RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity

[Poll]

FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS?


FOR
  83% (64)
AGAINST
  16% (13)


Total Votes : 77
(last vote on : 8/31/2010 9:12:33 AM)
(Poll will run till: -- )


Message


Saykiatric -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 1:15:44 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SylvereApLeanan


quote:

ORIGINAL: GreedyTop

The current Mods ROCK.  They are WAY more forgiving than some of the past mods.   If you find yourself at odds with the mods, then perhaps you should take a reality check of YOUR behaviour....


Quoted for truth.

Well will you learn shoulding on people is in poor taste. You "should" be more considerate to me desires! You have the wrong way and my way.




Jeffff -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 1:17:11 PM)

I would make a bad mod for the opposite reason. I would let almost EVERYTHING fly.

Many folks would still get notes telling them what I thought of them though.

If anyone here ever gets a note saying, " stupid post, but I will let it stand. douche""

You will know I am a mod.




Saykiatric -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 1:19:47 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: switch2please

The only campfire song I know is "Take Your Finger Outta My Ass Because I'm Leavin' You Behind..."

Wait. That's country. Sorry. [:)]  (Robin Williams; I can't take credit for that)


My Bunny Lies Over My Doggy(sung to the tune of "My Bonnie Lies Over the Ocean")

My pets were out practicing football.
My frog intercepted a pass.
My cat and my dog and my bunny
then tackled him flat on the grass.

My bunny lies over my doggy.
My doggie's on top of my cat.
My kitty is over my froggy,
and that's why my froggy is flat.

CHORUS
Green splat. Green splat.
Oh, that's why my froggy is flat, like that.
Green splat. Green splat.
Oh, that's why my froggy is flat.

My froggy's as flat as a pancake.
A paper-thin froggy's the worst.
He cannot eat flies now for dinner
except when I flatten them first.

CHORUS

If you see your pets playing football,
it's best if you bring them inside
or you may end up with a froggy
who's flattened and seven feet wide.





Saykiatric -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 1:21:56 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

A few disclaimers first.

I did not answer the poll because it is too vague.

Unlike what some have assumed, I am not a Moderator.

I think there are some folks here who are very glad that I am not.

I'm very middle of the road about the Moderation.  I couldn't do the job Myself because, in My own admission, I would absolutely be biased.  I have a preference for those on the site who are involved in wiitwd and a lot less tolerance for the folks who haven't got any common sense.  This goes along very much with My style of Domination that is very obedience oriented.  I figure, people on the site were already given instructions on how to behave.  They really shouldn't have to be told twice. 

Folks can say what they will about past Moderation.  I didn't see it as unfair.  That includes the numerous love notes with a gold boarder that I received for Myself.

Quite frankly, this OP reminds Me of the concept of a submissive testing a Dominant (which VAA is, to the best of My knowledge) to see how far the Dominant can be pushed for the submissive to receive a punishment.  It's quite manipulative, and at this point, there is a clear no-win situation.  Either the Moderators will continue to allow the foot stomping and tantrums to continue, or they will Moderate so the OP can say "told ya so, Mods are biased".  If it were Me, I'd be more than willing to accept the outcome of the latter.  Unless I'm mistaken, the Mods really are members of the site just like anyone else.  They shouldn't be permitted to be attacked.


I never thought you were a Moderator your ego is to over inflated.




Saykiatric -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 1:27:08 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

A few disclaimers first.

I did not answer the poll because it is too vague.

Unlike what some have assumed, I am not a Moderator.

I think there are some folks here who are very glad that I am not.

I'm very middle of the road about the Moderation.  I couldn't do the job Myself because, in My own admission, I would absolutely be biased.  I have a preference for those on the site who are involved in wiitwd and a lot less tolerance for the folks who haven't got any common sense.  This goes along very much with My style of Domination that is very obedience oriented.  I figure, people on the site were already given instructions on how to behave.  They really shouldn't have to be told twice. 

Folks can say what they will about past Moderation.  I didn't see it as unfair.  That includes the numerous love notes with a gold boarder that I received for Myself.

Quite frankly, this OP reminds Me of the concept of a submissive testing a Dominant (which VAA is, to the best of My knowledge) to see how far the Dominant can be pushed for the submissive to receive a punishment.  It's quite manipulative, and at this point, there is a clear no-win situation.  Either the Moderators will continue to allow the foot stomping and tantrums to continue, or they will Moderate so the OP can say "told ya so, Mods are biased".  If it were Me, I'd be more than willing to accept the outcome of the latter.  Unless I'm mistaken, the Mods really are members of the site just like anyone else.  They shouldn't be permitted to be attacked.


Show me where anyone  has attacked anyone. oh great woman of wisdom.




Saykiatric -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 1:29:48 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

In my case, the mods treated me rather fairly. TOS is clear, I was/am clearly a violator.

Others might have a different opinion.

At the end of the day I take some comfort in knowing I am not an asshole.

No you have earned your full ass credits come join my full ass club ~Jacks~




Jeffff -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 1:33:47 PM)

Dude, you realy aren't good enough to play with me.

It would be to easy and no fun at all.

I certainly hope your experience here at CM greatly improves.





dcnovice -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 1:35:31 PM)

quote:

You forgot the option that says that the mods are too lenient.


