Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity >> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? Page: <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't A... - 8/3/2010 12:56:02 PM   
Lockit


Posts: 11292
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: udaboss


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lockit

quote:

ORIGINAL: udaboss

In response to Lockit:

Doesn't surprise me at all.

But you're making my point. I said "at least" half the males on CM were subs and was told, no, it's much less than that.




I am counting from MO alone and yes many nicks are dark blue... some should be light blue. Then we have the multiple accounts by the same person. The numbers could never be counted or add up to anything of worth.

And why is this the only thing I said that you address?



Why just Missouri? CM has user profiles from all over the world.


Good lord you are being dense. You supposedly read my profile, how many times? I am looking for local only. I don't do long distance because I have and it doesn't work for me. I want a hard or soft body, right here where I can get at him. Duh.... I don't care what the rest of the world is doing... just whats going on in my lil world.

_____________________________

No matter how old a woman gets, some men will think she was born yesterday! ROFL... I love this place!


(in reply to udaboss)
Profile   Post #: 181
RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't A... - 8/3/2010 12:56:30 PM   
udaboss


Posts: 46
Joined: 5/12/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

quote:

ORIGINAL: udaboss
Do a text search. MALES --ORIENTATION: any THEY ARE SEEKING: any Do it on the basis of both "LAST ON" and "JOINED."

See how many are light blue and how many are dark blue.

'nuff said

I was curious, so I did it.  At best, you have Me by a 5% margin of error.  For My location (within 100 miles) and the age parameter that I set:

Last on - 65% Dom and 35% sub.

Joining date - 68% Dom and 32% sub.

Keep in mind that anybody checking the seeking "friends" would show up here.  Also, these numbers include all sexual orientations, so those who are gay are still in the percentiles.



Sorry, no way. Or you somehow got a result totally different from mine.

Joined (and this shouldn't change significantly for a few hours) first page -- 9 doms 16 subs. For reference, subboy 7330 was at the top.

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 182
RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't A... - 8/3/2010 12:58:12 PM   
udaboss


Posts: 46
Joined: 5/12/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lockit

quote:

ORIGINAL: udaboss


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lockit

quote:

ORIGINAL: udaboss

In response to Lockit:

Doesn't surprise me at all.

But you're making my point. I said "at least" half the males on CM were subs and was told, no, it's much less than that.




I am counting from MO alone and yes many nicks are dark blue... some should be light blue. Then we have the multiple accounts by the same person. The numbers could never be counted or add up to anything of worth.

And why is this the only thing I said that you address?



Why just Missouri? CM has user profiles from all over the world.


Good lord you are being dense. You supposedly read my profile, how many times? I am looking for local only. I don't do long distance because I have and it doesn't work for me. I want a hard or soft body, right here where I can get at him. Duh.... I don't care what the rest of the world is doing... just whats going on in my lil world.


That's not what this thread is about. It's about a CM feature to filter out dommes who are here for money.

< Message edited by udaboss -- 8/3/2010 1:02:30 PM >

(in reply to Lockit)
Profile   Post #: 183
RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't A... - 8/3/2010 12:59:55 PM   
VaguelyCurious


Posts: 5264
Joined: 12/2/2009
From: United Kingdom
Status: offline 		FR:

Earlier in the thread, one of the anteaters (I forget which) said they do not want other people to make up their minds for them.

Wouldn't a ratings feature be a really bad thing from that point of view?


_____________________________

Sthetic on FetLife.




(in reply to udaboss)
Profile   Post #: 184
RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't A... - 8/3/2010 1:01:00 PM   
MissAsylum


Posts: 1863
Joined: 1/9/2009
Status: offline 		getting rude disgusting remarks after sending a polite, "no thank you"- minimum of 6 times a week. getting the same copy/paste message from the same user and/or new profile of the same person that ends in rude remarks- at least 10 times a month.

_____________________________

I hate when I'm wearing my apple bottom jeans, but i can't find my boots with the fur.

(in reply to BoiJen)
Profile   Post #: 185
RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't A... - 8/3/2010 1:04:11 PM   
BoiJen


Posts: 2608
Joined: 3/7/2007
Status: offline 		Alright 4 individuals who can say that would expect low rating solely on the basis of a polite "no thank you"

anymore?


_____________________________


Clips of MsKitty doin' stuff to me. Support the fan club, buy a clip today.

