RapierFugue
Posts: 4740
Joined: 3/16/2006 From: London, England Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DesFIP quote:
ORIGINAL: RapierFugue quote:
ORIGINAL: DesFIP However some one could talk to you, decide you aren't good enough and list you as a person to be wary of. Would you like that? No way to redeem yourself or prove yourself innocent? Because there isn't any way to vet people Strictly speaking, there is. It's called monitoring of all on-site comms. And I wouldn't like that, as I suspect many others wouldn't. Not to mention that, for a site of this size, the costs would run into ... well lots. Lots and lots. Heaps, in fact. Does the OP fancy paying that much? I doubt it. A star chamber is not what's required. My take on this would be to follow Chopper's advice, and harden the fuck up [1] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XY3TfjOeuhM [1] although I'm not advocating that in a dodgy way So if you met and had a real life relationship that ended bitterly, the site could decide who was at fault and therefore who was twue and who wasn't? I don't think so. If it was that easy, family court judges would have an easier time of it. Maybe the girl whose picture the op posts could claim he's a fake, by displaying her photo without her permission. At the very least, he's rude as can be by so doing. Can we report him for that? As I said (and you seem to be agreeing with me, albeit via the back door), it's all unenforceable without massive and costly monitoring, which I wouldn't like, nor would most folks, therefore it's best we don't bother trying. The way things are works just fine, unless someone is sensitive to the point of idiocy.
|