Ann Coulter...whoops! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


thornhappy -> Ann Coulter...whoops! (9/18/2010 1:23:03 PM)

Recently a less-than-favorable article was written in Vanity Fair about Palin, and the author was Michael Joseph Gross.

Not Michael Gross.

Ann Coulter confused the two and Michael Gross's email box overflowed with joy.  Not.  He posted an open letter to her here, with examples of the email.  Here are 2:

This one is from SL ([address deleted]): “if you are the so called writer for vanity fair,this one’s for you! were you in Sarah’s bedroom,did you see whether her busband had sex with her….who are your so-called un-named sources and how many of them might have been peering through Sara’s bedroom windows…you’re peeping tom article is typical low life,new york jew smear….yes i am an anti semite,and those like you make my feelings all the clearer as to why”

And finally (for now, at least), a man who signed himself mb ([address deleted]): “You are one fucked-up piece of shit. I just read Ann Coulter’s article about your Vanity Fair Article and have have to say, she hit it bang on. You are a real, gooy-gash piece of garbage. You need to find something else to criticize Sarah Palin about. Something thaT HAS SIGNIFICANCE REGARDING THE LIVES OF THE aMERICAN pEOPLE, NOT THE RETARDS WHO STRUGGLE TO READ VANITY fAIR.”

Well, I'd be pissed too.




Lucylastic -> RE: Ann Coulter...whoops! (9/18/2010 1:40:10 PM)

sounds like some of the posters on this board....
now the thing is do I wanna see her hate mail
nah I dont think so





flcouple2009 -> RE: Ann Coulter...whoops! (9/18/2010 2:49:15 PM)

Those are some fine upstanding Tea Party members there.  The ones are right leaning friends here spend all of their time trying to convince everyone don't exist.




Moonhead -> RE: Ann Coulter...whoops! (9/18/2010 2:54:00 PM)

To be fair to the raddled sow, I think she made it clear long ago that this "research" nonsense is for stuck up leftist intellekchuls and no real American would have anythjing to do with such a degraded and vile business.




Sanity -> RE: Ann Coulter...whoops! (9/18/2010 7:18:23 PM)


Whats the point of this. Do you really think that left wing talkers dont generate hate mail towards their targets? Or are you upset that Ann didnt include the dweebs middle name? Or are you just jealous because Ann actually has an audience while no left wing talkers do. 

Here are the first few lines of the article in question, which placing your little rant in context makes it perfectly clear how shes driving you leftists mad:

quote:

LIKE, IS SARAH PALIN TOTALLY CONCEITED?

In the October issue of Vanity Fair now on newsstands, Michael Gross reverts to junior high school to issue gossip-girl digs at Sarah Palin. Next up in Vanity Fair: "Sarah Palin Super Stuck Up; Thinks She's All That."

Gross dramatically reveals, for example, that her speech in Wichita, Kan., was "basically the same speech she gave 18 hours earlier to the Tea Party group in Independence (Mo.)."

A politician repeated lines in a speech? You must be kidding! Hello, Ripley's? No, you cannot put me on hold. This is a worldwide exclusive. I'm sitting on a powder keg here.

Gross also apparently believes Vanity Fair readers will be tickled, rather than appalled by this story about Palin:

"Sometimes when she went out in public, people were unkind. Once, while shopping at Target, a man saw Palin and hollered, 'Oh my God! It's Tina Fey! I love Tina Fey!' When other shoppers started laughing, the governor parked her cart, walked out of the store, and drove away." (That jackass was lucky Sarah didn't have her moose rifle with her.)

A random encounter with a rude, abusive jerk in public is supposed to make her look bad? Liberals have really lost their minds about Palin. They'd laugh if someone hit her with a baseball bat.




quote:

ORIGINAL: thornhappy

Recently a less-than-favorable article was written in Vanity Fair about Palin, and the author was Michael Joseph Gross.

Not Michael Gross.

Ann Coulter confused the two and Michael Gross's email box overflowed with joy.  Not.  He posted an open letter to her here, with examples of the email.  Here are 2:

This one is from SL ([address deleted]): “if you are the so called writer for vanity fair,this one’s for you! were you in Sarah’s bedroom,did you see whether her busband had sex with her….who are your so-called un-named sources and how many of them might have been peering through Sara’s bedroom windows…you’re peeping tom article is typical low life,new york jew smear….yes i am an anti semite,and those like you make my feelings all the clearer as to why”

And finally (for now, at least), a man who signed himself mb ([address deleted]): “You are one fucked-up piece of shit. I just read Ann Coulter’s article about your Vanity Fair Article and have have to say, she hit it bang on. You are a real, gooy-gash piece of garbage. You need to find something else to criticize Sarah Palin about. Something thaT HAS SIGNIFICANCE REGARDING THE LIVES OF THE aMERICAN pEOPLE, NOT THE RETARDS WHO STRUGGLE TO READ VANITY fAIR.”

Well, I'd be pissed too.





Lucylastic -> RE: Ann Coulter...whoops! (9/18/2010 7:21:28 PM)

Did you like totally miss the point of the post, they are two different people?





