Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Is Obama's success the biggest threat to the Right?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Is Obama's success the biggest threat to the Right? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Is Obama's success the biggest threat to the Right? - 8/12/2010 3:03:04 PM   
Jeffff


Posts: 12600
Joined: 7/7/2007
Status: offline
Frankly it is because the Democrats pussed out. They buckled under the pressure of seeming "un patriotic"

The "press" such as it is , was no help either.

_____________________________

"If you don't live it, it won't come out your horn." Charlie Parker

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Is Obama's success the biggest threat to the Right? - 8/12/2010 3:04:19 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
Agreed.

Spines and any passion for doing one's job well were clearly missing in Congress and in the news room.

And any real demand that change was missing from the populace.








< Message edited by Musicmystery -- 8/12/2010 3:05:22 PM >

(in reply to Jeffff)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Is Obama's success the biggest threat to the Right? - 8/12/2010 3:06:40 PM   
Jeffff


Posts: 12600
Joined: 7/7/2007
Status: offline
And largely still is.

_____________________________

"If you don't live it, it won't come out your horn." Charlie Parker

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Is Obama's success the biggest threat to the Right? - 8/12/2010 3:09:00 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
Yeah, I was going to change the tense, then decided I didn't want to leave myself open.

Today's situation is a bit more complicated anyway. If with the same fundamental problems.

The news industry, though, is a lost cause. When reporting is just repeating what each other prints, gossip will do as well.



< Message edited by Musicmystery -- 8/12/2010 3:10:12 PM >

(in reply to Jeffff)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Is Obama's success the biggest threat to the Right? - 8/12/2010 6:38:33 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline
quote:

Is Obama's success the biggest threat to the Right?


Since what President Obama has been most succesful at is making the Republicans look not so bad anymore, I'd have to say the answer is no, Sambo.
quote:


I mean if your deep seated beliefs are that white folks are smarter than black folks


Interesting preemptive shot with the race card. Classy.

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to samboct)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Is Obama's success the biggest threat to the Right? - 8/12/2010 6:41:20 PM   
samboct


Posts: 1817
Joined: 1/17/2007
Status: offline
"Interesting preemptive shot with the race card. Classy."

You have a different interpretation of Sarah Palin at a rally referring to her audience as "Real Americans". What am I- chopped liver?

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Is Obama's success the biggest threat to the Right? - 8/12/2010 6:57:00 PM   
samboct


Posts: 1817
Joined: 1/17/2007
Status: offline
MMM and Jefff

Agree that Congress has largely fallen down on the job. In contrast to the media however, I do think that there is a lot of voter rage and impotence over the situation we find ourselves in. Look at the irresponsible folks who borrowed money to either purchase homes or took out home equity loans with the able and willing assistance of "professionals" to "help" them who are now effectively thumbing their noses at those bankers and saying no, I'm not gonna pay off the loan- what are you gonna do about it- to their rightfully aggrieved neighbors who have dutifully paid their mortgages on time and lived within a budget. We've turned into the biggest nation of scofflaws of all time- we're making Russia look like the straight and narrow.

On one hand, the Republicans set this up. On the other hand, the Democrats made sure that the bankers got away with it. I fully understand anybody who's pissed off at both parties. And Obama doesn't tap into this rage well at all. But I think his overly cerebral approach has also backfired, because there's nowhere near enough backlash and anger at the Republicans for getting us into this mess. You can either work with somebody, which is what Obama has tried to do and failed or you can just bash the other guys. Note that the blatantly absurd post about this administration lacking a bipartisan approach is simply ridiculous- just look at the health care bill- it's a REPUBLICAN BILL FOR CRISSAKES! Look at his bump up in spending on Afghanistan! Do you think that any liberal wants that? I think that Obama's biggest goof is that he hasn't tarred and feathered the Republicans with their misdeeds of the last three decades-whether it's a financial debacle, or a cleanup of the Gulf Coast from an oil spill when a few months previously, Republican supporters were chanting drill baby drill.

Harry Truman went on to greatness in my book, when he was sitting in really lousy shape for the '48 election- when he compared the Republicans to the fascist governments that had just been defeated. He was provoked to this by the rhetoric on the right- You can vote for a communist- or a Republican. Does any of this stuff sound familiar?


