CalifChick -> RE: What's wrong with being a switch? (10/24/2010 10:16:52 AM)
|
I don't believe in switches in the way that most people define the word. Most people, in my experience, who talk about being a switch, talk about switching orientations, from dom to sub or sub to dom. I don't think it's possible. If you believe that dominance is an orientation and not a role, then it isn't possible to have two opposite orientations at the same time. And for those who think bisexual people do that, they don't; their orientations are not opposite, the way that leading and following are opposite. What is possible, however, is switching activites, which is topping and bottoming. That doesn't make you a switch. If there's no power involved, it makes you a kinkster that likes to top and bottom. If there's power involved, it makes you a dom or sub that likes to bottom or top. So for the question, "what's wrong with being a switch?", the answer for me is usually, "because you are a kinkster and not a dominant, and I need a dominant." Cali
|
|
|
|