Elisabella
Posts: 3939
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: StrangerThan And, who puts the incumbent in office? That same public, who apparently, do not believe the issue at hand to be a spectacle. Just because it is to you, doesn't make it so to them. Go vote for your sensible incumbent. Leave their decision as to sensibilities, to them. It is why they have a representative. Your position, to them, is probably as idiotic and ill informed as you believe theirs to be. It isn't my place to decide for them, nor yours. It is supposedly reflective of the freedoms we have in America, that we can believe what we choose to believe regardless of whether another section of the country does or not. Either way, if incumbent is not representing his or her voters, incumbent should be looking for another job. It is, after all, why he or she is actually elected - or rather, that's supposed to be why he or she is elected. I don't think it's a politician's job to be a simple representative, I think they have a responsibility to lead as well. There's a tightrope to walk between winning the votes of certain segments of the population and using your office to better those people rather than wallow in the mud with them. IIRC it was the National Guard that desegregated schools in the Southern US, not the will of the people. Extreme rhetorical examples aside, I find it disturbing that you say that the past 20 years of politics have been more spectacle than substance, then go on to defend that by saying it's what the people want. On one level, I get what you're saying, the people do get to choose what they want to happen in the US. On another level? I find "the people's" desire for spectacle repulsive, I would say they deserve whatever they get except that Congressmen are able to vote on bills that affect the entire country, not just the idiots who elected them. No doubt it's a big nasty messy machine and it's absolutely foolish to think a democratic government could possibly be anything other than a reflection of the people, but it still bothers me that simply hearing the buzzword "socialist" is enough to influence the votes of people who probably can't explain what socialism is, much less why they're against it. It's blurry, but the sign says "keep the guvmint out of my medicare."
|