Anchor Baby Terrorists

Anchor Baby Terrorists (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

jlf1961 -> Anchor Baby Terrorists (8/13/2010 6:15:46 PM)
Gohmert Continues to Push ‘Terror Babies’ Debate on 14th Amendment quote: Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Tex.) reasserted his claim last night that Al Qaeda may be sending women to the U.S. to birth a contingent of future terrorists credentialed with American passports. Gohmert argued with host Anderson Cooper, who asked him to provide proof to back up his claims about the phenomenon. He said “the evidence abounds” but failed to produce a source for his information, other than an anonymous former FBI agent. Gohmert Continues to Push ‘Terror Babies’ Debate on 14th Amendment There is also this interesting video of Rep. Gohmert arguing the point with CNN's Anderson Cooper. Video The fact that Anderson Cooper had a person to say there was no credible, tangible evidence that any terrorist group was sending women to the US to have children who are born as US citizens to be taken back and raised to be terrorists. And I have thought that some of the conspiracy theories posted in this forum were bizarre.

juliaoceania -> RE: Anchor Baby Terrorists (8/13/2010 6:42:54 PM)
This is fear mongering, plain and simple

jlf1961 -> RE: Anchor Baby Terrorists (8/13/2010 6:54:56 PM)
Well, it is one argument the conservative right is using to change the 14th amendment. I really have to ask, who came up with this bright idea dealing with paranoia as the main theme? I guess I should have expected this from Republicans.

Vendaval -> RE: Anchor Baby Terrorists (8/13/2010 8:28:59 PM)
Particularly poopy diapers are a form of domestic terrorism.

juliaoceania -> RE: Anchor Baby Terrorists (8/13/2010 8:30:22 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Vendaval Particularly poopy diapers are a form of domestic terrorism. Yes, but that is usually a homegrown sort of terror... I have experienced it in my home

Vendaval -> RE: Anchor Baby Terrorists (8/13/2010 8:31:42 PM)
Gives new meaning to "fire in the hole" and "bombs away"!

juliaoceania -> RE: Anchor Baby Terrorists (8/13/2010 8:53:50 PM)
I have seen diapers that made me think of napalm

EbonyWood -> RE: Anchor Baby Terrorists (8/13/2010 8:57:04 PM)
I am hoarding my sperm to take over the US at a later date.

juliaoceania -> RE: Anchor Baby Terrorists (8/13/2010 9:05:54 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: EbonyWood I am hoarding my sperm to take over the US at a later date. At least there would be millions of little EW's who were sane and articulate taking over. We could do worse.

joether -> RE: Anchor Baby Terrorists (8/13/2010 9:33:39 PM)
Yes, here are the names of four CONSERVATIVE terrorists, who were once 'terrorist babies': Timothy McVeigh & Terry Nichols - Oklahoma City Bombing Eric Robert Rudolph & Michael Bray - Abortion Clinic Bombers Maybe the conservatives can tell us, with perfect accuracy, which baby born, will be a terrorist, in 20-25 years? And while conservatives are doing that, please just email me through Cm, the winning Powerball numbers for the coming week. Thanks in advance! But, lets not have FACTS, EVIDENCE, and TRUTH, get in the way of conservative Republican's understanding of reality. I'm still for helping the conservatives change the 14th Amendment to a conservative view point.......IF.......They agree, liberals can change the 2nd Amendment to a liberal view point. Fair is fair, right? Any of you conservatives up to the deal?

