RE: Liberal Hate Speech

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: Liberal Hate Speech

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Liberal Hate Speech

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Liberal Hate Speech - 8/9/2010 5:26:14 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

And why should a non-american law degree have standing where american law is practiced?

Ah, but he was a Rhodes scholar.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to Moonhead)

Profile

Post #: 41

RE: Liberal Hate Speech - 8/9/2010 5:31:29 AM

Moonhead

Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

I don't think he was reading Law as his Rhodes in any case: wasn't it whatever they had instead of Politics and Philosophy in the '60s?

I just found poopy coming out with that line about him fleeing the country after sexually assaulting somebody a bit rich coming from someone who's making a big deal about the fact that he didn't get his Rhodes sheepskin from Oxford. If he wants to make a big deal of sticking rigorously to the facts, spouting drivel like that is a bit hypocritical. Still, one rule for him and a stricter one for the hateful liberal speakers, I suppose.

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to mnottertail)

Profile

Post #: 42

RE: Liberal Hate Speech - 8/9/2010 9:45:46 AM

popeye1250

Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

I don't think he was reading Law as his Rhodes in any case: wasn't it whatever they had instead of Politics and Philosophy in the '60s?

I just found poopy coming out with that line about him fleeing the country after sexually assaulting somebody a bit rich coming from someone who's making a big deal about the fact that he didn't get his Rhodes sheepskin from Oxford. If he wants to make a big deal of sticking rigorously to the facts, spouting drivel like that is a bit hypocritical. Still, one rule for him and a stricter one for the hateful liberal speakers, I suppose.

Twisty, you are the one who stated that Clinton "did" get a sheepskin from Oxford.
One rule for you and a stricter one for the "hateful" independant speakers I suppose. And what do you care about "liberals" anyway?
Yeah I guess Clinton just decided "not to graduate from Oxford" all on his own. Just like he *decided* "not to inhale." Right?
I saw him on the news the other week and his nose is bigger and redder than W.C. Fields'. His brother Roger said of him once; "When it comes to cocaine Bill's got a nose like a Hoover vacuum cleaner!"
And everytime he goes over to Ireland to the mansion and hangs out with "Bono" it gets bigger and redder for some reason.

_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to Moonhead)

Profile

Post #: 43

RE: Liberal Hate Speech - 8/9/2010 9:54:22 AM

popeye1250

Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

Vincent, since when do Americans have to be "nice" to Leftists/ Communists? How about Nazis,.. the KKK,..al qeada?
And I wasn't trying to be "slanderous" I was making fun of them because it's so easy!

Sorry to say I don't see anything amusing in your use of those terms. So, making fun is a stretch especially in a thread where the OP starts out with the shakey premise that only Libs can get away with being politically incorrect and claims they call all "true conservatives" racists, which is nonsense.

I presume the OP, however silly his premise is, complains about the lack of civility on the P&R Board. So, to answer your question directly, it is not a question of when to be "nice" to anyone but when to be civil to someone's freedom to express an opinion even if they are "Leftists/Communists" hiding as you say under the blanket of Liberalism. The answer to that imo is all the time because Freedom of speech is what we are about.

Additionally, I also find it kinda queasy that you see Leftist/Communists hiding under a blanket. That sounds so 1950s Joe McCarthy's "I have a list here of 200 State Department employees..." Or HUAC's "Are you now or have you ever been a member of ....?" I thought we were past all that nonsense and we were..... until it was revived in the 2008 presidential campaign.

Seems like some see enemies hiding everywhere. Or they see people "who are not like us." Or people who are not "true Americans." All insinuating, suggesting some dark conspiracy. The old, worn out "enemies within" gambit has been taken out and dusted off. But really all quite slanderous and in an underhanded manner.

Sorry that I can't be with you on this one, Popeye.

Vincent, thankyou for your concern old bean.
And I wouldn't be too concerned about the "Left's" ability to speak out.
They're very adept at hiding out under *someone else's* blanket.

_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to vincentML)

Profile

Post #: 44

RE: Liberal Hate Speech - 8/9/2010 11:15:35 AM

Moonhead

Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250
Yeah I guess Clinton just decided "not to graduate from Oxford" all on his own. Just like he *decided* "not to inhale." Right?.

You've got a source you can cite that he was deported for sexual assault, then?

< Message edited by Moonhead -- 8/9/2010 11:16:19 AM >

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to popeye1250)

Profile

Post #: 45

RE: Liberal Hate Speech - 8/9/2010 11:44:11 AM

popeye1250

Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250
Yeah I guess Clinton just decided "not to graduate from Oxford" all on his own. Just like he *decided* "not to inhale." Right?.

You've got a source you can cite that he was deported for sexual assault, then?

Twisty, THERE YOU GO AGAIN! Did I say he was *"DEPORTED*?"

_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to Moonhead)

Profile

Post #: 46

RE: Liberal Hate Speech - 8/9/2010 11:50:26 AM

Moonhead

Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

As you seem to have removed the completely incorrect statement you made now, it's impossible to confirm just how far out where the buses don't run you took it.
Looks like I'm not the only one twisting stuff, doesn't it?

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to popeye1250)

Profile

Post #: 47

RE: Liberal Hate Speech - 8/9/2010 12:18:32 PM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

Well here has been a whole thread of hate speech against liberals, maybe we should do one for the conservatives, so they don't feel irrelevant.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to Moonhead)

Profile

Post #: 48

RE: Liberal Hate Speech - 8/9/2010 12:38:42 PM

Jeffff

Posts: 12600
Joined: 7/7/2007
Status: offline

Haven't you heard?

We don't need any facts here anymore.

All we need are opinions.

We are now all equal because all opinions are equally valid.

I feel the warm glow of a socialist board.

_____________________________

"If you don't live it, it won't come out your horn." Charlie Parker

(in reply to Owner59)

Profile

Post #: 49