Pavel
Posts: 308
Joined: 1/10/2005 From: Washington Status: offline
|
I had this coversation with a friend of mine, but I think our proposed "baby fueled power plants" wouldn't go over well with all you bleeding heart liberals (think of it as a "Modest Proposal" ala energy crunch). An equally unacceptable, but amuseing for me at least, would be requireing everyone in the United States to pass an age appropriate physical fitness test. If you fail said test, you'd be put on a treadmill for X number of hours a day, which in turn would be used to generate power. Of course, that being a gross violation of "human rights" (whatever those really are), I'm at a bit of an impasse. Nuclear power is good, but has that really awesome stigma that makes some portions of the population explode with protesty fury, as really, if it's nuclear, then that means it can, and eventually will explode, ending the world as we know it (seriously, I had someone take such a stance when talking about Radioisotope Thermoeletric Generators, and that was just fun stuff). Geothermal power while really nifty when it works, has the following major problems; maintence, and uh, you need a geothermal vent handy to plug it in to. For plenty of places, that's really not much of an option. Wind is grand, if you've got the space for it, and don't have endangered birds, bats, or whatever to fly into them and get killed (which in turn rather irks off the same people who usually support wind power). Bioresource, eh, I don't know enough about it to comment properly, but I'd imagined an efficent, localized solution wouldn't just be ignored because of big bad oil. Of course, that all said, the level of influence that big business, oil or no has on the US government is just spooky as is. If you sit back a little bit and think though, I think you'll realize that it's not just a president Bush thing, but it's more your elected representives from both parties. Anyways, why the hell am I here and not working on my hist 450 paper?
|