CallaFirestormBW
Posts: 3651
Joined: 6/29/2008 Status: offline
|
Agreed -- this is a big issue that often shows up on the boards... I guess my issue with the comment is that these issues aren't limited to poly -- in fact, by sheer proportion they come out a lot more often in monogamous relationships, just because the largest majority of relationships that exist happen to be monogamous. Poly does not increase the chances that someone will immerse themselves in self-deception... it is just one more category to add to the areas that a person -might- put themselves at risk if they're not completely honest. It's no different than the person who, deep inside, knows that xhe can never yield in a full-authority dynamic, and yet enters into a relationship with someone who insists on that kind of dynamic, because the one entering the relationship is SURE that "their -love- will mean that this person will change and no longer want a full-authority dynamic. Replace that example with everything from vegetarian/meat-eater to religious/atheist to talkative/silent, and then add in the whole -range- in which these imbalances can exist and it rapidly becomes apparent that relationships are risky regardless of the number of people involved... and that the most functional relationships come from knowing and accepting -yourself- first (along with the acknowledgment that one is going to -change- over time), and -then- accepting the realities of the other person, either spoken or unspoken, and recognizing what one is truly able to compromise, to -try- compromising on (with the understanding that one may find that one is not able to do so), and which things one is either unable, unwilling or both to compromise on... ONLY from there, whether poly or monogamous, can one really decide whether a given relationship is going to work. Believe me --- I've MADE the mistakes. I was married for 13 years in a monogamous marriage because I really -liked- the person I was with... and he knew that I was poly from the outset, and that it was an -experiment- for me to enter into the relationship, because I really wasn't sure I could change enough to be the "normal" wife I thought he wanted -- HE, on the other hand, thought he could adapt to having someone who was as wild and chaotic as I was around -all- the time, and that he'd be able to adapt to my 'strangeness'... We spent 10 years in the military, where I didn't spend a lot of time with him because he was always deployed... and it only took 3 YEARS of him and I being together -all- the time to realize that NEITHER of us, as much as we cared about each other, could change our natures enough to be happy most of the time in the relationship we were in... we spent 80% of our time miserable for that 20% of the time when we were ecstatic... and that just was too imbalanced for both of us, so we ended up parting ways -- very amicably, but it was -still- very difficult... especially because we'd spent more than a decade building a life with one another. After that, I learned that, for me, I have defined boundaries that affect how much I can change to suit a relationship -- and I'm honest if it looks like what the relationship is going to -require- is going to slip far enough outside those areas of flexibility that I won't be able to hold up my end of the bargain. Each person has to take on these responsibilities--and we can't always depend on the other person or people involved to know themselves and be capable of the amount of awareness it takes to be that honest with -us-... so there is always a risk, in every relationship -- so a monogamous partner -isn't- necessarily a "safer" option. Does that make sense? Calla Calla
< Message edited by CallaFirestormBW -- 10/26/2010 8:56:46 AM >
_____________________________
*** Said to me recently: "Look, I know you're the "voice of reason"... but dammit, I LIKE being unreasonable!!!!" "Your mind is more interested in the challenge of becoming than the challenge of doing." Jon Benson, Bodybuilder/Trainer
|