Sam

(in reply to samboct)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Is Obama's success the biggest threat to the Right? - 8/12/2010 9:12:11 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: samboct

"Interesting preemptive shot with the race card. Classy."

You have a different interpretation of Sarah Palin at a rally referring to her audience as "Real Americans". What am I- chopped liver?



So calling anyone who disagrees with President Obama's dumbass worldview, and half-assed major legislation, a racist is completely cool, but using traditional populist rhetoric is evil...

Right.

Got it.

Buh-bye.

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to samboct)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Is Obama's success the biggest threat to the Right? - 8/13/2010 5:57:51 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hippiekinkster

Well, anyone who thinks aspirin comes from a tree...

Well, yes and no. The active ingredient in aspirin is salicylic acid, which comes from Willow bark. Willow bark, usually in the form of a tea, as best I recall, was used for years to treat pain and fever. For some people, however, it was very irritating to the mouth and throat. A guy at Bayer worked on the problem and created a less irritating formulation, acetyl-salicylic acid, for which both humans and Willow trees have been ever-after thankful.

K.

(in reply to Hippiekinkster)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Is Obama's success the biggest threat to the Right? - 8/13/2010 6:11:45 AM   
Archer


Posts: 3207
Joined: 3/11/2005
Status: offline
A Republican Bill????????

Harry Ried wrote a Republican Bill???????????????

What the hell you been smoking to come up with the idea that it is a Republican Bill when it was made plain that no republican idea would be seriously considered when writing the bill. When Harry Ried behind closed doors wrote the Bill without even help from his own party to ensure that there were no leaks that the press  might get out information that drew public ire too early, that might shut down the bill.


(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Is Obama's success the biggest threat to the Right? - 8/13/2010 6:22:29 AM   
samboct


Posts: 1817
Joined: 1/17/2007
Status: offline
"So calling anyone who disagrees with President Obama's dumbass worldview, and half-assed major legislation, a racist is completely cool, but using traditional populist rhetoric is evil... "

Traditional populist rhetoric kept blacks as slaves, denied women the vote, and put Japanese Americans in concentration camps during WWII. If you're hearkening back to those days and pointing out that the opposition is a black guy, then yeah- it's racist and hate speech. Evil? YMMV.

Archer-

dude- do a little digging- you're sadly misinformed. The health care bill was modeled on the one written by Mitt Romney, Republican governor of Massachusetts.

Cheers,

Sam

(in reply to Archer)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Is Obama's success the biggest threat to the Right? - 8/13/2010 6:47:02 AM   
Archer


Posts: 3207
Joined: 3/11/2005
Status: offline
Sorry but the facts back my assersion that Ried D NV Majority leader of the Senate is credited with writting the Senate version of the Healthcare Bill.

"Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid unveiled a final compromise Saturday morning to the Senate health care bill that some progressive Democratic leaders, labor unions, and grassroots organizations said has been gutted of any meaningful consumer reforms and amounts to a bailout for the insurance industry. The language in Reid’s 383-page "manager's amendment" includes further concessions over abortion that were made in order to win the support of Sen. Ben Nelson, (D-Nebraska), who had said he would not vote for the bill if it did not include tighter restrictions prohibiting the use of federal funds for abortion."
http://www.truth-out.org/topstories/121809jl01

http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/tag/harry-reid/

http://reason.com/blog/2009/12/21/is-harry-reids-health-care-bil

Ried wrote the bill in private as an internal to the democrat party compromise, because up to that point he couldn't count on all 60 democrats to vote for a Healthcare Bill.

You're spinning it because the result mirrors the Massachusetts Law, History plainly shows that Ried wrote the compromise Bill in private away from even his own Senate colleges. Now what he wrote was seriously changed in the 60 days or so it was debated trying to get the 60 Democrat votes all lined up. the result was far less than what Ried wanted. But the Bill was written by Ried in private and unveiled to the Senate and the Public only after he had finished writing it.

a highly partisan article but wwhich includes the facts about how Harry Ried wrote the bill in private.
http://biggovernment.com/bdarling/2009/11/03/senator-harry-reids-hide-and-seek-obamacare-bill/





(in reply to samboct)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Is Obama's success the biggest threat to the Right? - 8/13/2010 7:17:33 AM   
VideoAdminSigma


Posts: 1016
Joined: 7/29/2008
Status: offline
There still seems to be some confusion on this. Let me be clear. All well and fine right up to the stick it up your ass part.

