quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella

quote:

ORIGINAL: lilboycaught

Well, silly girls can't stay on topic.

Because they can't argue their side.

Hahahahaha go fuck your sister.

quote:

ORIGINAL: lilboycaught

Like I said, silly girls can't stay on topic.

I find you, and Lockit, really sadly desperate to "win" and you don't address my points.

Decidedly hickish.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lockit

I knew if I looked hard enough, I would prove that udaboss and lilboycaught were the same person even if they did hide their profiles. I think there is another nick on this thread, but haven't looked for that yet. You can hide a profile... but not the posts! Funny, they show up and support one another on the same days. I have also seen all three from around where I live. And the old picture of problemchild looks very much like udaboss, but they are now hidden.

So here we have a thread started by udaboss http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=2774345  The thread I will never forget.

lilboylost shows up here http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=2774613

AHAHAHAHA OWNED

I'm betting dbloomer is one of them too because he called this thread "his thread" even though the OP was under a different name.

quote:

ORIGINAL: dbloomer

It's my thread because I'm the only one providing it with any kind of direction anymore. If this thread has proven anything, it's that I don't care what you think: I would never stoop to creating secret accounts, and I'm not aligned with those two outside of this thread. It's interesting to see the lengths you will go to to try and do what's referred to as a "character assassination".

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

I love this "it's the right thing to do" bit.  The righteous indignation thing just isn't working here.

To this point, every woman on this thread has said it's a bad idea.

To this point every male Dominant has said it's a bad idea.

To this point, CM has never felt the need to implement this idea.

Out of over 2,000 hits, only three or four (depending if some count as the same person) have said it's a good idea.

That's a pretty low percentage in My book.

That'

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aileen1968

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

Like many people, he has gotten caught up in the rigamoral. Once you get ging it can be hard to stop.


Why don't we use rigamoral anymore?

Or ging?

quote:

ORIGINAL: lilboycaught
No that's not true. Most of the females have made condescending and insulting remarks, and made, frankly, ridiculous objections if they even addressed the subject.

nearly ALL of the objections have come from the the lame "but-people-could-lie" nonsense. That has been addressed. People would lie.

That is not a valid reason not to do it because they can lie on every other aspect of their profile as well.

Besides, YOU wouldn't like it because you do it for money.

BTW< I utterly couldn't care less what a couple of male dominants said. This isn't about them.

quote:



What I'm asking is why pro-domme should be a special category to filter by.

I have no interest in unemployed men. Should there be a "broke ass" category to filter by?
I have no interest in men who can't spell. Should there be a "illiterate" category to filter by?

More on topic - money is a kink for some people. I think if there was a way to filter by ALL kinks it would be workable (then I would be able to report anyone who messaged me outside of my search parameters as a "scammer" - oh hey I kinda like this idea) but my main issue is that you're singling out the ONE group that YOU are not interested in as though you're completely oblivious to the fact that EVERYONE on this site gets message from people that THEY are not interested in.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tantriqu

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoiJen

1. All the Dommes reading, if you've gotten at least one nasty message from a polite "No, thank you", please say so.
2. If it's happened more than once, please say so.
3. If you've gotten the nasty stuff from one profile, said "no thank you" and then two months later gotten the same form letter AGAIN, please say so.

boi

1. Hella yes, dozens of different ones, yet each with uniquely detailed threats of prolonged physical torture, sexual and other mutilation, forced pregnancy/prostitution/rape/sodomy, and death. Christ, put them all together, and you've got a Margaret Atwood novel! So, as someone mentioned above, I've stopped giving polite 'no, thanks', and just block and delete unless the message is from a male sub. Life's too short to read sociopathic ravings and /or unsolicited Aspbergeric flames from comp-sci types poisoned by vanilla-porn-fuelled impossiblities.
2. Hella yes, and also as someone mentioned above, frequently hidden under a new profile. Male switches, doms and female subs posting 'on behalf of their dom' are the foulest-mouthed. Ai yai yai. Dommes just tend to be verbal bullies, rather than detailing physical threats.
3. Yes to more contact months later under different profiles, no to a form letter.