(in reply to MissAsylum)
Profile   Post #: 186
RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't A... - 8/3/2010 1:04:56 PM   
udaboss


Posts: 46
Joined: 5/12/2005
Status: offline 		Gotta go folks. Stuff to do. Maybe I'll check back in tomorrow.

(in reply to MissAsylum)
Profile   Post #: 187
RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't A... - 8/3/2010 1:05:05 PM   
sappatoti


Posts: 14844
Joined: 10/30/2006
From: the edge of darkness...
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: udaboss


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

quote:

ORIGINAL: udaboss
Do a text search. MALES --ORIENTATION: any THEY ARE SEEKING: any Do it on the basis of both "LAST ON" and "JOINED."

See how many are light blue and how many are dark blue.

'nuff said

I was curious, so I did it.  At best, you have Me by a 5% margin of error.  For My location (within 100 miles) and the age parameter that I set:

Last on - 65% Dom and 35% sub.

Joining date - 68% Dom and 32% sub.

Keep in mind that anybody checking the seeking "friends" would show up here.  Also, these numbers include all sexual orientations, so those who are gay are still in the percentiles.



Sorry, no way. Or you somehow got a result totally different from mine.

Joined (and this shouldn't change significantly for a few hours) first page -- 9 doms 16 subs. For reference, subboy 7330 was at the top.


To throw another wrinkle into all of this...

I'm using a computer/browser combination, apparently, that doesn't work with the sort criteria of "Joined." If I use that sort, my results come up as a "no matches" type of response.

The only sort criteria that works for me is "Last On."

My point here is, this site is based upon software written specifically for the Microsoft IIS line of server software. It is NOT 100% compatible with non-Windows operating systems and non-Microsoft browsers (perhaps not even 100% compatible WITH Microsoft browsers). Thus, some features may or may not work for every user on this site. Adding additional categories and hoping the users are honest enough to use them is a great idea, but the whole thing falls apart when someone creates a profile, or writes a message or post, or performs searches when this site is not compatible with what the user is using for equipment and software.

So, argue all you'd like about whether a feature would be useful or not. Just remember that the results of those features may not be as you expect due to the number of users using somewhat incompatible systems.

_____________________________

Never mind the man on the edge of the darkness... he means no harm...

"Community, Identity, Stability." ~ A Brave New World, Aldous Huxley, 1932

If you don't like my attitude, QUIT TALKING TO ME!

(in reply to udaboss)
Profile   Post #: 188
RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't A... - 8/3/2010 1:06:46 PM   
VaguelyCurious


Posts: 5264
Joined: 12/2/2009
From: United Kingdom
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoiJen

anymore?

Oooh, me! I don't do polite refusals any more-I just block and delete now...

(Of course then they sometimes use secondary profiles to complain that I've blocked their primary ones...)


_____________________________

Sthetic on FetLife.




(in reply to BoiJen)
Profile   Post #: 189
RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't A... - 8/3/2010 1:07:30 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: udaboss


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact
I was curious, so I did it.  At best, you have Me by a 5% margin of error.  For My location (within 100 miles) and the age parameter that I set:

Last on - 65% Dom and 35% sub.

Joining date - 68% Dom and 32% sub.

Keep in mind that anybody checking the seeking "friends" would show up here.  Also, these numbers include all sexual orientations, so those who are gay are still in the percentiles.



Sorry, no way. Or you somehow got a result totally different from mine.

Joined (and this shouldn't change significantly for a few hours) first page -- 9 doms 16 subs. For reference, subboy 7330 was at the top.

You are either using a different location or age bracket than I am.  The person that you reference isn't even on My list.  Are you searching CA?


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to udaboss)
Profile   Post #: 190
RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't A... - 8/3/2010 1:08:59 PM   
MissAsylum


Posts: 1863
Joined: 1/9/2009
Status: offline 		i'm not too keen on being put in the same catagory as a 1980s prom dress or a vintage steamtrunk. but thats just me.

_____________________________

I hate when I'm wearing my apple bottom jeans, but i can't find my boots with the fur.

(in reply to BoiJen)
Profile   Post #: 191
RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't A... - 8/3/2010 1:10:08 PM   
Lockit


Posts: 11292
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: udaboss

That's not what this thread is about. It's about a CM feature to filter out dommes who are here for money.


ROFL... So about now, you tag me for going off topic? Funny that! The conversation went to numbers which would be something that address's your first post and you question why I would only look at MO. which is where I live and still has a bit to do with where we both live and those that sign up at this site and then you call foul on me because I respond to your question?