I would strongly advise anyone against ANYONE attacking the person instead of the content of the post in any disagreement in your views here.  I can assure you, that will be the last post you will be making for awhile, if not permanantly.

VideoAdminSigma. 

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Is Obama's success the biggest threat to the Right? - 8/13/2010 7:23:34 AM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
Still not sure what the Basiji means.


Probably some code-word to embarassing to say in public.

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to VideoAdminSigma)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Is Obama's success the biggest threat to the Right? - 8/13/2010 8:08:35 AM   
EbonyWood


Posts: 2044
Joined: 7/8/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Still not sure what the Basiji means.


Probably some code-word to embarassing to say in public.


Iranian militia. He was probably trying to be offensive as per usual.
 
If what the Moderator says is true, he will be banned as a constant and repeat offender. Let's hope they keep their word.

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Is Obama's success the biggest threat to the Right? - 8/13/2010 9:45:29 AM   
samboct


Posts: 1817
Joined: 1/17/2007
Status: offline
Hmm- Archer-

I'll certainly concede the point that Harry Reid tweaked the health care bill in private. But maybe we're arguing about semantics here. Harry Reid didn't write the entire bill out of whole cloth. Its widely acknowledged by people such as Howard Dean (who's also a physician) that the health care bill was based on Romney's model- especially when the Republicans were still contributing to it. I talked to him about it before it passed. His conclusion- that the bill wasn't great- it's his view that it was a Republican bill by the way- but that it would pass. I think he's right on both counts- the guy's not stupid. The bill was written that way to draw Republican votes- and as such, it's really not what liberals wanted. Politics is the art of compromise- sometimes you get something stronger, sometimes you get something more watered down. But in its fundamental philosophy- the health care bill should find a lot to appeal to Republicans, Harry Reid's tweaks notwithstanding.

What's angering me is the nuclear warfare- if the Republicans don't get everything they want- it's gridlock. Then they point the finger at the Democrats. When this neocon party dies finally, (tomorrow is not soon enough)- perhaps we can get back to having a working government for a change?



Sam

(in reply to Archer)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Is Obama's success the biggest threat to the Right? - 8/13/2010 11:59:14 AM   
THELADY


Posts: 116
Joined: 7/2/2004
Status: offline
what Archer said in spades, especially about Herman Cain. 


for those who think the 3.8 % tax is fictional I pulled this up from fact check ::


The truth is that only a tiny percentage of home sellers will pay the tax. First of all, only those with incomes over $200,000 a year ($250,000 for married couples filing jointly) will be subject to it. And even for those who have such high incomes, the tax still won’t apply to the first $250,000 on profits from the sale of a personal residence — or to the first $500,000 in the case of a married couple selling their home. We can understand how this misconception got started. The law itself is couched in highly technical language that only a qualified tax expert can fully grasp. (This provision begins on page 33 of the reconciliation bill that was passed and signed into law.) And it does say the tax falls on "net gain … attributable to the disposition of property." That would include the sale of a home. But the bill also says the tax falls only on that portion of any gain that is "taken into account in computing taxable income" under the existing tax code. And the fact is, the first $250,000 in profit on the sale of a primary residence (or $500,000 in the case of a married couple) is excluded from taxable income already. (That exclusion doesn’t apply to vacation homes or rental properties.) The Joint Committee on Taxation, the group of nonpartisan tax experts that Congress relies on to analyze tax proposals, underscores this in a footnote on page 139 of its report on the bill. The note states: "Gross income does not include … excluded gain from the sale of a principal residence." And just to be sure, we checked with William Ahern, director of policy and communications for the nonprofit, pro-business Tax Foundation. "Some home sales would see a tax increase under this bill," Ahern told us, "but it would have to be a second home or a principal residence generating [a gain of] more than $250,000 ($500,000 for a couple)." So there you have it. The sort of people who would have to pay the tax might include, for example:
  • A single executive making $210,000 a year who sells his $300,000 ski condo for a $50,000 profit. His tax on the sale of that vacation home would amount to $1,900, in addition to the capital gains tax he would have paid anyway.
  • An "empty nester" couple with combined income of over $250,000 a year who sell their $1 million primary residence to move to smaller quarters. If they cleared $600,000 on the sale, they would be taxed on $100,000 of the profit (the amount over the half-million-dollar exclusion). Their health care tax on the sale would amount to $3,800 over and above the usual capital gains levy.
finally if u think this is  for only a select few, so was the alternative minimum tax when they put that in a bill it was to cove a couple hundred people who had a loophole, now it covers most of the middle class.

