Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: The Failure of Conservatism


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: The Failure of Conservatism Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The Failure of Conservatism - 10/6/2010 8:45:38 PM   
pyroaquatic


Posts: 1535
Joined: 12/4/2006
From: Pyroaquatica
Status: offline
The Failure to do what is best for America and its people.

I would replace politicians with people who have actually experienced the street and have to deal with REAL issues. We decided that other people should make the decision for us.

It is anarchy posing as democracy. Think!


_____________________________

You are what your deep, driving desire is.
As your desire is, so is your will.
As your will is, so is your deed.
As your deed is, so is your destiny.
-Brihadaranyaka Upanishad IV.4.5

(in reply to AnimusRex)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: The Failure of Conservatism - 10/6/2010 8:51:11 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline
Yes, stagflation was a truly a paradise for the middle and working class. How I miss those wonderful childhood days, when a candy bar went from 15 cents to a quarter, but my allowance didn't change.

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to AnimusRex)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: The Failure of Conservatism - 10/6/2010 8:52:21 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: AnimusRex


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
You demonstrated in the other thread that you dont know what conservatism is. You reinforce that with asinine statments like this:

"not one piece of liberal lawmaking has been introduced or passed in the past 30 years."


So what was this liberal legislation that was passed? I must have missed it. Can you point it out for me?


TARP
Stimulus
Obama care
Multiple Extensions of unemployment benefits
No Child Left Behind
Sarbanes Oxley
Medicare prescription drugs
Family and Medical leave act
Americorp act
CDFI Fund Act
Increases in the minimum wage
Mental health parity Act
Childrens Health Insurance Act
Air Quality Act
Head Start Expansion and Reauthorizaton
Americans with Disabilities Act
Clean Air Act Amendments
Repeal of Glass Steagall I was on a Clinton roll

That enough or do I need to actually think hard?

< Message edited by willbeurdaddy -- 10/6/2010 9:04:00 PM >


_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to AnimusRex)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: The Failure of Conservatism - 10/6/2010 9:01:19 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline
But Wilbur, none of those actually went far enough...


You do seem to have left out who got the mess rolling with "everybody should be a homeowner."

< Message edited by TheHeretic -- 10/6/2010 9:02:49 PM >


_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: The Failure of Conservatism - 10/6/2010 9:07:07 PM   
AnimusRex


Posts: 2165
Joined: 5/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


TARP
Stimulus
Obama care
Multiple Extensions of unemployment benefits
No Child Left Behind
Sarbanes Oxley
Medicare prescription drugs
Family and Medical leave act
Americorp act
CDFI Fund Act
Increases in the minimum wage
Mental health parity Act
Childrens Health Insurance Act
Air Quality Act
Head Start Expansion and Reauthorizaton
Americans with Disabilities Act
Clean Air Act Amendments
Repeal of Glass Steagall

That enough or do I need to actually think hard?


OK, first off, TARP and the stimulus were bandaid patches, not liberal lawmaking on par with Social Security and Medicare.

Health Care Reform was the single piece of liberal change that has been enacted since Medicare; and even that was a watered down shadow of real health care reform.

Repeal of Glass Steagal was a liberal act?????
Jesus God, FDR was spinning in his grave when that happened! The repeal of Glass Steagal was the product of banksters, republicans, and corporate Democrats to give Wall Street what they always wanted, the key to the liquor cabinetand keys to the car (with apologies to PJ O'Rourke).

The Medicare Part D (thanks, Dubya!) was a bit of corporate welfare for the pharmaceutical industry, not any serious attempt to better the lives of seniors.

I might give you the ADA; so I concede that one.

The rest of your list? Proves my point, in that these were tiny, compromised, and watered down pieces of half hearted social action.

What I meant by liberal lawmaking was large changes to the relationship of government to the people, like Social Security or groundbreaking changes in how society treats each other like the Civil Rights Act, or massive investments in the physical infrastructure like the TVA, or the Interstate Highway System.

What we have seen are small minded pork barrel projects, or bipartisan corporate welfare gifts. Remember that most of the Clinton era Democrats were corporate whores almost as much as the Republicans.

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: The Failure of Conservatism - 10/6/2010 9:07:20 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

But Wilbur, none of those actually went far enough...


You do seem to have left out who got the mess rolling with "everybody should be a homeowner."


Well, he said in the last 30 years, and the Community Redevlopment Act was 1977

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: The Failure of Conservatism - 10/6/2010 9:13:54 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: AnimusRex

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


TARP
Stimulus
Obama care
Multiple Extensions of unemployment benefits
No Child Left Behind
Sarbanes Oxley
Medicare prescription drugs
Family and Medical leave act
Americorp act
CDFI Fund Act
Increases in the minimum wage
Mental health parity Act
Childrens Health Insurance Act
Air Quality Act
Head Start Expansion and Reauthorizaton
Americans with Disabilities Act
Clean Air Act Amendments
Repeal of Glass Steagall

That enough or do I need to actually think hard?


OK, first off, TARP and the stimulus were bandaid patches, not liberal lawmaking on par with Social Security and Medicare. sorry, but you dont get to move the goal posts.

Health Care Reform was the single piece of liberal change that has been enacted since Medicare; and even that was a watered down shadow of real health care reform. see above comment about "not going far enough"

Repeal of Glass Steagal was a liberal act?????
Jesus God, FDR was spinning in his grave when that happened! The repeal of Glass Steagal was the product of banksters, republicans, and corporate Democrats to give Wall Street what they always wanted, the key to the liquor cabinetand keys to the car (with apologies to PJ O'Rourke). already corrrect

The Medicare Part D (thanks, Dubya!) was a bit of corporate welfare for the pharmaceutical industry, not any serious attempt to better the lives of seniors.bullshit

I might give you the ADA; so I concede that one.

