RE: Personal Rant...not the first time....

RE: Personal Rant...not the first time.... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

juliaoceania -> RE: Personal Rant...not the first time.... (8/16/2010 11:08:48 AM)
quote: I was speaking more conceptually about those endless threads where women say they are repulsed by other women yet their Dom is making them do it to please them. Those threads bugged me.... what sort of person makes another do something that psychologically disturbs them because they think it is hot? I do not even understand how a man could get off on it knowing he was causing his submissive to be distraught. If I am recalling the same thread you are

BKSir -> RE: Personal Rant...not the first time.... (8/16/2010 11:08:51 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoiJen Ok. I'll comment on the rest when I finish working but what I wanted to ask is an "if x, they what?" kinda thing. quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact I really do know the difference between someone who moves to a same gender experience because it is something they may have wanted to do all along and somebody who has come to that place because they have reached that point in their submission. Ok using this as the means of defining "heteroflexible", what's it mean when D-types use the word? Obviously it's not about their submission. boi Damnit Jen, quit being so intelligent! You're going to turn me hetero-flexible... or bi, or whatever! ;) I just don't understand the need to label ones self in such a manner anyway. Why not, if heteroflexible, bi, metrosexual (I hate that term too), just say, "I like sex."? It's so much simpler, and covers the subject pretty darned well.

juliaoceania -> RE: Personal Rant...not the first time.... (8/16/2010 11:10:22 AM)
quote: Damnit Jen, quit being so intelligent! You're going to turn me hetero-flexible... or bi, or whatever! ;) I just don't understand the need to label ones self in such a manner anyway. Why not, if heteroflexible, bi, metrosexual (I hate that term too), just say, "I like sex."? It's so much simpler, and covers the subject pretty darned well. I would agree with this if she was not ranting out the other side of her mouth about protecting her own label

BKSir -> RE: Personal Rant...not the first time.... (8/16/2010 11:13:17 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: sexyred1 For me, I could have sex with a man or a woman but would not likely fall in love with a woman. So what does that make me? I would say that would make you "bi-sexual", in the technical meaning of the word. After all, "sexual" pertains, in my opinion, to the "sexual" aspect of the relationship. Just like if I were to fall in love with a female, I can pretty assuredly say that I wouldn't find her attractive, but I could still love her. Thus, I would still be "homosexual". And thus, that's the problem with labels as such. Right there in my second sentence. "in my opinion". You are what you are, what you say you are, who you feel you are inside, regardless of what others may label you as.

LadyPact -> RE: Personal Rant...not the first time.... (8/16/2010 11:15:09 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoiJen Ok. I'll comment on the rest when I finish working but what I wanted to ask is an "if x, they what?" kinda thing. quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact I really do know the difference between someone who moves to a same gender experience because it is something they may have wanted to do all along and somebody who has come to that place because they have reached that point in their submission. Ok using this as the means of defining "heteroflexible", what's it mean when D-types use the word? Obviously it's not about their submission. boi For the first question, you'll have to help Me out a bit. I'll be more than happy to discuss it with you. On the second, I can't help much. I'm as straight as I can be, so I don't have a situational reference.

sexyred1 -> RE: Personal Rant...not the first time.... (8/16/2010 11:19:12 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BKSir quote: ORIGINAL: sexyred1 For me, I could have sex with a man or a woman but would not likely fall in love with a woman. So what does that make me? I would say that would make you "bi-sexual", in the technical meaning of the word. After all, "sexual" pertains, in my opinion, to the "sexual" aspect of the relationship. Just like if I were to fall in love with a female, I can pretty assuredly say that I wouldn't find her attractive, but I could still love her. Thus, I would still be "homosexual". And thus, that's the problem with labels as such. Right there in my second sentence. "in my opinion". You are what you are, what you say you are, who you feel you are inside, regardless of what others may label you as. All true. Although, I would venture to say that if you fell in love with a female, but not find her attractive, you would not be "in love" but you could, of course just love her. To me, falling in love connotes some sort of sexual context that just simply loving someone, as a friend, does not. Again, it is all semantics, labels, etc and we all are what we are.

BKSir -> RE: Personal Rant...not the first time.... (8/16/2010 11:23:05 AM)
Possibly... although, at the same time, whilst in college I was very much in love with someone, and he was very much in love with me. And we loved eachother (because, yes, I do understand what you are saying about loving someone and being IN love with someone being two different things). However, we never had any physical relationship. I mean, we slept together, but, that's all we did, slept. So, would I, just based on that situation, say that he was bisexual or homosexual? Not really. Damned semantics. I still like to just go with "I'm me. Want a sammich?".