EbonyWood -> RE: Anchor Baby Terrorists (8/13/2010 9:45:23 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: juliaoceania quote: ORIGINAL: EbonyWood I am hoarding my sperm to take over the US at a later date. At least there would be millions of little EW's who were sane and articulate taking over. We could do worse. Thanks for the vote of confidence. It may not be universal but your endorsement is especially satisfying. [:)]

tazzygirl -> RE: Anchor Baby Terrorists (8/13/2010 9:55:11 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: joether Yes, here are the names of four CONSERVATIVE terrorists, who were once 'terrorist babies': Timothy McVeigh & Terry Nichols - Oklahoma City Bombing Eric Robert Rudolph & Michael Bray - Abortion Clinic Bombers Maybe the conservatives can tell us, with perfect accuracy, which baby born, will be a terrorist, in 20-25 years? And while conservatives are doing that, please just email me through Cm, the winning Powerball numbers for the coming week. Thanks in advance! But, lets not have FACTS, EVIDENCE, and TRUTH, get in the way of conservative Republican's understanding of reality. I'm still for helping the conservatives change the 14th Amendment to a conservative view point.......IF.......They agree, liberals can change the 2nd Amendment to a liberal view point. Fair is fair, right? Any of you conservatives up to the deal? Never heard of a terror baby until now. And the thought is ludricous. Most use the system to ensure their little darlings can come and go in and out of the US at will, getting that "education" and that extra pay they seem to think comes along with it. a US passport makes traveling easier than most others. And just because im against all this doesnt mean im a conservative.

juliaoceania -> RE: Anchor Baby Terrorists (8/13/2010 10:02:25 PM)
quote: their little darlings Is this meant to be denigrating and sarcastic? Just curious

tazzygirl -> RE: Anchor Baby Terrorists (8/13/2010 10:04:39 PM)
Its meant however you wish to take it. [:D] We all know thats how you will take it anyways.

juliaoceania -> RE: Anchor Baby Terrorists (8/13/2010 10:07:10 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Its meant however you wish to take it. [:D] We all know thats how you will take it anyways. I was asking a serious question, your refusal to answer is... well, interesting

tazzygirl -> RE: Anchor Baby Terrorists (8/13/2010 10:11:03 PM)
julia, take it however you wish. i spoke no lies. i would assume any parent would consider their offspring their "little darlins". you are the one reading into things, as usual.

juliaoceania -> RE: Anchor Baby Terrorists (8/13/2010 10:23:36 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl julia, take it however you wish. i spoke no lies. i would assume any parent would consider their offspring their "little darlins". you are the one reading into things, as usual. I asked why you used that term, which is usually, in my experience with the English language, the way you speak about the parents of brats.... I did not assume that was what you meant, but it seemed an interesting way of phrasing it... I did not want to assume that is what you meant, so I asked.

DarlingSavage -> RE: Anchor Baby Terrorists (8/13/2010 10:26:01 PM)
quote: I'm still for helping the conservatives change the 14th Amendment to a conservative view point.......IF.......They agree, liberals can change the 2nd Amendment to a liberal view point. Fair is fair, right? Any of you conservatives up to the deal? I'm a liberal to the nth degree and I still think we need the second amendment. I don't even own a gun, but I think we need to reserve the right to bear arms. This was mainly to ensure that we would always be able to defend ourselves against those in power. Though, I certainly can see the other half of it, that some people that shouldn't have guns, do, but I don't think that gun control is going to stop that. On the other hand, how do we defend ourselves against a government that has nuclear weapons, among a myriad of many other tools of destruction? Still, though, I would like to take comfort in knowing that when my government is wrong, I have a right to stand up against it.

tazzygirl -> RE: Anchor Baby Terrorists (8/13/2010 10:26:44 PM)
Im known for saying exactly what i mean, julia. Your own article spoke about afluent visitors coming here for sometimes months to ensure their children have a US claim for education and travel. But its my term that you wish to jump all over. Perhaps you need to look in a mirror.

juliaoceania -> RE: Anchor Baby Terrorists (8/13/2010 10:28:06 PM)
quote: I'm a liberal to the nth degree and I still think we need the second amendment. Me too In fact I tend to think that any move to reduce the protection of people and their rights is a step backward in this country... we only did that once, with Prohibition, and that didn't last

Page: [1] 2 3 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875