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Is Obama's success the biggest threat to the Right? - 8/13/2010 12:10:58 PM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Archer
Sorry but the facts back my assersion that Ried D NV Majority leader of the Senate is credited with writting the Senate version of the Healthcare Bill.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Archer
Ried wrote the bill in private...


Oh, he did not have news people, watching him do it, so he must not have written the Senate version. Is that what you are trying to spin? You admit he wrote it in private.

But then, you went and found three sources, to 'back up' your arguements. Yeah, here's the following links to help explain this:

Just Hover Your Mouse Over These Links !!!!!!!

If your STILL having trouble, just look at the site names. I'm sure you will figure that out, without the hint, Archer. I just put that in there for the more....slow....conservatives on the forum.

The point is, sources should be from locations, that all parties can agree to the information presented. Back in the days before the Internet, Republicans and Democrats would argue over the same piece of information. Both taking it the opposite directions. Now, we have a trillion, useless sites, spewing out all sorts of crap. So, while a site to you might be 'legitimate and fair', it may not be for myself. And to be honest, a few people on these forums, Archer, have spoiled it for the rest of us.

For instance, I would accept something out of the Wall Street Journal's site, then Fox News; even though, both are very conservative publications. Why? The Wall Street Journal is credible, and have much to lose by lying to their readership. Fox News lies so often, now, that it is ingrained in their corporate culture. Fox News, could come out tommorow, and say President Obama, is getting a new skin color of 'neo-orange'. They just put up some photoshop'd pictures of what he looks like now (even though the surgery isn't done), and get a dozen 'experts' that are in the field of 'skin color change'. And how many conservatives, Archer, would believe them?

If that percentage doesn't scare you, nothing will.

Regardless of who crafted the bill originally, the point is, the bill was crafted and sent succesffully through Congress. Which is a feat in its own right, given conditions at the time.

(in reply to Archer)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Is Obama's success the biggest threat to the Right? - 8/13/2010 12:51:23 PM   
Archer


Posts: 3207
Joined: 3/11/2005
Status: offline
joether so a Left leaning site like Truth Out countered by a right leaning Heritage Foundation site is not balanced enough for you? (two of the three sources I cited)

The point is someone claimed it was a Republican Bill, which I was calling BS on because I caught the hyperbole of the statement. People on the left trying to make the law as passed seem to be closer to center than it in fact was. The passage of the bill regardless of how you feel about it was a piece of political arm twisting within the democrat party. The most amazing part was that it took the democrats so long to cobble together something they could agree to and pass. They had the solid filibuster proof majority for awhile there and still they barely made this Bill pass the Senate. The conditions at the time were what a Solid majority in the House and no chance it wouldn't pass and 60 Democrat super majority that could pass any law they wanted without a single Republican vote, and a Democrat President who handed the reigns over to the Congress and said write up the healthcare bill and send it to me.

Yeah tough to get a bill passed when you have the House Majority, The Senate majority (filibuster proof at 60 votes) and the President all behind the idea.








(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Is Obama's success the biggest threat to the Right? - 8/13/2010 2:51:34 PM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
For the OP's original discussion...

When it comes to the stilmulus bill, the Republican Party is very much on record for getting facts screwed up, then mixed in with opinions and out right lies. When the bill was first being pushed through, the GOP made a number of annoucements that such a thing was not needed. Of course, their lost to the Democratic Party was still fresh on people's mind, and so, most figured this was their way to 'lash out'. As we saw in the every election for a decade, the amount of misinformation being put in place of the facts, kept growing. Republicans pushed to the public, that the 'Spending Spree' was only for six months. That the USA, was spending something like $878 Billion, for six months. AND, it was all, (100%), being applied to the national debt. This was, I think, to hide from the public, the staggering amount of debt already on the books. Not that the Republican Party would ever lie, to cover something up.....