LadyHibiscus -> RE: Personal Rant...not the first time.... (8/16/2010 11:28:09 AM)
I really truly believe that romantic love does not need to be attached to sex, or consummated in any physical manner. I also believe that HAVING sex with a person of the same gender isn't enough to make you bi or gay. I have had sex with a woman. Pussy does not excite me. I adore women, I could turn my back on men forever (like, they could leave the planet) but I just have no sexual attraction for females. I can have two men entertain me by having sex with each other. Unless they would have the desire to do that WITHOUT Madam Hibbers telling them to? Not gay. I can go to church without being a Christian, too. Whatever happened to intention counting for something? ~~having an extracranky day on the internets, I guess!~~ ETA: Yes, BK, I would love a sammich!![:D]

sexyred1 -> RE: Personal Rant...not the first time.... (8/16/2010 11:28:26 AM)
LOL. Yes, I think we should all say that BKSir!! I say that because in every situation I have ever been in with a man who said I love you or I am in love with you and I asked if I loved them back, I could honestly say I loved the man, even if he was gay. However, I only ever could say I am IN LOVE with you, if I wanted to fuck his brains out as well. Now, where is that sammich? [;)]

DomKen -> RE: Personal Rant...not the first time.... (8/16/2010 11:36:32 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoiJen Second, are there REALLY folks who think that "bisexual" means being sexually attracted to ALL individuals of either sex? Just cuz you don't want to get it on with everyone of the same sex doesn't make someone "less gay"; same for being het. If a het male isn't attracted to ALL females, does that make him not "het"? "Conditional bisexuality" or "heteroflexible" is still a cop out. Justify it all you want but if you find yourself attracted to some individuals of either sex, you're bi. That's what the word means. The problem is that sexuality is not a set of discrete positions on a dial (homo, bi, hetero), its a continuum. There are people who are completely and exclusively attracted to members of one sex (true homo and hetero) and according to Kinsey and later studies this is actually fairly rare. The rest of the population has or has had different degrees of sexual attaction to members of each sex. Most of this group would reject the label bisexual as their sexual orientation is towards a single sex. Even amongst the group that would engage in sexual activity with either sex there are many who primarily identify as hetero or homo because that is their primary orientation. Just as you choose the term boi as a description of your gender identity a primarily straight person can identify as heteroflexible. Both terms transmit important information about the person.

BoiJen -> RE: Personal Rant...not the first time.... (8/16/2010 11:52:24 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen terms transmit important information about the person. This. Back to work... boi

Missokyst -> RE: Personal Rant...not the first time.... (8/16/2010 12:07:33 PM)
<g> All this makes me glad I am pathologically straight.

laurell3 -> RE: Personal Rant...not the first time.... (8/16/2010 3:04:40 PM)
quote: what sort of person makes another do something that psychologically disturbs them because they think it is hot? I do not even understand how a man could get off on it knowing he was causing his submissive to be distraught Sadists.................

Jeffff -> RE: Personal Rant...not the first time.... (8/16/2010 3:06:26 PM)
Yes?............ Oh..... nevermind.......

VioletGray -> RE: Personal Rant...not the first time.... (8/16/2010 3:09:54 PM)
I was pretty surprised to see the post that started this thread. I've been in the goth scene here since '94, and here at least, the term "boi" had always referred to an extremely effeminate male. http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Goth%20Boi It wasn't until very recently (last couple years or so?) that I've started to see the term "boi" by itself without "Goth" in front of it. are boi's strictly a lesbian phenomenon?

Rule -> RE: Personal Rant...not the first time.... (8/16/2010 3:10:34 PM)
FR What is the difference between a lesbian, a dyke and a boi? I wanna know.

LadyPact -> RE: Personal Rant...not the first time.... (8/16/2010 3:11:01 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: laurell3 quote: what sort of person makes another do something that psychologically disturbs them because they think it is hot? I do not even understand how a man could get off on it knowing he was causing his submissive to be distraught Sadists................. Not all of them male, either.

juliaoceania -> RE: Personal Rant...not the first time.... (8/16/2010 3:12:41 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: laurell3 quote: what sort of person makes another do something that psychologically disturbs them because they think it is hot? I do not even understand how a man could get off on it knowing he was causing his submissive to be distraught Sadists................. The thread I am speaking of was posted many years ago... it was a bit more than that, the submissive in question posted about this as though it would shatter her... it was very disturbing

BoiJen -> RE: Personal Rant...not the first time.... (8/16/2010 3:13:40 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Rule FR What is the difference between a lesbian, a dyke and a boi? I wanna know. Politics and how they fuck. boi

BoiJen -> RE: Personal Rant...not the first time.... (8/16/2010 3:16:29 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: VioletGray I was pretty surprised to see the post that started this thread. I've been in the goth scene here since '94, and here at least, the term "boi" had always referred to an extremely effeminate male. http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Goth%20Boi It wasn't until very recently (last couple years or so?) that I've started to see the term "boi" by itself without "Goth" in front of it. are boi's strictly a lesbian phenomenon? Dykes have been using the word as far back as the late 70's (so far as I can tell from the information I can find) as a push back against "extremist" lesbian feminism limiting sex to non-penetrative activities and an expression of "girl" power. boi

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875