quote:

ORIGINAL: Saykiatric

Well done I am quite impressed...Tho I disagree with a few of your view points.

Photoghers rights: enjoy! it is quite educational. To escort anyone from public space with a camera violates their 1st
amendment rights.

http://www.krages.com/phoright.htm
http://carlosmiller.com/
http://content.photojojo.com/tips/legal-rights-of-photographers/

Get your knowledge on! you are welcome.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoiJen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Saykiatric

Well done I am quite impressed...Tho I disagree with a few of your view points.

Photographers rights: enjoy! it is quite educational. To escort anyone from public space with a camera violates their 1st
amendment rights.

http://www.krages.com/phoright.htm
http://carlosmiller.com/
http://content.photojojo.com/tips/legal-rights-of-photographers/

Get your knowledge on! you are welcome.

The 1st amendment applies to "public" or government owned properties. Restaurants, homes, businesses, etc are all privately owned. To escort someone away from a business taht is privately own violates no one's rights.

quote:

ORIGINAL: domiguy

Very little desire as I don't see anything very positive being derived from going. Might be a great people watching event, but beyond that there would be little point in attending.

Way too particular about who I choose to hangout with. bdsm is not a big enough of a draw to think that my or other's interests in bdsm would supersede our presonal interaction or relationship. It is a personal and a private relationship interet and I feel very little need share it with strangers other than my sub or the few people that I dig hanging around with. (and that can tolerate me)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ShaharThorne

If someone trys to take a picture of me, I cover my face discreetly.  I hate being the object in any photos.

You mention first amendment right...I mention models release...I refuse to sign one.  Therefore, the photo is moot and should be trashed.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Saykiatric
VERY nice angle.........However I will be kind enough to clear up how and why modeling consents come into play. Pick a public setting of your choice. someone just bought a camera and is taking picture of everything that catches their eye. You happen to be the subject and without you ever knowing it your picture is taken. They add it perhaps to their  portfolio to show people what wonderful work they do. Your picture can be put on the web in a newspaper article front page even. Really there is not a thing you can do about it. Now when someone would ask you to sign a Modeling Consent would  be if they were going to use your person for commercial gain that is the only time a modeling consent is required. So to recap you in public unaware and it has happened to nearly all of us if you have ever been to a theme park we all appear in peoples vacation photos at some point or another. You do not see people wielding Model consent forms at Disney World which can be argued is "private property" So unless someone intends to use your image for commercial gain you might as well smile wide as their isnt a thing you can do about it. It comes down to the ethics of the Photographer. Tell us we "cant" and we will do just that. Ask us please do not most of us will respect that as we are not out to make anyone uncomfortable. The Orlando munch has posted NO CAMERAS...this reads to me please come with your camera and come in numbers. They did also forget to post NO VIDEO as two of my 5 cameras are Hybrids meaning Vid Still capable with 18 X built in Zooms.Very good though "should be moot" is a wish not the law.

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

quote:

ORIGINAL: Saykiatric
VERY nice angle.........However I will be kind enough to clear up how and why modeling consents come into play. Pick a public setting of your choice. someone just bought a camera and is taking picture of everything that catches their eye. You happen to be the subject and without you ever knowing it your picture is taken. They add it perhaps to their  portfolio to show people what wonderful work they do. Your picture can be put on the web in a newspaper article front page even. Really there is not a thing you can do about it. Now when someone would ask you to sign a Modeling Consent would  be if they were going to use your person for commercial gain that is the only time a modeling consent is required. So to recap you in public unaware and it has happened to nearly all of us if you have ever been to a theme park we all appear in peoples vacation photos at some point or another. You do not see people wielding Model consent forms at Disney World which can be argued is "private property" So unless someone intends to use your image for commercial gain you might as well smile wide as their isnt a thing you can do about it. It comes down to the ethics of the Photographer. Tell us we "cant" and we will do just that. Ask us please do not most of us will respect that as we are not out to make anyone uncomfortable. The Orlando munch has posted NO CAMERAS...this reads to me please come with your camera and come in numbers. They did also forget to post NO VIDEO as two of my 5 cameras are Hybrids meaning Vid Still capable with 18 X built in Zooms.Very good though "should be moot" is a wish not the law.

If that's the case, why haven't you patronized the Woodshed and tried your marvelous idea?  If I recall correctly, you haven't been there or at minimum don't go often enough to recall what the charge is at the door.  Please do let us know how it turns out.

Nothing like a Dominant who just screams "I don't care about consent".  Lots of play time in your future, I'll bet.

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

quote:

ORIGINAL: Saykiatric
VERY nice angle.........However I will be kind enough to clear up how and why modeling consents come into play. Pick a public setting of your choice. someone just bought a camera and is taking picture of everything that catches their eye. You happen to be the subject and without you ever knowing it your picture is taken. They add it perhaps to their  portfolio to show people what wonderful work they do. Your picture can be put on the web in a newspaper article front page even. Really there is not a thing you can do about it. Now when someone would ask you to sign a Modeling Consent would  be if they were going to use your person for commercial gain that is the only time a modeling consent is required. So to recap you in public unaware and it has happened to nearly all of us if you have ever been to a theme park we all appear in peoples vacation photos at some point or another. You do not see people wielding Model consent forms at Disney World which can be argued is "private property" So unless someone intends to use your image for commercial gain you might as well smile wide as their isnt a thing you can do about it. It comes down to the ethics of the Photographer. Tell us we "cant" and we will do just that. Ask us please do not most of us will respect that as we are not out to make anyone uncomfortable. The Orlando munch has posted NO CAMERAS...this reads to me please come with your camera and come in numbers. They did also forget to post NO VIDEO as two of my 5 cameras are Hybrids meaning Vid Still capable with 18 X built in Zooms.Very good though "should be moot" is a wish not the law.

If that's the case, why haven't you patronized the Woodshed and tried your marvelous idea?  If I recall correctly, you haven't been there or at minimum don't go often enough to recall what the charge is at the door.  Please do let us know how it turns out.

Nothing like a Dominant who just screams "I don't care about consent".  Lots of play time in your future, I'll bet.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Saykiatric

It comes down to the ethics of the Photographer.
 
Tell us we "cant" and we will do just that.
 
The Orlando munch has posted NO CAMERAS...this reads to me please come with your camera and come in numbers.

quote:

ORIGINAL: CynthiaWVirginia

quote:

ORIGINAL: Saykiatric

It comes down to the ethics of the Photographer.
 
Tell us we "cant" and we will do just that.
 
The Orlando munch has posted NO CAMERAS...this reads to me please come with your camera and come in numbers.

 

Yes, I can clearly see your ethics as can everyone else. 

Camera toting asshats should be bent over a table and the camera shoved...somewhere... 
 
I was used as a human interest story on the news once, closeups on tv without my consent or knowledge.  It was a very big camera, supposedly turned off.  No, I wouldn't have bothered with vaseline. 

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

I'm not going to quote your incoherent post above.  (The bold makes it very difficult to read, as does your difficulty with sentence structure.)

The following information was taken from website for the Woodshed.

It is a private club.  While the address was not provided on the site, a phone number was.  Under their FAQ section, number 17 addresses photography.  Their policy is that there are no recording devices permitted during open hours.  If you rent the club privately during off hours, photo and video shoots are welcome. 

Membership fees are twenty dollars per person.  Attending the club is a twenty dollar entrance fee.  (That clears up the earlier question about if there are different rates for males/females/couples.)

So, there are the answers.  It took Me less than five minutes through google.