Andalusite
Posts: 2492
Joined: 1/25/2009 Status: offline
|
I dislike the "limits" terminology. If I am in a D/s or M/s relationship as a submissive or slave, I need to trust that my partner isn't going to deliberately do serious harm to me physically or emotionally, and that they have common sense. I don't have a "limit" on sex/BDSM play with children or having body parts lopped off - I wouldn't date someone who wanted me to do those things, even if they were willing to refrain/abide by my "limits." Likewise, someone who wanted an open relationship would just be incompatible with me period, rather than my agreeing to date him as long as he agreed to be monogamous. I don't want to feel like I constantly have to say no and defend myself. If I am scared or uncomfortable about an activity, I want to brainstorm with him on how to get to what he wants from me, or if it's a matter of needing more time/trust emotional commitment, getting there before he expects it of me. In general, almost any activity or toy can be used in a way that would be unbearable, or that I could enjoy, it depends on how warmed up I am, the mindset I'm in, how he goes about it, how hard he does it, etc. On the flip side, dating a submissive with a laundry list of "thou shalt nots" feels a bit restrictive to me. I want a partner who is game to try most things - if there are a couple of touchy spots, fine, if they aren't very masochistic but react the way I like to light pain, it's all good. I don't want a heavy dose of scripting though, and I'd have a hard time thinking of someone as submissive if they weren't willing to make some effort to please me and adapt to me. I certainly wouldn't steamroller over their boundaries, but I would question our compatibility.
|