lally2 -> RE: a hypothetical (10/2/2010 5:05:01 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyRian quote:
ORIGINAL: lally2 i know its hypothetical but its a thought prompted from another thread and the dozens or so similar to it that crop up from time to time. that a slave or submissive isnt 'true' if they have any sort of choice or option before any relationship even begins or has any right to end it. what if there were real auctions and we were sold like cattle - would we submit ourselves to that or would we pass, given as ive said, that we are here for the obvious reasons that Ds Ms and BDSM float us. if there was no other option open to us, would we still be here. and to the Dominants, would you prefer this to be the case, on some level - would you still be here. If this were the case, no. I'd be gone. The sub always has the right to choice, as far as I'm concerned. I don't find choice to be adverse to submission, far from it. I want one who's submission to me is by his own choice based on his well considered decision to do so. And in order to make that well considered decision, we'd need to get to know each other, see who we are, like who we are, and want to be together. A submissive who's a partner, and knows he's his own, strong person, is to me, the most attractive of all. A slave auction can be a hot fantasy, but if it were the ruling paradigm, I think I'd become an abolitionist. ... and this is the critical difference that makes this BDSM, Ds and Ms and nothing at all, whatsoever to do with the slave trade of unwilling and unwitting victims. the hot fantasy of an auction i think in reality would be a total lottery on both sides and in my opinion would prove itself to be unworkable (unless directed by Lady P of course [:)]) - it would go back to the good old days of 'frog kissing' eventually. ok, well i guess we keep going as we are then [:D]
|
|
|
|