Well, six months came and went, and the money set aside for the Stilimulus Bill was not exhausted. So Republicans retooled their propaganda, to say, it was for one year. That's right, we are spending nearly a $1 trillion on Stimulus (yes, because $878 billion is 'close' to a trillion)! And that it was going towards 'the welfare', 'the poor', the 'illegal immigrants', and being used to promote a 'Socialist Agenda, to turn us in to communists'. Oh yes, I can't quite give it that 'Conservative Conspiracy' rant, like you conservatives can; I guess I'm just....sane. During this time, the Health Care Act was starting up. Republicans tried EVERYTHING in their power, to link, or make factual the following: Stilmulus + Health Care 'Reform' = Socialism. Unfortunately, that arguement, like the 'Trickle Down Theory of Economics' proved to be bogus and highly inaccurate.

After a year's time, but before those Census workers started, the economy was starting to look good again. Yes, it had its problems, but, things started to look better. The leading indicators were showing positive results. And at the time, the stimulus was doing exactly as designed. THEN....enter the Republicans. Oh, the GOP did not take a vacation from their conspiracies or out-right-lies. Oh no, they were spewing out more black garbage, then the pipe in the Gulf of Mexico. As their mentality is sad and deluded: If the USA Fails = The Economy Fails = Obama Fails = Republicans Win! That literally is the equation, I observe from Republicans. Every bill, every vote, every confirmation to fill a position (from the janitor on up), as been attacked, blocked, filibustered, stalled, or attack again and again. Some of them get through. But in the end, the GOP is the 'Party of No!'. Even on the health care, Republicans were trying to screw up ANYTHING, to make Mr. Obama look bad.

But then, isn't THAT the concept that got Republicans (and more importantly, our nation), in trouble in the first place: Being irresponsible? It is the role of the minority power, to always present the facts and information regarding the issue. They have everything to gain, from reporting facts and figures, that the majority in power, doesnt want made public. And that system has worked for the country for nearly a hundred years. Of course, that was working, until somewhere in the mid to late 1990's. Then the shift with the Republican party, from Good to Evil took place. Since then, the Republican Party has operated on the idea, that facts are the same as opinions: everyone has one. There is no real effort to distinquish facts from mindless crap. And conservatives, accept it all, verbatum, and without question. Its rather ironc to think about it. Here is a party, that bitchs, high and wide, about about our country becoming a 'Socialism', 'Communism' or even 'Facsism' (Kind of like this Movie...). And yet, they listen to only a narrow set of media sources (like one or two). Further still, those media sources put up 15 parts 'opinion' to every 1 part 'fact'. The end result? A group of people that are quite literally, controlled like a mindless ramble. Need an example?

Back during the final stages of the Health Care debate, the Tea Party held rallies across the nation, and as part of its 'Tea Party Express'. Those that went to it, brought signs to support the idea/rail against those 'evil, communists, marxists, socialists, nazis, (censored), (censored), (censored)' [***GASP FOR AIR**}], 'ignorant, stupid, hateful, twisted, (censored), mother-(censored), un-American, democrats'. Hell, my second attempt to do the 'Conservative Conspiracy' rant, and it just doesn't have that 'authentic' level of hatred that you conservatives do so well at. I just like this link, it helps explain it.

So....

In the time since losing to Democrats, the Office of the President, Congress (House and Senate), and two key (or is it just one?) US Supreme Court slots (not to mention a numerous other positions); what have the Republicans given to this country?

Thanks to Democrats,

There is someone looking out for small business owners, and average Americans. Mr. Obama took the money from the big bank bailouts, and put it towards smaller banks, to help remove the toxic assets on their books. Part of the money, as well as the profit off interest (yes, we actually made money off that venture, folks....dont look so surprised); applied it towards the SBA. That allowed the SBA to cover and grant loans, and to a higher amount, with a lower interest (both good things for a business). Since neither of these, really helped the Republicans, they were against both these projects.

