RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS?

RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity

[Poll]

FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS?

FOR

83% (64)

AGAINST

16% (13)

Total Votes : 77

(last vote on : 8/31/2010 9:12:33 AM)
(Poll will run till: -- )

Message

VideoAdminAlpha -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/31/2010 9:10:03 AM)
Look for a cmail possibly later written between many cold showers so my fingers actually work......dear you could make a Lady type one handed, and I dont even DO that,,,,,,,[;)]

laurell3 -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/31/2010 9:10:23 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyHibiscus I know that you stopped posting a while ago, VAA, and you know that I miss your REAL postings! Under the current standards, she would have to moderate herself if she posted like she did then. This is not an insult at all but a compliment. The woman was the queen of thinly veiled snark and one of my first friends on CM. I miss her posts too. In fact, they would come in handy on oh....can we say...this OP's 30th bullshit whiney ass bitchfest?

GreedyTop -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/31/2010 9:11:09 AM)
HEY!! ya gonna share??? LOL

VideoAdminAlpha -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/31/2010 9:15:11 AM)
Ssssssshhhhhh, and anyway, the veiled was why I got away with it, thankies!!!! I like to think in the beginning before I had my fill of some posters "who may or may not have had the attributes of trolldom" I actually had some very serious, thoughtful posts. One can only want to play "whack a troll" for so long before has to figure out how to do it and not get in trouble or explode from not sayin anything...... disclaimer: the above actions seemingly designed to get around moderation are mythical and are not being claimed by Me to be effective.....just sayin......[;)]

LadyHibiscus -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/31/2010 9:15:22 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: laurell3 quote: ORIGINAL: LadyHibiscus I know that you stopped posting a while ago, VAA, and you know that I miss your REAL postings! Under the current standards, she would have to moderate herself if she posted like she did then. This is not an insult at all but a compliment. The woman was the queen of thinly veiled snark and one of my first friends on CM. I miss her posts too. In fact, they would come in handy on oh....can we say...this OP's 30th bullshit whiney ass bitchfest? HEY!! I can call her a ROLE MODEL!!! [sm=biggrin.gif][sm=biggrin.gif][sm=biggrin.gif][sm=biggrin.gif][sm=biggrin.gif]

BentUnit -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/31/2010 9:15:42 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: laurell3 quote: ORIGINAL: LadyHibiscus I know that you stopped posting a while ago, VAA, and you know that I miss your REAL postings! Under the current standards, she would have to moderate herself if she posted like she did then. This is not an insult at all but a compliment. The woman was the queen of thinly veiled snark and one of my first friends on CM. I miss her posts too. In fact, they would come in handy on oh....can we say...this OP's 30th bullshit whiney ass bitchfest? My Darling..I can only hope you enjoy my thinly veiled snark...and even when it is isn't so veiled. <sigh> I can only hope. <no one god damned understands me!..sniffle>

VideoAdminAlpha -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/31/2010 9:16:32 AM)
I assume that means you are in the line too?????[;)] If so, YUP, but dont need to put my secret methods down here, [:)]

GreedyTop -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/31/2010 9:17:18 AM)
I need to learn the thinly veiled thing.. I aint so good at that...

VideoAdminAlpha -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/31/2010 9:18:41 AM)
We have a wonderful search engine here if one knows what one is looking for.

BentUnit -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/31/2010 9:19:40 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: GreedyTop I need to learn the thinly veiled thing.. I aint so good at that... GT I am soo hearing ya there. I tries subtly ONCE and it gave me a massive fucking headache and I vowed never to try again.

angelikaJ -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/31/2010 9:20:15 AM)
To the OP Since you seem to have like-ability issues and furthermore seem to be baffled by same, let me give you some advice. How to be likeable: You could try not being antagonistic. You could try not deliberately provoking people and then playing the victim card. You could try being pleasant. You could try being polite and courteous. In other words, you could try behaving pretty much the opposite way of how you have been behaving both as your current handle and as your former. If you are unhappy with your present set of circumstances change them. If you are happy here...Great! Congrats! Mazel Tov! If not, the only variable you can change is yourself, and if you are powerless to do that, go to a meeting, call a pastor, priest, or shrink... why wallow in your own stink? You don't have to. You point out the perceived faults of everyone... when you have one finger pointed out, how many are pointed back at you? edit: omitted word

GreedyTop -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/31/2010 9:21:21 AM)
yay Angelika!!

