RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS?

RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity

[Poll]

FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS?

FOR

83% (64)

AGAINST

16% (13)

Total Votes : 77

(last vote on : 8/31/2010 9:12:33 AM)
(Poll will run till: -- )

Message

LaTigresse -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/31/2010 7:10:36 AM)
[Awaiting Approval]

Saykiatric -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/31/2010 7:10:59 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam quote: ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist quote: troll shaped Pinata That is evil in such a good way. Trying to imagine the shape of a troll. I think it was donkey shaped at one time... but now it may be in the shape of a tiger. Well there you GO! a Tiger striped donkey doesn't everyone feel better now?

GreedyTop -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/31/2010 7:11:05 AM)
Counting..........but from what time zone?

BentUnit -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/31/2010 7:13:34 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Saykiatric quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam quote: ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist quote: troll shaped Pinata That is evil in such a good way. Trying to imagine the shape of a troll. OH THAT is a simple one its shaped like a Donkey. Pffttt.....it's the shape of a pasty skinned, middle aged fat man with pit stains, BO and a obvious comb over who has the handle of Saykiatric at CM.

Saykiatric -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/31/2010 7:13:59 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Mistletoe Guess we could try this....Troll Spray. [image]local://upfiles/1057370/9FAE2C2417B44A6388C6231C94E7AFE3.jpg[/image] Have you given the new Troll Dip works wonderful on whiners as well.

GreedyTop -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/31/2010 7:15:03 AM)
then why are you still here?

LanceHughes -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/31/2010 7:17:34 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BentUnit <shakes fist in Domi's general direction> You fucking little SHIT! VAA: Hate to say this since BentUnit is in my friends, but isn't that a clear TOS violation?

LadyPact -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/31/2010 7:21:59 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Saykiatric quote: YOU, sayko! quote: ORIGINAL: GreedyTop I have yet to see anything thought provoking from YOU, sayko! <~~TOS Violation I think a cannot be sure of course. I am emotionally traumatized that I was called yet another name!! I do not feel safe..where is my Moderator call button? It is like the big RED easy button from staples...I know it is around here somewhere. Thanks for proving the point twice. The word "you" is not a name. It's a pronoun. Someone pointing out that you don't provide the so called "thought provoking" topics that you claim (which in My observation also isn't the case) isn't a violation of TOS. In fact, TOS neither specifies that it will protect you from being "emotionally traumitized" nor does it guarantee your safety from common pronouns. quote: ORIGINAL: Saykiatric I have bee quiet about this for some time. I will set you straight..Without getting into the details on my end of how the discussion went between myself and Which people in the position to make the decision they have. This name you seem me using now is simply because I felt like changing it not from being "banned" I was reinstated under BlackLion and the name still very much belongs to me. So lets make this clear if you want to complain about what was agreed upon between myself and the powers that be on CM yes there was an agreement and I have held up my end however It was not tht I created a new name and reappeared I was gone far longer than my "time out" as I was bored with the pettiness quite frankly. So to make a long story short that is really non of your business when I was put on a 2 week "time out" I was informed that Blacklion was put on one also Tho I did nothing on that name nor have I used it for a very long time. So in this case you are wrong the Moderator I will not mention whom covered all bases wisely. Anything else you have or is that the only moan for now? This wasn't exactly news to Me. Several other members of the boards and Myself weren't fooled by the little name change and I pointed out who you were several times weeks ago. Why you weren't a big enough person to just come back under your original name isn't for Me to say. Maybe it was the disdain that other users had for you from the last go round or it could have been the <cough> inside <cough> jokes about you and the donkey. (BTW, innuendo isn't a TOS violation either.) There are too many potential reasons that are possible for Me to have a reason to believe one more than the other. We might just be different personality types. When I say something, I don't feel the need to hide behind a different screen name. By the way, that all bold thing is very difficult to read. I seem to recall not too long ago that the Mods asked someone else not to post in all bold. Since your thread is all about moderation, maybe the Mods will ask you to refrain from using all bold text.

LanceHughes -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/31/2010 7:22:15 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: VideoAdminAlpha This thread will be locked in about 2 hours....countdown time for those that didnt post. In my book, that's wise. BUT! Can we get approval on DG's AA post? You said "rest of the story." If no approval, I'll understand. I think mods are [put on Lawreence Welk voice] "wunnerful, just wunnerful." NO kiss-ass nor brown-nose - just the truth. << bold so color shows. LOL!

BentUnit -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/31/2010 7:22:30 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LanceHughes quote: ORIGINAL: BentUnit <shakes fist in Domi's general direction> You fucking little SHIT! VAA: Hate to say this since BentUnit is in my friends, but isn't that a clear TOS violation? You just want to see me stripped down, bent over and mod spanked! The line starts on the right and behind VAA. [;)]

Saykiatric -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/31/2010 7:24:10 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: VideoAdminAlpha quote: ORIGINAL: Saykiatric quote: ORIGINAL: switch2please ...you do realize the moderators are the only ones saving you from The Clique, don't you? You obviously do not realize I have not asked to be saved. unlike others ;) Sine you have apparently asked NOT to be saved, unlike others, as you can tell, you will not be. From now on. However, others will be, as they want to follow TOS, and want a sane board. See how that works? So please do not call a one way street as you seem to want a no holds barred attitude of responses to your posts, as long as YOU dont violate TOS. Im sure you will be able to tell the difference.Let me know if you change your mind. You will NEVER EVER see me whine to you about what someone says. I will point out the obvious taboos in fun but no I really do not care what others opinions are of me it is all in good fun in my opinion. I would have to have someone tell me whre you would to go even moan about another member to a Moderator. quite frankly really not all that interested in how as I have said wont ever hit the cry me a river button if there is a button. However thank you for giving me the option to change my mind. Good to see you bend to my preferences ;)