Sanity -> RE: Ann Coulter...whoops! (9/18/2010 7:23:37 PM)


Its a mole hill because its the same name, and she named the publication he works for which is Vanity Fair.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Did you like totally miss the point of the post, they are two different people?






Lucylastic -> RE: Ann Coulter...whoops! (9/18/2010 7:25:03 PM)

please rectify your comment or I will make another one that you cant edit





Lucylastic -> RE: Ann Coulter...whoops! (9/18/2010 7:26:16 PM)

hahahah well done, you did





rulemylife -> RE: Ann Coulter...whoops! (9/18/2010 7:53:03 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Whats the point of this. Do you really think that left wing talkers dont generate hate mail towards their targets? Or are you upset that Ann didnt include the dweebs middle name? Or are you just jealous because Ann actually has an audience while no left wing talkers do. 

Here are the first few lines of the article in question, which placing your little rant in context makes it perfectly clear how shes driving you leftists mad:

quote:

LIKE, IS SARAH PALIN TOTALLY CONCEITED?

In the October issue of Vanity Fair now on newsstands, Michael Gross reverts to junior high school to issue gossip-girl digs at Sarah Palin. Next up in Vanity Fair: "Sarah Palin Super Stuck Up; Thinks She's All That."

Gross dramatically reveals, for example, that her speech in Wichita, Kan., was "basically the same speech she gave 18 hours earlier to the Tea Party group in Independence (Mo.)."

A politician repeated lines in a speech? You must be kidding! Hello, Ripley's? No, you cannot put me on hold. This is a worldwide exclusive. I'm sitting on a powder keg here.

Gross also apparently believes Vanity Fair readers will be tickled, rather than appalled by this story about Palin:

"Sometimes when she went out in public, people were unkind. Once, while shopping at Target, a man saw Palin and hollered, 'Oh my God! It's Tina Fey! I love Tina Fey!' When other shoppers started laughing, the governor parked her cart, walked out of the store, and drove away." (That jackass was lucky Sarah didn't have her moose rifle with her.)

A random encounter with a rude, abusive jerk in public is supposed to make her look bad? Liberals have really lost their minds about Palin. They'd laugh if someone hit her with a baseball bat.




Uh..............well..............the point of it seems to be that Princess Ann can't keep her facts in order any better than you, and that she named the wrong person.




rulemylife -> RE: Ann Coulter...whoops! (9/18/2010 7:54:51 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Its a mole hill because its the same name, and she named the publication he works for which is Vanity Fair.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Did you like totally miss the point of the post, they are two different people?





She is supposed to be a responsible journalist.  Right?






Sanity -> RE: Ann Coulter...whoops! (9/18/2010 8:08:16 PM)


Uh............ its the same name, brainiac. And again, she further identified who she was naming by citing the article she was critiquing.

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife
Uh..............well..............the point of it seems to be that Princess Ann can't keep her facts in order any better than you, and that she named the wrong person.





Sanity -> RE: Ann Coulter...whoops! (9/18/2010 8:11:01 PM)


Nope.

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

She is supposed to be a responsible journalist.  Right?







rulemylife -> RE: Ann Coulter...whoops! (9/18/2010 8:17:20 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Uh............ its the same name, brainiac. And again, she further identified who she was naming by citing the article she was critiquing.

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife
Uh..............well..............the point of it seems to be that Princess Ann can't keep her facts in order any better than you, and that she named the wrong person.




Then why did so many intellectually gifted conservatives send hate mail to the wrong person?




rulemylife -> RE: Ann Coulter...whoops! (9/18/2010 8:19:00 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Nope.

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

She is supposed to be a responsible journalist.  Right?






Try not to strain yourself, but a little elaboration would be nice.




Sanity -> RE: Ann Coulter...whoops! (9/18/2010 8:23:14 PM)


I addressed that in post #5 above.

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

Then why did so many intellectually gifted conservatives send hate mail to the wrong person?





Sanity -> RE: Ann Coulter...whoops! (9/18/2010 8:27:43 PM)


Its a stupid question, youre probably the only one here who doesnt get that Ms Coulter has never represented herself as a journalist.


quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife
Try not to strain yourself, but a little elaboration would be nice.





rulemylife -> RE: Ann Coulter...whoops! (9/18/2010 8:30:31 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Its a stupid question, youre probably the only one here who doesnt get that Ms Coulter has never represented herself as a journalist.


quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife
Try not to strain yourself, but a little elaboration would be nice.




Then what is she?

Another "entertainer" like you claim El Fatass is?




Sanity -> RE: Ann Coulter...whoops! (9/18/2010 8:33:05 PM)


Who was your tutor this time last year?

Oh, right - that would have been me.

My, how time flies...

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife


Then what is she?

Another "entertainer" like you claim El Fatass is?





rulemylife -> RE: Ann Coulter...whoops! (9/18/2010 8:33:56 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


I addressed that in post #5 above.

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

Then why did so many intellectually gifted conservatives send hate mail to the wrong person?




And I disputed what you said in post #5 above.

So referring me back to the post I disputed does not resolve anything.




Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125