Dude... lol

Simple fact is, your original op doesn't make a lot of sense because people lie! lol Yes.. they lie, they create multiple profiles sometimes from lots of locations and these are the real flesh and blood persons who live locally and piss people off and then come back at them with a new profile.

In the course of acting an adult and weeding through what I don't expect anyone else to do for me... I have a number of questions about certain profiles. You don't see me starting threads about them.


_____________________________

No matter how old a woman gets, some men will think she was born yesterday! ROFL... I love this place!


(in reply to udaboss)
Profile   Post #: 192
RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't A... - 8/3/2010 1:11:15 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoiJen

Alright 4 individuals who can say that would expect low rating solely on the basis of a polite "no thank you"

anymore?


Might as well add Me to that.  Considering that I block anyone who isn't from the forums or near My location, I'm sure to have pissed off a lot of people.


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to BoiJen)
Profile   Post #: 193
RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't A... - 8/3/2010 1:14:39 PM   
BoiJen


Posts: 2608
Joined: 3/7/2007
Status: offline 		So now we're up to 6 folks who get nasty stuff for being polite.

Really? Someone expects CM to be able to efficiently and effectively use a rating tool?


_____________________________


Clips of MsKitty doin' stuff to me. Support the fan club, buy a clip today.

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 194
RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't A... - 8/3/2010 1:18:22 PM   
SorceressJ


Posts: 2968
Joined: 7/24/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoiJen

1. All the Dommes reading, if you've gotten at least one nasty message from a polite "No, thank you", please say so.
2. If it's happened more than once, please say so.
3. If you've gotten the nasty stuff from one profile, said "no thank you" and then two months later gotten the same form letter AGAIN, please say so.

boi



1. Yes.
2. Yes. More than once from the same person/username, even. Not only that, I have received the same word-for-word message from the same user having made themselves a different profile.
3. Yes. At the risk of violating TOS, I will of course not name any names, but I am veritably certain that a username I've seen here today looks remarkably familiar in this regard. It went like this: first came the nasty response, then after I blocked him, the repeat visits so I would see him in my "Who's Viewing Me?" section (was this intended to impress?). Finding himself ignored, he got bored and went away, as good trolls do. Fortunately, when he visited my profile this time, he had gained enough gray cells to recognize me and say nothing. Thank you for that. *Big Smile!*

_____________________________

‎Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc. <93>)O(

(in reply to BoiJen)
Profile   Post #: 195
RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't A... - 8/3/2010 1:40:35 PM   
sappatoti


Posts: 14844
Joined: 10/30/2006
From: the edge of darkness...
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoiJen

So now we're up to 6 folks who get nasty stuff for being polite.

Really? Someone expects CM to be able to efficiently and effectively use a rating tool?



While I've not received nasty responses lately, I have had my fair share of those who just can't seem to grasp the concept of "No means NO." I've had to put a few on "block, hide, and delete" lately.

_____________________________

Never mind the man on the edge of the darkness... he means no harm...

"Community, Identity, Stability." ~ A Brave New World, Aldous Huxley, 1932

If you don't like my attitude, QUIT TALKING TO ME!

(in reply to BoiJen)
Profile   Post #: 196
RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't A... - 8/3/2010 1:41:23 PM   
dbloomer


Posts: 137
Joined: 7/9/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SorceressJ

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoiJen

1. All the Dommes reading, if you've gotten at least one nasty message from a polite "No, thank you", please say so.
2. If it's happened more than once, please say so.
3. If you've gotten the nasty stuff from one profile, said "no thank you" and then two months later gotten the same form letter AGAIN, please say so.

boi



1. Yes.
2. Yes. More than once from the same person/username, even. Not only that, I have received the same word-for-word message from the same user having made themselves a different profile.
3. Yes. At the risk of violating TOS, I will of course not name any names, but I am veritably certain that a username I've seen here today looks remarkably familiar in this regard. It went like this: first came the nasty response, then after I blocked him, the repeat visits so I would see him in my "Who's Viewing Me?" section (was this intended to impress?). Finding himself ignored, he got bored and went away, as good trolls do. Fortunately, when he visited my profile this time, he had gained enough gray cells to recognize me and say nothing. Thank you for that. *Big Smile!*


The fact that you didn't point the finger at anyone specifically leaves everyone free to point their finger and believe what they want to, which I'm sure you knew. Now anyone who disagrees with you on any subject is "That guy who was rude to you in a private message." Clever.

