RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS?

RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity

[Poll]

FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS?

FOR

83% (64)

AGAINST

16% (13)

Total Votes : 77

(last vote on : 8/31/2010 9:12:33 AM)
(Poll will run till: -- )

Message

LaTigresse -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 2:59:13 PM)
Well that was too simple. I was hoping for something more.........colourful. Mehhhh. Blazing Bossy Bitches!!!! Now THAT would be worth it.

Icarys -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 2:59:47 PM)
quote: Perhaps you are just not used to women who refuse to make their abilities seem less. Nope..Just not impressed with those who feel the need to express how great they are. Here's an example...We were all joking on this other thread and you wrote this. You felt the need to add the children thing in where it was conversationally inappropriate. This fed your ego. You wanted everyone to know you gave up drinking milk so your kids wouldn't go without..Very noble except for the fact that you were driven to post it by your ego to garner the attention for the noble deed. Ummmmmm......... Yeah. I actually don't drink milk. I'm not lactose intolerant. I use it for cooking and such, but I got it in My head years ago that I didn't need it because My children did. I've just never broken the habit.

Saykiatric -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 3:01:20 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Jeffff Better Business Bureau. I'll be CM gets a bad rating from him. I hope he doesn't know Dunn & Bradstreet HA! OW you made me snort water out my nose!

angelikaJ -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 3:01:29 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Icarys quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact quote: ORIGINAL: Icarys Anyone can say that..It's the internet. I come with My own references. When the person that you are married to goes to the same events that you do, it's pretty easy. Or, you could believe the pictures. Or, you could read the positive experiences of the people who have met Me. Or have attended the demos. You give Me far too much credit if you think I've orchestrated all of that. [:D] Oh no...I don't think your making up your life experiences. I think your over-inflating the importance of it and your role in it. I don't think you have the confidence you tell yourself and others that you do. I'm not saying your a bad person at all...I might be more apt once I got to know you..To trust you over most here...I just think your a bit of a blowhard. That's all. Just for you Icarys: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFYBLwb3I84

CalifChick -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 3:03:40 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BentUnit I think we should run a book on when this irritant gets placed in [awaiting approval]. It's 3pm Pacific Time right now. I would like the 6pm to 7pm time slot please. Cali

Icarys -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 3:03:55 PM)
quote: Just for you Icarys: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFYBLwb3I84 I'm not a big fan of Elton but thanks. Your too kind[:D]

LadyPact -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 3:05:46 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Icarys quote: Perhaps you are just not used to women who refuse to make their abilities seem less. Nope..Just not impressed with those who feel the need to express how great they are. Here's an example...We were all joking on this other thread and you wrote this. You felt the need to add the children thing in where it was conversationally inappropriate. This fed your ego. You wanted everyone to know you gave up drinking milk so your kids wouldn't go without..Very noble except for the fact that you were driven to post it by your ego to garner the attention for the noble deed. Ummmmmm......... Yeah. I actually don't drink milk. I'm not lactose intolerant. I use it for cooking and such, but I got it in My head years ago that I didn't need it because My children did. I've just never broken the habit. Just because people are joking, doesn't mean that a person shouldn't tell the truth. The mentioning of why wasn't inappropriate, since My children today happen to be adults. Neither of them lives at home, but I still have the same habit. ETA - BTW, I don't eat most fruit, either. That's just preference. [:)]

Saykiatric -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 3:07:25 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Icarys quote: Perhaps you are just not used to women who refuse to make their abilities seem less. Nope..Just not impressed with those who feel the need to express how great they are. Here's an example...We were all joking on this other thread and you wrote this. You felt the need to add the children thing in where it was conversationally inappropriate. This fed your ego. You wanted everyone to know you gave up drinking milk so your kids wouldn't go without..Very noble except for the fact that you were driven to post it by your ego to garner the attention for the noble deed. Ummmmmm......... Yeah. I actually don't drink milk. I'm not lactose intolerant. I use it for cooking and such, but I got it in My head years ago that I didn't need it because My children did. I've just never broken the habit. It has been proven now that milk is not required for children you can put the cows back in the barn.

Icarys -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 3:09:07 PM)
quote: Just because people are joking, doesn't mean that a person shouldn't tell the truth. The mentioning of why wasn't inappropriate, since My children today happen to be adults. Neither of them lives at home, but I still have the same habit. I meant contextually inappropriate in the conversation...not TOS inappropriate. Just saying.

LaTigresse -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 3:09:41 PM)
I, on the other hand, eat A LOT of fruit. In fact, I just ate wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyy too much watermelon. That means I ............have to go now. Tataaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!

Saykiatric -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 3:10:08 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CalifChick quote: ORIGINAL: BentUnit I think we should run a book on when this irritant gets placed in [awaiting approval]. It's 3pm Pacific Time right now. I would like the 6pm to 7pm time slot please. Cali Let her wish be granted that she be put in time out somewhere between 6 pm and 7 pm for two weeks who would be so cruel as to deny this masochist her request?

Icarys -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 3:10:22 PM)
quote: ETA - BTW, I don't eat most fruit, either. That's just preference. You mean you didn't give that up for your kids as well? Yes your a wonderful mother.

mnottertail -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 3:10:54 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LaTigresse I, on the other hand, eat A LOT of fruit. In fact, I just ate wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyy too much watermelon. That means I ............have to go now. Tataaaaaaaaa!!!!!!! You; in fact, ARE a fruit, n'est ce pas?

WinsomeDefiance -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 3:11:20 PM)
Speaking of fruits....shouldn't we get back on topic and stop derailing the OP's thread.

Icarys -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 3:11:51 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LaTigresse I, on the other hand, eat A LOT of fruit. In fact, I just ate wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyy too much watermelon. That means I ............have to go now. Tataaaaaaaaa!!!!!!! One more thing we have in common. Weeeeeee. (love watermelon I mean)

BentUnit -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 3:11:52 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CalifChick quote: ORIGINAL: BentUnit I think we should run a book on when this irritant gets placed in [awaiting approval]. It's 3pm Pacific Time right now. I would like the 6pm to 7pm time slot please. Cali Sure thing CC. It'll be interesting to see who calls it correctly. [;)]

rulemylife -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 3:13:45 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance Speaking of fruits....shouldn't we get back on topic and stop derailing the OP's thread. Where's a moderator when you need one?

LadyPact -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 3:13:53 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Icarys I meant contextually inappropriate in the conversation...not TOS inappropriate. Just saying. Considering the conversation evolved to 'pro' certain foods, I happen to think that it was.

Icarys -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 3:14:36 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact quote: ORIGINAL: Icarys I meant contextually inappropriate in the conversation...not TOS inappropriate. Just saying. Considering the conversation evolved to 'pro' certain foods, I happen to think that it was. That's your ego talking.

Icarys -> RE: FOR MODERATORS OR AGAINST MODERATORS? (8/30/2010 3:16:04 PM)
I'm off to print some of my wonderfully designed signs...BBL[:D]

Page: << < prev 4 5 [6] 7 8 next > >>

Spam Policy

0.0625