LadyNTrainer
Posts: 1584
Joined: 5/20/2009 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Kinkthulhu Well maybe I'm not looking in the right places, or maybe most "sub" males are just retarded. So I'll ask this... What do you Dommes consider a true submissive male? First of all, screen name love. I've run and played in a number of CoC campaigns, and geeky = sexy. Second, I find that when people prepend the term "true" to anything, unless it's in the field of hard science where there are mathematically precise definitions and measurements, mostly they're just going to cause a lot of confusion and maybe get into a pissing match about whose definition of "true" is better. Because frankly there are likely to be multiple definitions of what is "true", and not everyone is going to agree on what meets those criteria. I think that the absolute baselines that most people can agree on would be that a "true" submissive is not false or lying (eg, misrepresenting himself for some agenda of gain), and that he is also not an utterly selfish fetishist whose sole interest is in finding someone with tits and a whip who will cater to his exact fantasy without having inconvenient needs and desires and a human existence of her own. quote:
I don't consider a submissive to be someone just interested in fulfilling their personal fetish by having a woman in control of them. I consider myself submissive because it is my goal to please my partner by whatever means necessary. I want to love, protect, and please a woman, by dedicating myself to them. I am looking for someone that wants a man to fulfill her desires, in and out of the bedroom. Some one that wants an average guy that is fully capable of taking care of himself and is fully independent that is interested in dedicating himself to making his woman happy. Am I wrong? Or is that what a submissive male should be? Someone that isn't a just horny little man seeking his porno-educated fantasies but a level headed individual looking for a strong minded woman to focus his attention on. I'd be in complete agreement here, but I would probably not care to use the term "true", since it's just too damn broad and vague. Someone like yourself might in fact meet all those criteria, but might fall short of someone else's definition of "true" because he retains a few hard limits. There's this ideal that a "True" submissive would, for instance, allow their dominant to cut off their limbs with a chainsaw rather than state a hard limit. And that may well be applicable, but I think someone can be a perfectly good submissive and still draw the line at being treated very abusively or unsafely. And that's why I prefer to avoid the word "true" in this context; it usually just becomes a pissing match for people talking about extremes and doing it More Kinkier Than Thou.
_____________________________
Your dominant Personal Trainer for fitness and body shaping in the lifestyle. Let my fetish be your motivation.
|