MrRodgers
Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote:
ORIGINAL: defiantbadgirl Lately it seems that all politicians want to do is point fingers and play the blame game. Who cares whose fault it was? Some of us are more concerned with how to improve the situation. STIMULUS With the stipulation that all new jobs created with stimulus money must be created in the US and remain in the US permanently. BAIL OUTS Companies can only get bailed out in exchange for bringing jobs back to the US and keeping them in the US. UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE If health care was non profit and tied to all taxable income instead of employers being forced to share the cost, companies that outsource work to other countries to avoid paying health insurance premiums would no longer have reason to do so. Do you think any of these ideas would help the US economy? Why or why not? What are some of your ideas? No need to put stipulations on permanent jobs created by stimulus money...there is no such thing. No company should be bailed out. If health care had always been non-profit life expectancy would still be in the 60s (great for Social Security!). Are you prepared to forego those kinds of advances and lower the quality of those willing to enter the profession in exchange for the dubious benefits of being "non-profit"? At least youre headed in the right direction...health care should not be an employer issue at all. Remove the tax incentives for employer provided health care and replace them with effective individual spending accounts, free up competition amongst insurers, get some tort reform that is reasonable but doesnt create moral hazard on the doc's side and you have everything you need to bend the cost curve down...not up, the way Blow-care pushes it. I agree with most of this but for life expectancy under a single payer (govt.) system, the Europeans under theirs, pay about 1/3 of what we do and live 3-4 years longer. (their insurance cos already heavily compete) Also, as many advances in medical technology and pharmacy, come from Europe as does from the US. Furthermore, as far as I know, ALL single payer systems have a limit to medical civil suits I think one is $200,000 (death) plus a portion from a formula assessed upon an 'appraised' life time earnings and only upon finding of neglect. But fees and income are in many cases...also regulated. Even drug prices and more are regulated. The 'free market' and the constant incentive for the highest returns creates prices where in the US a head/shoulders MRI is $1,500...in Japan for example, $100. IN Japan and others also...there is no waiting for many basic services even many surgeries. We have subsidized Cadillac prices for drugs and MD's and making millions. I believe in a truly free market but why do we keep harping on it when we know for 30-40 years...the plutocracy and those who profit...want no part of it ? Govt., single-payer takes health-care off business and patient ledgers. Then we go after any so-called efficiencies.
|