LadyPact -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 1:00:26 PM)
|
A few disclaimers first. I did not answer the poll because it is too vague. Unlike what some have assumed, I am not a Moderator. I think there are some folks here who are very glad that I am not. I'm very middle of the road about the Moderation. I couldn't do the job Myself because, in My own admission, I would absolutely be biased. I have a preference for those on the site who are involved in wiitwd and a lot less tolerance for the folks who haven't got any common sense. This goes along very much with My style of Domination that is very obedience oriented. I figure, people on the site were already given instructions on how to behave. They really shouldn't have to be told twice. Folks can say what they will about past Moderation. I didn't see it as unfair. That includes the numerous love notes with a gold boarder that I received for Myself. Quite frankly, this OP reminds Me of the concept of a submissive testing a Dominant (which VAA is, to the best of My knowledge) to see how far the Dominant can be pushed for the submissive to receive a punishment. It's quite manipulative, and at this point, there is a clear no-win situation. Either the Moderators will continue to allow the foot stomping and tantrums to continue, or they will Moderate so the OP can say "told ya so, Mods are biased". If it were Me, I'd be more than willing to accept the outcome of the latter. Unless I'm mistaken, the Mods really are members of the site just like anyone else. They shouldn't be permitted to be attacked.
|
|
|
|