The rest of your list? Proves my point, in that these were tiny, compromised, and watered down pieces of half hearted social action. moving the goal posgts again

What I meant by liberal lawmaking was large changes to the relationship of government to the people, like Social Security or groundbreaking changes in how society treats each other like the Civil Rights Act, or massive investments in the physical infrastructure like the TVA, or the Interstate Highway System.you were very clear in what you said. When youre proven wrong you gtry to back off on it. Doesnt fly.

What we have seen are small minded pork barrel projects, or bipartisan corporate welfare gifts. Remember that most of the Clinton era Democrats were corporate whores almost as much as the Republicans.



Former conservative my ass

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to AnimusRex)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: The Failure of Conservatism - 10/7/2010 4:22:24 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

So my question is, where is it? Is the America middle class stronger, more secure than we were in say, 1980? Who here has a more secure job, who has a more secure retirement, than they did in 1980?


Well I can't speak for anyone else, but I am in much better shape than I was back in 1980.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to AnimusRex)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: The Failure of Conservatism - 10/7/2010 6:52:58 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

But Wilbur, none of those actually went far enough...


You do seem to have left out who got the mess rolling with "everybody should be a homeowner."


Well, he said in the last 30 years, and the Community Redevlopment Act was 1977


2010 policy is NO ONE should be a homeowner.

STOMP

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: The Failure of Conservatism - 10/7/2010 8:50:57 AM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

But Wilbur, none of those actually went far enough...


You do seem to have left out who got the mess rolling with "everybody should be a homeowner."


Well, he said in the last 30 years, and the Community Redevlopment Act was 1977


2010 policy is NO ONE should be a homeowner.

STOMP


Is it? I think the policy statement that said that must have passed me by. Do you have a link for that besides Alex's ravings?

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: The Failure of Conservatism - 10/7/2010 12:42:58 PM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
Funny I though over that time frame the Democrats were in the majority a good part of the time... why blame only conservatism?

Butch

_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to AnimusRex)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: The Failure of Conservatism - 10/7/2010 1:10:45 PM   
luckydawg


Posts: 2448
Joined: 9/2/2009
Status: offline
Because as we have seen all along, and especially clearly since Obama took over is that democratics can't manage a picnic, much less run a country.

They are silly bitches who must do as they are told by the Republicans.



_____________________________

I was posting as Right Wing Hippie, but that account got messed up.

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: The Failure of Conservatism - 10/7/2010 1:21:06 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydawg

Because as we have seen all along, and especially clearly since Obama took over is that democratics can't manage a picnic, much less run a country.

They are silly bitches who must do as they are told by the Republicans.




Now now, dont be so harsh. The beer summit seemed to go very well. They didnt even serve Schlitz.

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to luckydawg)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: The Failure of Conservatism - 10/7/2010 1:23:46 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
LOL, we are only missing the one Baghdad Bob impersonator.

7.3.6.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: The Failure of Conservatism - 10/7/2010 1:35:12 PM   
luckydawg


Posts: 2448
Joined: 9/2/2009
Status: offline
Nope, I see him right there in post 34.

_____________________________

I was posting as Right Wing Hippie, but that account got messed up.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: The Failure of Conservatism - 10/7/2010 1:37:14 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
even more failure for you then.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to luckydawg)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: The Failure of Conservatism - 10/7/2010 1:46:57 PM   
luckydawg


Posts: 2448
Joined: 9/2/2009
Status: offline
see thats all democratics can do. Mutter nonsense from the corner while they whine about what the Men are doing.


Reality for all to see.... a filibuster proof majority (both houses and the Presidency), and from the POTUS down to the chat room, nothing but whining and excuse making.

The health Care reform was a riot. All of you kept saying how you demanded a Public option or else. Obama did. Then he caved (to members of his own party) and you all did the 1984 turn like a bunch of sparrows, while declaring a great victory.

You can't write comedy like that.


"even more failure for you then. Hah, take that!!"


< Message edited by luckydawg -- 10/7/2010 1:49:42 PM >


_____________________________

I was posting as Right Wing Hippie, but that account got messed up.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: The Failure of Conservatism - 10/7/2010 1:51:54 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
There is no filibuster proof majority.  You will not have one in the house.  Your saying it does not make it so.  That asswipe you peddle is the equivalent to ALL republicans are sucking dicks in the Minneapolis Airport, and I won't let you paint all those republicans with that brush.


< Message edited by mnottertail -- 10/7/2010 1:58:24 PM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to luckydawg)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: The Failure of Conservatism - 10/7/2010 2:01:44 PM   
luckydawg


Posts: 2448
Joined: 9/2/2009
Status: offline
and some folks might not be smart enough to notice you changing "was" to "is".


Those would be loyal democratic voters.



"You will not have one (a filibusterproof majority) in the house."

this is classic Mnottertail nonsense.

He knows he can't actually defend his ideological side, so he resorts to crap like this.

He makes words, but they don't mean anything.

And some folks are so dumb they buy it.

Of course "we" will not have a filibuster proof majority in the House. there is no filibuster in the House. I never said we would.


Its a bunch of spew he makes because its all he can do.

_____________________________

I was posting as Right Wing Hippie, but that account got messed up.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: The Failure of Conservatism - 10/7/2010 2:04:26 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
do you eat retard pills?  There was no filibuster proof majority, there is no filibuster proof majority, and there will be no filibuster proof majority  when you get your 220-230 republicans in the house.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to luckydawg)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: The Failure of Conservatism Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109