RE: Politics and religion. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


MeenMrMustard -> RE: Politics and religion. (7/31/2010 1:09:54 PM)

quote:

Politics and religion are control.


Those who wallow in politics and in religion wallow in emotion, not logic.

The current system creates perceived scarcity, which itself breeds fear.

Logic will not go far on a playing field of fear.




brainiacsub -> RE: Politics and religion. (7/31/2010 1:23:45 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: dbloomer

[...]I've perused your thread and it's clear to me you're more interested in conflict than getting at the truth. I'll be skipping past your posts from here on in.


Truth implies facts and logic. You've supplied very little of either. This is what others in this thread have been trying to tell you.




AquaticSub -> RE: Politics and religion. (7/31/2010 1:46:56 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MeenMrMustard

quote:

Politics and religion are control.


Those who wallow in politics and in religion wallow in emotion, not logic.

The current system creates perceived scarcity, which itself breeds fear.

Logic will not go far on a playing field of fear.


Are we Vulcan now? Didn't we learn anything from Star Trek? A society based solely on logic does not a utopia make.




MstrPBK -> RE: Politics and religion. (7/31/2010 2:04:09 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: AquaticSub
Are we Vulcan now? Didn't we learn anything from Star Trek? A society based solely on logic does not a utopia make.


Dinotopia Reference: Saurians weren't much better either ...
come to think of it (Star Wars reference): Neither were the Jedi ...

... and a host of others if I gave myself time to think. Politics, Religion, and the civilian have been locked in a nver ending battle of what is right and wrong since the time Man conceived of religion, and politics. I think Babylon 5 came closest to expressing this never ending fight for power or balance.

Personally it is important to be able to convey a balance within ones own life on a day to day basis which is more important

MatrPBK
St. Paul, MN USA




RedStapler -> RE: Politics and religion. (7/31/2010 5:06:12 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: heartcream

Looking out for yourself is a healthy and righteous approach to take to living one's life. This does in no way mean we need to exploit any one else in order to look out for ourselves and do the right thing for ourselves. Two totally different things.

When one has unmoved fear lying undercurrent this will motivate someone to do things they dont necessarily feel aligned with. This is action motivated by denied emotion and it happens all over the place all the time.


I think you misunderstood me. I never said anything about exploiting others. Greed does not necessarily imply exploitation. One can try to get ahead without stepping on others. What I am saying is that I see nothing wrong with trying to get ahead, even if that means I leave some behind that are less fortunate. I have done them no wrong just by being more successful. My inner beliefs and emotions are satisfied.




RedStapler -> RE: Politics and religion. (7/31/2010 5:26:33 PM)

quote:

Statistics have shown we could easily feed everyone on the planet given the resources we have.


Statistics have also shown that if everyone in the world lived like the average American, we would need FIVE earths to sustain that level of consumption. Thus, people in the developed world would need a DRAMATIC reduction in consumption before we could live in a world where everyone had a similar standard of living. And that just isn't going to happen.

Scarcity still exists. It doesn't end when there is enough food production to feed everyone. There has to be infrastructure in place to get that food to everyone. There have to be stable, non-corrupt governments in place to prevent the theft of food aid. And that being said, people everywhere WANT much more than the bare amount of food necessary for subsistence. They want art and music. They want sports and television and movies. They want air conditioning in the summer and heat in the winter.

As methods of production and transportation get more efficient, the situation will improve. But it is going to be a VERY long time before scarcity is eliminated (Star Trek envisions such a society). Until that time, capitalism will continue to be, by far, the best economic system available.




RedStapler -> RE: Politics and religion. (7/31/2010 5:35:52 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: dbloomer

quote:



It was in response to your comment about the end of greed and private interests as a driving force in decision making.  What I meant was that greed is part of human nature, and therefore humans will always tend to make choices that reflect their private interests.  Even if you create an alternative incentive system, people will always do what is in their self-interest.  Maybe others would call it something else, but I would still call this greed even if the incentive is no longer monetary profit.  It could be social status or something else intangible.  But people will always look out for themselves first.



