ElanSubdued -> RE: What do it takes to become a pro domme? (10/26/2010 6:26:22 PM)
|
WyldHrt, quote:
WyldHrt to DMFParadox: This approach probably would have worked on me... when I was 20 or so. After years of meeting guys who use this 'surefire' technique, I spot the game playing straight off and just walk away. The man who currently holds my interest, and has for quite some time, broke every 'rule' that has been posted here. While we flirted in the beginning (and still do, every chance we get), he made it clear from the get go that he was interested in me, and said right off that I could always talk to him about anything. Devious man that he is, he has gotten into my head a way few in my life ever have by listening and caring. He has always been my friend and has seen me through a ton of crap. He is mannerly and has no problem courting a lady that interests him. He's my friend, I love him.... and just hearing his voice gets me hot, to boot. Hey, the later paragraph is very nice to read. Yay you! Well, actually, yay for both of you! quote:
WyldHrt to DMFParadox: Sorry, swing and a miss. I find it rather amusing that you think there is some universal pattern to relationships between people, and seem to assume that all women are cookie cutouts that biologically react the same way to 'the approach'. The fact that you assume all women can be had with some variation of 'the approach' just makes me ill, as some of us have no interest in playing games. It is also revealing that you refer to women as 'girls' when discussing such techniques. Read my last post to DMF. Despite the kneejerk components (for example, defining lying as an essential survival skill), DFM initially had me considering his techniques from a sociological, psychological, and paradoxical stance. Upon reading more, I'm not finding much profound meaning or contradictory truth. On the positive side, while these gambits are designed not to be spotted, they are still exceedingly transparent and are thus easy to identify and to avoid. Those with experience on the receiving end do just that. Effectively, this limits the effectiveness to a specific demographic, which is perhaps why DFM uses the term "girls" instead of "women". (Yeah, yeah. I saw the "fewer letters" reply. Possibly a gambit to prove authenticity? That's the problem with using techniques like this. Nobody can trust what you say.) I have faith that adults will behave like adults. If a woman introduces herself and then spends her time talking with other people, that's where I assume her interest is. My reaction will likely be to join the conversation on a perfunctory level or to focus my attention elsewhere. It's possible a woman may feel too shy to talk with me. If I'm in a group of mutual friends, we all look out for one another so in short order I'll know of her interest and, if I'm interested too, I'll solve the problem by going over to talk with her. The fact she is feeling shy is likely to *attract* my attention because that's very human and endearing. I've been in plenty of situations where I'm the person feeling shy, but I navigate around this. It's always good to remind oneself "you miss one hundred percent of the opportunities you don't take". Conversely, this doesn't mean one should take very opportunity presented. :-) Elan.
|
|
|
|