RE: Pictures of "mooning" subs

RE: Pictures of "mooning" subs (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress

Message

CynthiaWVirginia -> RE: Pictures of "mooning" subs (10/11/2010 1:47:08 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyRian My opinion is this: If I want to see the full moon, I'll go outside at night. I don't want to see somebody's naked butt in an introduction.And sadly, it's usually the older dudes who seem to desire to exhibit themselves in this way. The gravity of the situation is obvious. Same with cock shots. This to me is tantamount to the skeezy guy lurking about in a stained trenchcoat ready to flash his weenie at any unsuspecting female passing by, only minus the coat. [sm=rofl.gif] Thank goodness I had finished my cherry juice before reading this.

Madame4a -> RE: Pictures of "mooning" subs (10/11/2010 5:20:12 PM)
FR Love it.. huge time saver... makes me pass right on by

Arben1954 -> RE: Pictures of "mooning" subs (10/12/2010 4:40:21 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MsSavra Is it just me or do you find it just as impolite and of bad taste if the profile picture (preferably the very first impression you get) of a male sub is that of him displaying his naked ass? What is it that compels them to put in one or lots of pictures of them mooning their viewers (whom they hope to impress favourably)? Usually I don't feel much favour for somebody who first of all shows me his naked ass - why should the rules of politeness not be valid here? Coming to think of it, I don't feel more favourable about men who think the first best thing to present to me is their dick (irrespective of the state of erection and/or adornment with whatever chastity device). Afterall, I don't introduce myself either with a hearty "I'm looking for a partner, please take a look at my bottom or genitals." But then, maybe I'm just finicky and old-fashioned. What's your opinion? I totally agree with you. As a male I definitely don't like seeing them. I would never do that. To me it just seems like a no-brainer. It's just tacky.

samboct -> RE: Pictures of "mooning" subs (10/12/2010 6:07:15 AM)
No, no no.... All of you have missed the point of the butt shot entirely. It's a very old ritual. It's not to attract nice women, it's to repel the evil wiccan hordes that lurk here. See, the devil has no buttocks, just a tail. Consequently, human buttocks frighten the devil, since he doesn't have any. So showing your buttocks is a way to ward off evil spirits driven by the devil. If the viewer has been possessed by the devil, she has to flee, and will leave the poor human alone. Nice human women, knowing that the devil has not taken over the man showing his naked buttocks, can feel safe with him. Now do you understand the reason for the butt shot? I remember reading Desmond Morris's Bodywatching, where he described that peasants during a thunderstorm, would kneel down and show their buttocks to the devil- the thunder they heard. From our perspective, it must have been a rather comical sight. Sam

LadyRian -> RE: Pictures of "mooning" subs (10/12/2010 7:52:04 AM)
It still is. Hence this thread!

Iholdthestrings -> RE: Pictures of "mooning" subs (10/12/2010 9:32:47 AM)
Did he just say "evil wiccan whores"? Sounds fun.

LadyRian -> RE: Pictures of "mooning" subs (10/12/2010 5:19:14 PM)
EEEEEEEEEbil Wiccan whores! Lots of fun. Guaranteed! ;)

DMFParadox -> RE: Pictures of "mooning" subs (10/14/2010 9:53:29 AM)
Rockin' evil wiccan whores. I know a few of those. Great for parties, not so much as girlfriends, as some unwise buddies of mine could attest. Poor bastards. Also, old page one news response - LadyRian's take on 'let's just be friends' is a very widely held commonsense approach that is actually a completely senseless wallbanger, once you've experienced the wrong end of its real world utility in life outside highschool as a male of the species. All the more so because of its infuriatingly plausible deniability. Greater wisdom on the subject is called for, for the sake of all women everywhere. It tends to breed misogyny. On the other hand, I think what RedMagic had to say on the subject that inspired her friendly yet misplaced rant about friendship was spot on. I practically cheered.

tiggerspoohbear -> RE: Pictures of "mooning" subs (10/14/2010 10:45:28 AM)
I hate to see full-moon shots, I live in the country so I can look out when there really is a full moon and it's up in the sky where it belongs. Full frontal shots aren't any better, that's why I have BOBs, if I can't hold it, then I don't wanna see it. The same goes for the women with the explicit beaver shots or anything that makes me go eewwww. If I have a reason for asking to see it, then it's going to be my reason alone. Seeing "have web cam" also does nothing for me, cuz I'm pretty sure what they're going to be doing once it's on. So I've learned the hard way to tell them that until they learn to spin on the damn thing, juggle two monkeys and a elephant while rubbing their tummy, I don't want anything to do with it. They're given 2 weeks to report back and I have yet to be "reported back" to. [;)]

Tantriqu -> RE: Pictures of "mooning" subs (10/14/2010 12:53:27 PM)
Because I'm more interested in a man's ass than his cock, I love a tasteful half-moon shot: but a gaping exit wound shot is an easy 'delete'. Guys, a Louisville slugger? Really!? However, a moonshot can also be a sign the guy is bi-, which is also a 'delete' as quick as a cockshot. A B&W torso shot or a smile are still my favourites.

LadyPact -> RE: Pictures of "mooning" subs (10/16/2010 7:14:22 AM)
Something I never knew. Clicking that little x to the left on the who's viewing list allows you to nix the full moon shots that you don't want to see off of your 'who's viewing' list. I'm very happy with this bit of information. (Yes, I was too dumb to know this prior.)

Page: << < prev 1 2 3 [4]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125