1) Greed is an unfortunate necessity for survival when resources are scarce, not NECESSARILY an element of human nature.
2) Even if greed WERE human nature, which it isn't in my opinion, So What? We do many things contrary to human nature or natural law. We smoke cigarettes and give ourselves cancer, we sit in front of a TV for hours at a time, motionless, we put blades on our feet and stand on sheets of ice, pushing a peice of rubber around with wooden sticks (hockey).

The point is, we posess the capacity to change our behavior when it's beneficial to do so. In capitalism, it's beneficial to be greedy, so people are greedy. This is an UNDENIABLE fact. People, EVERYONE in this day and age, believe greed is part of human nature, despite the fact that none of them have done any research to prove this fact other than examine the world around them. Well of COURSE a world that rewards greed will result in a greedy world. The problem is with the establishment more-so than the people.



One thing that is definitely a part of human nature is the desire for POWER. This type of greed may not be in everybody, but it exists in enough people that I cannot imagine that it will ever go away. This desire created the great empires and civilizations of the past, but it also leads to war and its associated evils like famine and genocide. And for those who have it, it is insatiable. History is filled with leaders who's lust for power propelled them to greatness and, in many cases, led to their downfall. These leaders lived or could have lived lives of extreme opulence and luxury, but they chose to pursue more power instead.




dbloomer -> RE: Politics and religion. (7/31/2010 8:19:21 PM)

quote:


One thing that is definitely a part of human nature is the desire for POWER. This type of greed may not be in everybody, but it exists in enough people that I cannot imagine that it will ever go away. This desire created the great empires and civilizations of the past, but it also leads to war and its associated evils like famine and genocide. And for those who have it, it is insatiable. History is filled with leaders who's lust for power propelled them to greatness and, in many cases, led to their downfall. These leaders lived or could have lived lives of extreme opulence and luxury, but they chose to pursue more power instead.


What you're failing to take in to account is how much influence one person can have. Hitler rose to power and influenced nazi germany in a terrible way. You could say the holocaust was just "a natural by-product of human nature and the desire for power, greed, and corruption", or you could look at it for what it ACTUALLY was, a small group of people in a big position of power. The above example is precisely why control mechanisms like the money system, religion, and politics need to be done away with (amongst many many more significant reasons). So that individual people can't achieve positions of unimaginable power.

quote:


This type of greed may not be in everybody, but it exists in enough people that I cannot imagine that it will ever go away.


Just because you can't envision a possibility does not make that possibility any less viable, as history has shown us time, and time, and time again.




kinkbound -> RE: Politics and religion. (7/31/2010 10:07:56 PM)

quote:

Just because you can't envision a possibility does not make that possibility any less viable, as history has shown us time, and time, and time again.


Use that as your signature. It works.




popeye1250 -> RE: Politics and religion. (7/31/2010 10:14:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: dbloomer

quote:


One thing that is definitely a part of human nature is the desire for POWER. This type of greed may not be in everybody, but it exists in enough people that I cannot imagine that it will ever go away. This desire created the great empires and civilizations of the past, but it also leads to war and its associated evils like famine and genocide. And for those who have it, it is insatiable. History is filled with leaders who's lust for power propelled them to greatness and, in many cases, led to their downfall. These leaders lived or could have lived lives of extreme opulence and luxury, but they chose to pursue more power instead.


What you're failing to take in to account is how much influence one person can have. Hitler rose to power and influenced nazi germany in a terrible way. You could say the holocaust was just "a natural by-product of human nature and the desire for power, greed, and corruption", or you could look at it for what it ACTUALLY was, a small group of people in a big position of power. The above example is precisely why control mechanisms like the money system, religion, and politics need to be done away with (amongst many many more significant reasons). So that individual people can't achieve positions of unimaginable power.

quote:


This type of greed may not be in everybody, but it exists in enough people that I cannot imagine that it will ever go away.


Just because you can't envision a possibility does not make that possibility any less viable, as history has shown us time, and time, and time again.




Wow, polite people insulting each other.