Covering all US Citizens with a health plan. While it should have been better, I understand the reasons why Mr. Obama tried to include Republicans, in forming the bill. We were able to help 30 million Americans, and get those with a pre-existing condition (like AIDS, cancer, mental handicaps, etc), to get covered and treated. Unfortunately, Republicans, by and large, are quite selfish (whether they can admit it). Since the bill didn't help the Republicans, but did, Americans, they were against it.

The financial reform came about, due to the lessons we learned from the ecoomy in the last few years. Years of deregulation of the financial industry helped create alot of the problems have and are, experiencing. Without proper rules, and regulators in place, companies and individuals, were open to take actions that were once deemed illegal and unethical. SEC Civil Fraud Lawsuit, was one of the reasons, this reform had to be made. Otherwise, other financial bodies could do the same, with impunity. Since this would not help those who donate to the Republican Party, take a wild guess what the Republican party did on this bill?

Then we have the responders of the 9/11 tragedy. They wanted some help for what they did that day, regarding health problems. Now, WHICH party, tried to milk 9/11/2001 for every drop it was worth in the last decade? And so, it was surprising, to some, that the Republican party did not jump all over this; but instead, voted against it.

And all these measures have pasted.

The problem with Republicans, STRIKE THAT! One, of numerous, problems the Republicans have, is 'zero principle'. If Republicans were against something on principle, that could be accepted. It would define the party in manners that said, a group of people were adult enough to think for themselves. But as we have seen, in example after example, big and small, this is not the case. Instead, here is how I often observe the problem:

If the Democrats (or Mr. Obama), are for concept A, Republicans are for concept B.
If the Democrats (or Mr. Obama), are for concept B, Republicans are for concept A.
If the Democrats & Mr. Obama, try to take the best of A & B, while minimizing the problems of either A or B; Republicans are for concept C.

During health care, Republicans were asked point blankly "What would have to be on this bill, for you to vote FOR the bill?" And the Republicans, gave a few items, since not doing so, would have made them look like idiots. An so, the Democrats, begrundgingly, put those ideas in to the health care bill. And what happened? Not a single Republican, including the guys who voiced the concepts originally, voted 'For' the bill. The Party under cutted its own principle, and lost credibility. Ever since, Mr. Obama has tried to find what Republicans would want in a bill. He's given it, puts it in the bill: And Republicans vote against it. Sorry, after doing it a few times, the Republicans have now lost all credibility.

We had a problem over the spring and on to the present, regarding the oil industry. Just a 'small' problem, that was 'easily' dealt with, thanks to 'help' given by the Republican Party. When people looked through the history of laws regarding the oil industry; it was not surprising, which political party was always for deregulation: Republicans. The deregulations, seem to be the path that caused the string of events that allowed the actions on the rig, to take place. And did the Republican party feel we should do anything to help Americans effected by their irresponsible actions? Course not!

History seems to be the Republicans real Achille's Heel. Every time they do something stupid and bad, it bites America in the ass soon afterward. And now, thanks to them, we can add 'Torture' to what will happen to our soldiers, when they get captured in the next war. Yes, its understood, that out of every bunch of soldiers catch, a few are taken 'behind the shack' and beated for information. But, now, our soldiers can be beaten....for the bloody hell of it! Did Republicans take responsibility for allowing this practice to happen and contuine? Course not. Why hold Republicans accountable to their actions? Conservatives will just mindlessly vote for them in the next election anyways.

Why should we REALLY expect Republicans to do things FOR AMERICA? Out of their 'Good Hearts' and deep 'Acts of Charity and Humanity'? Because they have 'Knowledge', 'Compassionate', and 'Wisdom'? That they are for ALL Americans, and not just a few percentage points under 5%

Could any of you conservatives explain it to me? In detail please (that means longer then 10 actual sentences). Since, there is ALOT of reasons, not to hire Republicans back in to office, any time soon.

I think, if Republicans lost seats, in the next election, one of two things would actually happen (not that I expect this outcome): A) The Republican Party rethinks itself for 2012, and decides to clean up its crap, OR B) Become even more draconian, more hateful, more angry, and set the stage for ANOTHER, Act of Extremism!

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Is Obama's success the biggest threat to the Right? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125