pahunkboy
Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006 From: Central Pennsylvania Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DCWoody quote:
ORIGINAL: popeye1250 quote:
ORIGINAL: DCWoody Ah, thought you were slating free trade, rather than a specific (IYO bad) treaty using the label as cover, my bad. D.C. that's part of the problem right from the start of it. It meets all five criteria of a "Treaty" according to State Dept. rules which requires a two thirds vote in the Senate! Yet, they called it an "agreement" to get it passed because they *knew* it couldn't get 67 votes in the Senate! But if you look at the face of it, it is in fact a "Treaty." Eh, I don't know much about it (although I recall hearing some Candians worried that american investors were gonna use tricky shit to purchase their groundwater), but I've always thought of it as a treaty. Didn't they do the same with Vietnam, declare it Police Assistance or something to avoid the war requirements? And recently there's been 'unlawful combatants' to avoid Geneva...mebe ya could get through some sort of amendment to stop them doing that sorta shit, Supreme Court could check it somehow? I dunno......anyways....Lucys assertion that it was signed before Clinton, does seem pretty damn bulletproof. Unless she's making shit up....that'd be like blaming Lisbon on Cameron. Actually.....yeah, I googled it, it was the work of, on the american side, Bush I, so your partisan shit fails in this case.... I did not sign that treaty. Corporations live forever- - humans do not.
|