Arpig -> RE: Politics and religion. (8/1/2010 5:10:53 AM)

quote:

People, EVERYONE in this day and age, believe greed is part of human nature, despite the fact that none of them have done any research to prove this fact other than examine the world around them.
I have done my research, I have read extensively on history...all periods and most parts of the world...and greed does indeed appear as a constant




jlf1961 -> RE: Politics and religion. (8/1/2010 5:30:32 AM)

Gene Roddenberry envisioned a future where everyone was equal, race, wealth, greed were not an issue.

The problem with trying to bring that to reality is that human nature prevents it from happening.

And believing that humans, as a race, have achieved a point in evolution where greed and power are not the driving force of human nature is a bit foolish.




thishereboi -> RE: Politics and religion. (8/1/2010 7:30:41 AM)

quote:

I've perused your thread and it's clear to me you're more interested in conflict than getting at the truth. I'll be skipping past your posts from here on in.


this would have been a lot more believable if you hadn't turned around and pulled a 4 month old thread just to respond to her.

http://www.collarchat.com/m_3183892/mpage_5/tm.htm




truckinslave -> RE: Politics and religion. (8/1/2010 8:22:05 AM)

quote:

Greed does not necessarily imply exploitation.


The fact of it is that capitalism takes one of the seven deadly sins- greed, obviously- and uses graduated taxation to turn it to the public good. If it wasn't for the people smart enough and hard-working enough to get PhDs in chemistry and engineering and medicine, if it wasn't for people willing to do the dangerous work of society for a little more money, if it wasn't for people who think of a 40-hour week as a vacation, the "disadvantaged" of our country would be dealing with starvation, not obesity. They would be huddled around fires, if they could find something to burn, not sitting in a free/subsidized apartment with electricity, running water, and cable TV.

greed in our country has exactly the opposite effect of exploitation.




truckinslave -> RE: Politics and religion. (8/1/2010 8:30:16 AM)

quote:

all periods and most parts of the world...and greed does indeed appear as a constant


It amuses me to no end that there seems to be a substantial overlap between a belief in millions of years of human evolution, and a belief that the psyche of mankind can be changed virtually overnight.

It's my belief that that's the central failing of communism/socialism- they to whatever extent ignore human nature.
It just is not in our DNA to "share and share alike", to work as hard for others as we will for ourselves and our spouses and children (that ideal is most nearly realized, imo, by soldiers....).

I'm sure that not all socialists are lazy people; but I'm pretty sure that a lot of lazy people believe in socialism.




vincentML -> RE: Politics and religion. (8/1/2010 8:46:36 AM)

quote:

What you're failing to take in to account is how much influence one person can have. Hitler rose to power and influenced nazi germany in a terrible way. You could say the holocaust was just "a natural by-product of human nature and the desire for power, greed, and corruption", or you could look at it for what it ACTUALLY was, a small group of people in a big position of power. The above example is precisely why control mechanisms like the money system, religion, and politics need to be done away with (amongst many many more significant reasons). So that individual people can't achieve positions of unimaginable power.


"A small group of people in a big position of power" fails to take into account the fifteen hundred year history of Jew hatred in Europe that preceded the holocaust and it fails to take into account the official silence of Pope Pius XII during the holocaust.

It also shows ignorance of Hannah Arendt's concept of the "banality of evil."

quote:

In her reporting of the Eichmann trial for The New Yorker, which evolved into Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (1963), she coined the phrase "the banality of evil" to describe Eichmann. She raised the question of whether evil is radical or simply a function of thoughtlessness—the tendency of ordinary people to obey orders and conform to mass opinion without critically thinking about the results of their action or inaction.


Sometimes events cannot be reduced to such a simple premise as you stated in your OP that politics and religion are control. Politics and religion may be simple avatars fo more complex interactions of history and sociology.




vincentML -> RE: Politics and religion. (8/1/2010 8:52:14 AM)

quote:

The fact of it is that capitalism takes one of the seven deadly sins- greed, obviously- and uses graduated taxation to turn it to the public good.


Well hell man! Capitalists fought vigorously against the Sixteenth Amendment. And today they bleat endlessly for tax reductions.

They cannot now appropriate the graduated income tax as a Capitalist Virtue. Bah!




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875