Daddysredhead -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/31/2010 9:23:16 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: VideoAdminAlpha Ssssssshhhhhh, and anyway, the veiled was why I got away with it, thankies!!!! I like to think in the beginning before I had my fill of some posters "who may or may not have had the attributes of trolldom" I actually had some very serious, thoughtful posts. One can only want to play "whack a troll" for so long before has to figure out how to do it and not get in trouble or explode from not sayin anything...... disclaimer: the above actions seemingly designed to get around moderation are mythical and are not being claimed by Me to be effective.....just sayin......[;)] I find that saying "Bless your heart" kinda works, but I'm Southern like that. [;)]

laurell3 -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/31/2010 9:24:43 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: VideoAdminAlpha Ssssssshhhhhh, and anyway, the veiled was why I got away with it, thankies!!!! I like to think in the beginning before I had my fill of some posters "who may or may not have had the attributes of trolldom" I actually had some very serious, thoughtful posts. One can only want to play "whack a troll" for so long before has to figure out how to do it and not get in trouble or explode from not sayin anything...... disclaimer: the above actions seemingly designed to get around moderation are mythical and are not being claimed by Me to be effective.....just sayin......[;)] haha...maybe...maybe not...we weren't exactly prone to staying on whatever the ridiculous topic of the day was as I recall. I do remember cleaning my pc screen a few times because of you. One can only read some asshat pontificating about how if their slave won't die for them they're not true so many times before the shit hits the fan...just sayin....cough I mean back then....of course....

angelikaJ -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/31/2010 9:26:07 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: VideoAdminAlpha Ssssssshhhhhh, and anyway, the veiled was why I got away with it, thankies!!!! I like to think in the beginning I actually had some very serious, thoughtful posts. disclaimer: the above actions seemingly designed to get around moderation are mythical and are not being claimed by Me to be effective.....just sayin......[;)] You did post many a well thought post that I very much appreciated... (and I as well envied your finesse at deftly handling trolls back in the day)

BentUnit -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/31/2010 9:27:06 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: angelikaJ To the OP Since you seem to have like-ability issues and furthermore seem to be baffled by same, let me give you some advice. How to be likeable: You could try not being antagonistic. You could try not deliberately provoking people and then playing the victim card. You could try being pleasant. You could try being polite and courteous. In other words, you could try behaving pretty much the opposite way of how you have been behaving both as your current handle and as your former. If you are unhappy with your present set of circumstances change them. If you are happy here...Great! Congrats! Mazel Tov! If not, the only variable you can change is yourself, and if you are powerless to do that, go to a meeting, call a pastor, priest, or shrink... why wallow in your own stink? You don't have to. You point the perceived faults of everyone... when you have one finger pointed out, how many are pointed back at you? Baby, You're using rational logic on a creature who has no concept of the idea. What you are doing here, while heroic and noble, is the equivalent of pushing shit up-hill with a pointy stick.

LadyHibiscus -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/31/2010 9:27:08 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: laurell3 haha...maybe...maybe not...we weren't exactly prone to staying on whatever the ridiculous topic of the day was as I recall. I do remember cleaning my pc screen a few times because of you. One can only read some asshat pontificating about how if their slave won't die for them they're not true so many times before the shit hits the fan...just sayin....cough I mean back then....of course.... Good times! [:D]

SorceressJ -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/31/2010 9:28:50 AM)
VAA: there where should we put Your "secret methods", hmm? waggles an eyebrow I have nothing else to say to the OP, and strongly recommend that he refrain from posting in my inbox like he did last summer when I disagreed with him, when he was blacklion.

SorceressJ -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/31/2010 9:30:47 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: angelikaJ To the OP Since you seem to have like-ability issues and furthermore seem to be baffled by same, let me give you some advice. How to be likeable: You could try not being antagonistic. You could try not deliberately provoking people and then playing the victim card. You could try being pleasant. You could try being polite and courteous. In other words, you could try behaving pretty much the opposite way of how you have been behaving both as your current handle and as your former. If you are unhappy with your present set of circumstances change them. If you are happy here...Great! Congrats! Mazel Tov! If not, the only variable you can change is yourself, and if you are powerless to do that, go to a meeting, call a pastor, priest, or shrink... why wallow in your own stink? You don't have to. You point out the perceived faults of everyone... when you have one finger pointed out, how many are pointed back at you? edit: omitted word {{{THIS}}} Thank you, jellie..

LadyPact -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/31/2010 9:31:57 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: VideoAdminAlpha 1)You are NOT a newbie by your own statements. 2) Sarcasm is not your strong suit,even though you think it is. 3) Trim your fuckin quotes..........or I will trim them for you.....please. Polite enough? As another member who does her best to stay within that 'thinly veiled' dance with TOS (I highly doubt there are many who are unaware of that) I have a quick question for verification. Since the name calling subject has come up so often, is it still name calling if it's true? Just a random example to help illustrate. Let's say someone creates a thread and during the course of that thread, it's proven that he's a liar. Is it acceptable to call that person a liar? Why would that be different than any other description with another interchangeable term. One for Myself, perhaps, such as Domme. Where does the line get drawn? Let's say someone is proven a liar. Can we add adjectives such as untrustworthy liar or pathetic liar? Can we change the term to useless and untrustworthy if someone is a known liar? Of course, most people have some self respect and wouldn't want to be caught lying in the first place and would never say something that would cause someone to accuse them of having so little worth in character, but what would happen if we had an OP that had so little integrity? Is that acceptable?

Page: << < prev 15 16 17 [18] 19 next > >>

Spam Policy

0.046875