Add e-mail verification to Collarme and you'll see the amount of abuse around here reduced dramatically. Ask yourself why practically every other community website out there requires e-mail validation, but Collarme.com doesn't.

This more than anything is the #1 problem here. The reason they don't require e-mail verification is the same reason they don't implement the system we're advocating here of recognizing accounts as professional femdoms.

It will widdle down the userbase THAT much more, reducing the profitability of this place even further.

I will be withdrawing from this thread. Nobody wants to address the core issue. Instead, they want to burn the OP at the stake and pat eachother on the back, with some strange gang mentality.

As a final note, you might ask yourself WHY you receive so many angry posts from sub men looking for dommes, and you might consider the possibiltiy that a better system for maching subs with doms may actually result in more suitable matches for YOU, and a much happier inbox.




< Message edited by dbloomer -- 8/3/2010 1:58:41 PM >

(in reply to SorceressJ)
Profile   Post #: 197
RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't A... - 8/3/2010 1:48:43 PM   
sirsholly


Posts: 42360
Joined: 9/7/2007
From: Quietville
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella

[
Reading his profile, it seems he already is a Dom. He's pretty clear in telling his sub how he plans on running the household.

quote:

The man is to keep the house clean, cook, and do whatever errands or other duties he is directed to do by the female. The man is not even permitted to leave the house without the female's permission. That's just the way things are going to be.
.

This is called marriage.


_____________________________

PICKED UPON
TECHNO-DOLT
MEMBER OF THE SUBBIE MAFIA
GRACEFULLY CHALLENGED :::::splat:::::
BOOT WHORE
VAA/S FAN

GIVES GOOD HEART (Lushy)

CREATOR OF MAYHEM (practice)


(in reply to Elisabella)
Profile   Post #: 198
RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't A... - 8/3/2010 2:12:09 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: dbloomer
As a final note, you might ask yourself WHY you receive so many angry posts from sub men looking for dommes, and you might consider the possibiltiy that a better system for maching subs with doms may actually result in more suitable matches for YOU, and a much happier inbox.

You seriously don't get it, which, I happen to think is why you didn't address the post of My response earlier about having actual concern for My own sub (followed by sub male friends) on this site. 

Not all of us are here for matches.  The concerns of the seeking really aren't Mine.  The quagmire of the problems of the other side really don't effect Me.  It's not going to change what happens in My mail box.  Not the folks who don't read profiles.  Not the folks who are looking for online only.  Not the folks who write Me from the other side of the globe. 

What I think is being forgotten here is, even if flagging was implemented, that doesn't necessarily mean that every sub out there is going to find a lifestyle Domme that is actually interested in having a dynamic with him.  Finding a match on this site is no different than it is anywhere else.  Being on the internet doesn't change the fact that some folks aren't going to find what they are looking for because there isn't another party who wants to share a dynamic with them.  Even if every pro was flagged on this site, the fact that some people will not find what they are looking for isn't going to change.


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to dbloomer)
Profile   Post #: 199
RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't A... - 8/3/2010 2:15:18 PM   
Tantriqu


Posts: 2026
Joined: 12/29/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BoiJen

1. All the Dommes reading, if you've gotten at least one nasty message from a polite "No, thank you", please say so.
2. If it's happened more than once, please say so.
3. If you've gotten the nasty stuff from one profile, said "no thank you" and then two months later gotten the same form letter AGAIN, please say so.

boi



1. Hella yes, dozens of different ones, yet each with uniquely detailed threats of prolonged physical torture, sexual and other mutilation, forced pregnancy/prostitution/rape/sodomy, and death. Christ, put them all together, and you've got a Margaret Atwood novel! So, as someone mentioned above, I've stopped giving polite 'no, thanks', and just block and delete unless the message is from a male sub. Life's too short to read sociopathic ravings and /or unsolicited Aspbergeric flames from comp-sci types poisoned by vanilla-porn-fuelled impossiblities.
2. Hella yes, and also as someone mentioned above, frequently hidden under a new profile. Male switches, doms and female subs posting 'on behalf of their dom' are the foulest-mouthed. Ai yai yai. Dommes just tend to be verbal bullies, rather than detailing physical threats.
3. Yes to more contact months later under different profiles, no to a form letter.

(in reply to SorceressJ)
Profile   Post #: 200
Page:   <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity >> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? Page: <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094