I was thinking that too.




SubPet715 -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 1:41:26 PM)

Bold black text, consecutive postings...I didn't want to let it be known but I mod about 4 high traffic forums none having to do with kink but all having about 10 times as more trolls, junk threads, reposts, zombie threads, and general jackassery and as a mod i'm no where near as lenient as the mods have been to let this continue. I don't believe in that sort of freedom on the forums I mod because the children online can't learn to play nice, they need to be ruled and live in constant fear of the ban hammer.

Your type comes just before actual threats and messages saying that you can beat up people in real life.

Thats what I have to say about that.

/Thread




LaTigresse -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 1:44:10 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

You forgot the option that says that the mods are too lenient.


I was thinking that too.


Pffffffttttt, those are just the whiny, overly SENSITIVE, pussies!!!




WinsomeDefiance -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 1:44:25 PM)

I voted for moderation.

The only reason I bothered with the poll at all, is I think that the moderators need to know that they have support. Moderating is, for the most part, a thankless job. It is my opinion that anyone volunteering their time to work on a forum must have a genuine care for the site to take on the task, else why would they bother? There's no pay, no perks, no real reason to do so other than a personal belief that one is doing their part to support something they believe in. Someone dedicated enough to overlook the slights, bitching, complaints and general lack of appreciation, and continue to do a thankless job, while doing their best to enforce rules to the best of their ability, has earned my vote.

Finally, I'm glad there are some boundaries in place preventing me from voicing my opinion about certain individuals. I'd very likely take entirely too much delight in doing so in the moment, but regret it later, so I'm thankful there's boundaries that help me avoid that entire unpleasant moral angst.





GreedyTop -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 1:45:28 PM)

Jeffff.. youre just a fluffy anteater.. admit it ;)




Saykiatric -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 1:46:37 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SubPet715

Bold black text, consecutive postings...I didn't want to let it be known but I mod about 4 high traffic forums none having to do with kink but all having about 10 times as more trolls, junk threads, reposts, zombie threads, and general jackassery and as a mod i'm no where near as lenient as the mods have been to let this continue. I don't believe in that sort of freedom on the forums I mod because the children online can't learn to play nice, they need to be ruled and live in constant fear of the ban hammer.

Your type comes just before actual threats and messages saying that you can beat up people in real life.

Thats what I have to say about that.

/Thread

For the love of .......GIVE me that soap box! and the hair brush mic as well....do they know you are out of your cell again?




OttersSwim -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 1:49:27 PM)

Topics like this are pure mental masturbation...




[image]local://upfiles/667175/82993AC37573452E82B508C730F890F5.jpg[/image]




SubPet715 -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 1:51:31 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Saykiatric

quote:

ORIGINAL: SubPet715

Bold black text, consecutive postings...I didn't want to let it be known but I mod about 4 high traffic forums none having to do with kink but all having about 10 times as more trolls, junk threads, reposts, zombie threads, and general jackassery and as a mod i'm no where near as lenient as the mods have been to let this continue. I don't believe in that sort of freedom on the forums I mod because the children online can't learn to play nice, they need to be ruled and live in constant fear of the ban hammer.

Your type comes just before actual threats and messages saying that you can beat up people in real life.

Thats what I have to say about that.

/Thread

For the love of .......GIVE me that soap box! and the hair brush mic as well....do they know you are out of your cell again?



Hmm...gonna let someone else say something now...




Saykiatric -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 1:51:47 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance

I voted for moderation.

The only reason I bothered with the poll at all, is I think that the moderators need to know that they have support. Moderating is, for the most part, a thankless job. It is my opinion that anyone volunteering their time to work on a forum must have a genuine care for the site to take on the task, else why would they bother? There's no pay, no perks, no real reason to do so other than a personal belief that one is doing their part to support something they believe in. Someone dedicated enough to overlook the slights, bitching, complaints and general lack of appreciation, and continue to do a thankless job, while doing their best to enforce rules to the best of their ability, has earned my vote.

Finally, I'm glad there are some boundaries in place preventing me from voicing my opinion about certain individuals. I'd very likely take entirely too much delight in doing so in the moment, but regret it later, so I'm thankful there's boundaries that help me avoid that entire unpleasant moral angst.



You at least got one part right. RAVE ON!!




Icarys -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 1:55:48 PM)

Is that you Myles? lol




Icarys -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 1:58:14 PM)

quote:

I never thought you were a Moderator your ego is to over inflated.

If it was true (Which I believe it may be) she won't be able to see it.[:D]




LadyPact -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 2:00:15 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Saykiatric
I never thought you were a Moderator your ego is to over inflated.


Actually, there are people on this thread who have said on other threads that they thought I was a Mod.  They can reveal themselves if they like.
quote:

ORIGINAL: Saykiatric
Show me where anyone  has attacked anyone. oh great woman of wisdom.


Thank you for appreciating My wisdom. 

Just because some of your posts have been pulled, doesn't mean they never existed.




LadyPact -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 2:02:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Icarys
If it was true (Which I believe it may be) she won't be able to see it.[:D]


An overinflated ego would be one who can not accomplish those things which a person professes that they can do.  When that happens, I'm sure you will let Me know.  [8D]




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875