-opt on your city block is, for many people, a choice.

And as I write this, my girl says, will you get some pop-tarts when you go out?

lol


ST, there are big cities and then there are horrendously impoverished neighborhoods with nonexisting infrastructure. I never said people were sitting around blaming others. That is the assumption made by exteme "personal responsibility" types. It is dismissively cavalier and based upon idealistic libertarian myth. Not only do "pr" types choose to remain blind to the problem created by lack of infrastructure, they denigrate "community organizers" who try to teach the people how to help themselves, and then they insist the folk are just sitting on their lazy asses and making wrong choices. It is a no win image of the poor and a self-satisfied, pumped up, feel good doctrine for those who subscribe to idealistic libertarianism. It is a "look how wonderful we are and how dumb and lazy they are" delusion.

Living in cities is not the same as knowing the people who live in cities. Do not make yourself an expert on urban blight unless you have the credentials and the solution to overcome decayed infrastructure.

< Message edited by vincentML -- 7/31/2010 9:14:13 AM >


_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to StrangerThan)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: Communism and Socialism.. the devil? - 7/31/2010 11:51:45 AM   
StrangerThan


Posts: 1515
Joined: 4/25/2008
Status: offline
vincent

I'm not trying to make myself an expert on urban blight. For all her inability to choose distinct names, maria, maria from Brooklyn taught me an important lesson - namely what one can do with what one has if one chooses to do so and steps out of the stereotypes. It never ceases to amaze me how many people in this county cannot do simple things like fix a broken outlet, repair a broken pipe, put a fan belt on a car for heaven's sake. One doesn't need to be an expert to see what's wrong with one's existence.

What I do know is that every form of government and every type of economy has and will produce the types of areas and problems we are discussing. You can treat it as a constant in the equation. Some types will do more, some less but all have periods wherein they simply let the situation lie and fester. What is lost in all of the debate is the person, the independence, ability and capability of that person. What I'm saying has no effect on systems of government. It's tied more to the individual and to the lesson that maria, maria taught me and that is, you can simply exist within the framework you've been given or work with what you have. There are always choices. Whether or not your existence improves or degrades is tied to many variables, some outside your control, but some within it.

Enough. This is too much discussion on a rainy Saturday morning. I have stories to write and wind chimes to build.

Later.




_____________________________


--'Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to reform' - Mark Twain

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: Communism and Socialism.. the devil? - 7/31/2010 5:23:28 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: StrangerThan

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

Even if you don't grow it yourself, visits to the local farmers and a few days work during summer months can provide enough food to last most of the winter.


You do not seem to know much about farming.
I have been a subsistance farmer for the past 25 years and I still spend about $600 dollars a year in the grocery store. I do not grow chocolate, coffee or wheat. Consequently I need to purchase bread,coffee and chocolate(life without chocolate is barely existence) as well as salt and other spices.
It would be more than a bit presumptious to claim that 10,000 square feet of garden qualifies as a farm but it takes somewhat more than a few days a year to make it produce what I need.



I never said you could grow everything you eat, but if you're only spending 600 a year, you're making my point for me.

Your point was that it only takes a few days of labor to do this and that is not the case. It is not terribly hard work but it requires quite a bit more than a few days. The cost of food in the super market is always going to be less than the cost of food produced in my garden even if I figgure my time at minimum wage (which I have never worked for in my life). The major advantage of growing ones own food is that one can control the quality. My food is organic no pesticides and no preservatives.

And even if you don't grow it, this time of year you can put back enough to last a good portion of the winter by buying it at local farms and farmers markets. Go to the grocery store and spend $3 or so for 5 pounds of potatoes. You can buy a 50 pound bag for less than $10 if you spend a little time looking. Tomatoes go by the bushel. Corn as well. No, you won't find everything but you can cut your food bills by a rather large percentage with a few days work simply by buying it this time of year in the right places and preserving it.

Again, not everything, but a good portion.

$600 a year? Do you realize that the food bill for a family of 4 can easily top $1000 a month?

So a family of one would be $250 per month I spend about $50 per month...consider that working 40 hours a month (1 1/2 hours a day) in your garden at $5 per hour. I am sure you can do the math.



(in reply to StrangerThan)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Communism and Socialism.. the devil? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109