LanceHughes -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/31/2010 7:24:33 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: GreedyTop Counting..........but from what time zone? C'mon, GT. Doesn't matter, does it? No matter WHAT zone you're in.... you get two hours. ETA: Here, I'll do your work for you: Denver = 8:30 AM. Therefore, Florida = 10:30 AM. Add two hours.... string locks.... about 12:30 PM your local time.

Saykiatric -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/31/2010 7:27:34 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: VideoAdminAlpha quote: ORIGINAL: Saykiatric quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail That would be biased, first of all. Second, I would have to know your stand on icepicking people in the forehead for cause, before I can answer your questions. I WANT an Ice cream cone HOW are you doing THAT!!! It involves asking me NICELY, without sarcasm...........any more questions? Yes I have many question.......Are you prepared to answer them all in detail without hedging me how brave are you?

LadyPact -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/31/2010 7:32:42 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LanceHughes In my book, that's wise. BUT! Can we get approval on DG's AA post? You said "rest of the story." If no approval, I'll understand. I think mods are [put on Lawreence Welk voice] "wunnerful, just wunnerful." NO kiss-ass nor brown-nose - just the truth. << bold so color shows. LOL! Good Morning Lance. No issue there. The old eyes can see that and read it. LOL.

BentUnit -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/31/2010 7:32:47 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Saykiatric quote: ORIGINAL: VideoAdminAlpha quote: ORIGINAL: Saykiatric quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail That would be biased, first of all. Second, I would have to know your stand on icepicking people in the forehead for cause, before I can answer your questions. I WANT an Ice cream cone HOW are you doing THAT!!! It involves asking me NICELY, without sarcasm...........any more questions? Yes I have many question.......Are you prepared to answer them all in detail without hedging me how brave are you? Sorry but the above sentence doesn't make any sense. Please try again.

Saykiatric -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/31/2010 7:33:36 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: VideoAdminAlpha quote: ORIGINAL: Saykiatric quote: ORIGINAL: Icarys quote: ORIGINAL: Saykiatric How many feel that Moderators abuse the power given to them and are Bias against unpopular questions and opinions for example this Poll which may get pulled for even asking such a question. where as others regarding Moderators have not been pulled in fact the Moderators have joined in on the post. Who feels it is acceptable to put a two week or more waiting to be approved censor on an individual to protect the hyper sensitive from getting their feelings hurt. and While the individual is in "time out" as I have seen a Moderator put it. It is perfectly OK for the protected to taunt and make fun of the censored individual with no consequence. This should be a good one if it stands. You've got it a little easier..Trust me. When Mod11 was around..It was an all out war with her compared to the Mods around today. I understand your disdain for what you see as bias but they are okay in my book...I say this knowing I'll probably get moderated in the future. It's my destiny[:D] OH yes ModEleven and myself went back and forth for some time ended up spilling over into my email I do not miss her in the slightest.....I did loose count of how many threats I received I got word she was given the boot this pleases me greatly to hear true or not that possibly action was taken against one who was out of control. I Also just got wind that the Mods are all women that would be most odd. ModeratorEleven was not given the boot, she CHOSE to leave, and as to who the Mods are now, well, dont believe everything you hear, you would be WRONG. Well I am not getting into the he said she said however those who have informed me she was punted lets just say were not your average board posters thus you have just basically called your comrads liars. That is none of my concearn however. I do not make a point of being wrong When I throw something out here it is quite accurate. no Mod has taken it to my email and engaged me for days on end back and forth as eleven had....Tho it was entertaining it was in fact her conduct that in turned aided in my return. THAT is a fact.

DarkSteven -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/31/2010 7:36:51 AM)
[Awaiting Approval]

angelikaJ -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/31/2010 7:41:43 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LanceHughes quote: ORIGINAL: VideoAdminAlpha This thread will be locked in about 2 hours....countdown time for those that didnt post. In my book, that's wise. BUT! Can we get approval on DG's AA post? You said "rest of the story." If no approval, I'll understand. I think mods are [put on Lawreence Welk voice] "wunnerful, just wunnerful." NO kiss-ass nor brown-nose - just the truth. << bold so color shows. LOL! Lance, He is not under moderation. She gave the answer in another post: quote: ORIGINAL: VideoAdminAlpha He put that awaiting approval on there himself...he is free to post... (Bolded by moi)

FelineFae -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/31/2010 7:43:40 AM)
* psst * You only get to learn the true identities of the Mods once you are a 3rd Degree... We're willing to initiate those who fully seek the truth... Your journey will begin with this new one-size-fits-all jogging suit and this very tasty Kool-Aid.

ThatDaveGuy69 -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/31/2010 7:43:57 AM)
The mods are on a power trip. They prove it day-in and day-out. Like all the other BS here, it just goes with the territory. ~Dave

Page: << < prev 13 14 [15] 16 17 next > >>

Spam Policy

0.046875